Tri Draco IEM Review, Price & Ranking

Expert and community scores, sound signature and specs for Tri Draco

IEMRanking.com Home Tri Draco

Tri Draco Average Reviewer Scores

Gizaudio Axel Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

5.4

Mixed to Negative

Tri Draco Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.2

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Tri Draco reviewed by:

Gizaudio Axel 5.5 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

Tri Draco reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 5.2 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Soundstage: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Tri Draco Infos

Sound Metrics

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Soundstage C+
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Top alternatives for Tri Draco

IEM Comparison Tool

new
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer