Tanchjim Oxygen [6.3/10]
Reviews (7), scores and comparisons for Tanchjim Oxygen
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tanchjim Oxygen
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.3Mixed to Positive
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.3Gaming Grade
BTanchjim Oxygen Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: TANCHJIM Top TANCHJIM IEMs
Price (Msrp): $270
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
8*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Gizaudio Axel
6.5
Reviewer Score
A
Tuning
B+
Tech
Reviewed by: Crin
6.5
Reviewer Score
A
Tuning
B+
Tech
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.4
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B+
Tech
Solid tuning, a more mature sounding Hana
Forward upper midrange may not be for everyone
Bass: B
Mids: B+
Treble: B
Soundstage: B+
Details: A-
Imaging: B+
Reviewed by: Precogvision
6.1
Reviewer Score
B
Tuning
B
Tech
A better KXXS with slightly out-of-head imaging.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: A-
Treble: B
Dynamics: B
Details: B
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
5.5
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
A-
Tech
Reviewed by: Nymz
4.9
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C+
Tech
Great IEM for accoustics etc, but terrible fit. Tripowin Olina is the better option for almost a third of the price.
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tanchjim Oxygen Infos
Compare Tanchjim Oxygen to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better bass, treble and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better bass, imaging and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better imaging, bass and details.
|
7.6 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better bass, treble and details.
|
7.4 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, soundstage and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better treble, bass and details.
|
7.3 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better soundstage.
|
7.3 |
|
Tanchjim Oxygen vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better bass and mids.
|
7.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
B-
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review