Tripowin TC01 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (D Tier | 3/10)

IEMRanking.com Home Tripowin TC01

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

3

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3

Gaming Grade

D

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 3 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D Tech
Another V-shaped tuning with average technicalities. Not bad, not good.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: D Imaging: D

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Tripowin TC01 Infos

Compare Tripowin TC01 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Tripowin TC01 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
Tripowin TC01 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
6.4
Tripowin TC01 vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6
Tripowin TC01 vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6
Tripowin TC01 vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
5.8
Tripowin TC01 vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
5.7
Tripowin TC01 vs. CCA Rhapsody
CCA Rhapsody offers better mids and treble.
5.7
Tripowin TC01 vs. HBB KZ PR2
Similar overall performance.
5.5
Tripowin TC01 vs. EPZ Q5
EPZ Q5 offers better mids and treble.
5.5
Tripowin TC01 vs. Simgot EW200
Simgot EW200 offers better bass, details and imaging.
5.5
Best IEMs from below $50

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer