IEMRanking.com
Home
UM Stardust
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.8Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.4Gaming Grade
C-UM Stardust Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $800
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
Pillowy bass, bland. Just not great especially at this price.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Soundstage: A-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
UM Stardust Infos
Compare UM Stardust to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
UM Stardust vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
8.3 |
UM Stardust vs. Thieaudio Hype 10
Thieaudio Hype 10 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
8.1 |
UM Stardust vs. Letshuoer EJ07
Letshuoer EJ07 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
8 |
UM Stardust vs. Thieaudio Origin
Thieaudio Origin offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.8 |
UM Stardust vs. Aful Cantor
Aful Cantor offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
|
7.8 |
UM Stardust vs. 7th Acoustics Supernova
7th Acoustics Supernova offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.8 |
UM Stardust vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.7 |
UM Stardust vs. Softears Twilight
Softears Twilight offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.6 |
UM Stardust vs. Moondrop S8
Moondrop S8 offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
7.6 |
UM Stardust vs. FlipEars Legion
FlipEars Legion offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
7.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review