Xenns Mangird Tea 2 [6.4/10]

Reviews (6), scores and comparisons for Xenns Mangird Tea 2

IEMRanking.com Home Xenns Mangird Tea 2

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Nymz Crin
Shuwa-T
Jays Audio
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Super* Review 8* * score normalized
Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Slightly more technical version of the OG TEAs. Thumpier low end, and treble is more extended. Less forward presentation. Stage has more depth. Can't scale as well as OG. Vocals are not as "magical" as OG.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio
Shuwa-T 6.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Comment: A bass boosted Tea with improved clarity. Easy-to-like tuning, with good technical performance to boot Treble rolls off prematurely

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: B+ Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: A- Details: A Imaging: A-
Precogvision 5.6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B- Tech
A little odd in some parts of the treble and detailing could use some work, but nothing offensive overall.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Details: B- Imaging: B
Nymz 5.6 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
C+ Tech
A technical upgrade over the OG version, with more balanced tunning. Sub-bass is good but has more mid-bass now than OG. Treble also got a boost and less refined, but has better extension.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: C+ Details: C+ Imaging: B
Crin 5.5 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B- Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Xenns Mangird Tea 2 Infos

Compare Xenns Mangird Tea 2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. ZiiGaat Luna
Offers better treble, dynamics and mids.
7.9
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.8
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Offers better details, treble and imaging.
7.7
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Softears Volume S
Offers better bass, treble and mids.
7.7
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
7.6
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
Offers better dynamics, treble and soundstage.
7.5
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.5
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
7.5
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
7.5
Xenns Mangird Tea 2 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Offers better dynamics, bass and treble.
7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer