Unique Meldody 3DT - Reviews & Ratings
1 Review (C Tier | 4.3/10)
IEMRanking.com
Home
Unique Meldody 3DT
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.3Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.5Gaming Grade
CUnique Meldody 3DT Details
Driver Configuration: 3DD
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $320
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.3
Reviewer Score
C-
Tuning
C+
Tech
Singers sound like they're stuck in head voice. Filter mod fixes tonality at the expense of note definition and dynamics.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: D
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C+
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Unique Meldody 3DT Infos
Compare Unique Meldody 3DT to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. ZiiGaat Luna
ZiiGaat Luna offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.9 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Dunu Vulkan 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
7.8 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.7 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better mids, imaging and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Epz K9
Epz K9 offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Xenns Tea Pro offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.5 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.5 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
|
7.5 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Punch Audio Martilo offers better mids, dynamics and bass.
|
7.5 |
|
Unique Meldody 3DT vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better mids, treble and bass.
|
7.4 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review