Tingker Acoustics H16 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.5/10)

Home Tingker Acoustics H16

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Tingker Acoustics H16 is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Odd for me.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+

Tingker Acoustics H16 Infos

Discuss Tingker Acoustics H16 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Tingker Acoustics H16 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Tingker Acoustics H16 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Tingker Acoustics H16 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Ziigaat Horizon
Ziigaat Horizon offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.9
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Nice HCK Himalaya
Nice HCK Himalaya offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.8
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.7
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua
Moondrop Blessing 3 Aqua offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.7
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.7
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.7
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.7
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.6
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C-
Expect adequate midrange presence with a touch of grit and unevenness. Textures smear when the mix gets busy.
Treble C-
Treble performance is average, audible but short on refinement. There's acceptable presence but limited finesse.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer