IEMRanking.com
Home
Tripowin x HBB Olina
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.4Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.1Gaming Grade
C+Tripowin x HBB Olina Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: Tripowin Top Tripowin IEMs
Price (Msrp): $100
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Pretty good for the price but a little bright/shouty stock. Slap a second stock filter on top, and it's much improved! Good vocals-focused set with decently sparkly treble and good bass punch. Technicalities are quite good for the price. Average stage but has decent imaging. Previously Owned
New HBB Xuan NV is just the way to go over this. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C-
Soundstage: A-
Exellent tonality and shimmer (for a DD); nonetheless, could possibly benefit from better layering chops. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: B
Treble: B
Dynamics: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
Close to Oxygen but for 99$ with better fit. One of the best price-to-performance you can get at the moment. Good imaging, great stage presentation and very balanced harman tuning. If you don't wish to mod, grab Olina SE instead.
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Tripowin x HBB Olina Infos
Compare Tripowin x HBB Olina to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better dynamics, treble and bass.
|
7.1 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics and mids.
|
6.6 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant
JUZEAR x Z Reviews Defiant offers better mids, bass and dynamics.
|
6.6 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics.
|
6.6 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better bass, details and imaging.
|
6.5 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Letshuoer S08
Letshuoer S08 offers better bass, details and dynamics.
|
6.5 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble and dynamics.
|
6.5 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better bass, details and imaging.
|
6.3 |
Tripowin x HBB Olina vs. Kefine Klanar
Kefine Klanar offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
6.3 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Soundstage
A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review