Vision Ears 3.2 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.1/10)

Home Vision Ears 3.2

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Vision Ears 3.2 is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

4.1

Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.1

Gaming Grade

C-

Vision Ears 3.2 Details

Driver Configuration: n/a

Tuning Type: n/a

Brand: Vision Ears Top Vision Ears IEMs

Price (Msrp): n/a

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.1 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
Warm and quite muffled sounding. Really needs a lot more treble extension. Won't offend at least.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-

Vision Ears 3.2 Infos

Discuss Vision Ears 3.2 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Vision Ears 3.2 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Bass C-
Bass stays subdued, content to hover in the background. It keeps things tidy, yet unremarkable.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C-
Expect modest dynamics that keep music listenable without thrill. Micro-contrast is serviceable.
Details C-
Nothing sounds offensive, yet nothing is etched sharply enough to captivate detail lovers. It's fine for casual listening sessions.
Imaging C-
Depth hints are present though they rarely extend far beyond the stage front. Movement effects are understandable.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer