TinHifi P2 - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (D Tier | 3/10)
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3Very Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.9Gaming Grade
D+TinHifi P2 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Tin HiFi Top Tin HiFi IEMs
Price (Msrp): $370
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3
Reviewer Score
D-
Tuning
C
Tech
One of the airiest IEMs I've heard, to the point of which it's painful.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: D
Treble: E-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
TinHifi P2 Infos
Compare TinHifi P2 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Yu9 Que
Yu9 Que offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
8.2 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. ZiiGaat Luna
ZiiGaat Luna offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.9 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.8 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.6 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
HiSenior Cano Cristales offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
|
7.5 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Ziigaat Arcanis offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.5 |
|
TinHifi P2 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better treble, mids and bass.
|
7.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D-- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
E-
Treble is extremely rolled off and veiled. High frequencies are barely perceptible with significant loss of detail.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review