Tingker Acoustics H16 - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (C Tier | 4.5/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Tingker Acoustics H16
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.5Generally Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.2Gaming Grade
C-Tingker Acoustics H16 Details
Driver Configuration: 8BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $280
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
2025-09-30
4.5
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
C-
Tech
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tingker Acoustics H16 Infos
Compare Tingker Acoustics H16 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.6 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.6 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Tingker Acoustics H16 vs. MYER SL224
MYER SL224 offers better soundstage, mids and treble.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review