IEMRanking.com
Home
Tripowin Rhombus
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
1.9Abysmal
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
1.5Gaming Grade
ETripowin Rhombus Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+1BA
Tuning Type: V-shape
Brand: Tripowin Top Tripowin IEMs
Price (Msrp): $80
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
Reviewed by: Nymz
Overall tuning balance is weak with too much treble action and lack of bass presence. Timbre is off. Stages on your head, despite sounding airy.
Bass: E+
Mids: E+
Treble: E+
Details: E-
Imaging: E+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tripowin Rhombus Infos
Compare Tripowin Rhombus to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble and mids.
|
6.5 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
6.5 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Tanchjim 4U
Similar overall performance.
|
6.4 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
|
6.3 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better details, bass and mids.
|
6.3 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Moondrop Aria 2
Moondrop Aria 2 offers better details, bass and mids.
|
6.2 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Pula Unicrom
Pula Unicrom offers better mids and treble.
|
6.1 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Truthear Pure
Truthear Pure offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
6.1 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. Truthear Hexa
Truthear Hexa offers better mids, details and treble.
|
6.1 |
Tripowin Rhombus vs. EPZ X Tipsy Star One
EPZ X Tipsy Star One offers better mids and treble.
|
6 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
E+- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
E-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass
E+
Noticeably thin bass presence. Lacks body and texture, leaving low frequencies feeling hollow and underdeveloped.
Mids
E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble
E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Details
E-
Extremely poor resolution. Fine details are completely lost, leaving only a vague impression of the music's structure.
Imaging
E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming
E
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review