XENNS Mangird Tea2 [6.3/10]

Reviews (1), scores and comparisons for XENNS Mangird Tea2

IEMRanking.com Home XENNS Mangird Tea2

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

6.3

Mixed to Positive

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.8

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Jaytiss 6.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Tea Pro is a bit better for my taste.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

XENNS Mangird Tea2 Infos

Compare XENNS Mangird Tea2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. ZiiGaat Luna
Offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.9
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Dunu Vulkan 2
Offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.8
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk
Offers better treble, mids and soundstage.
7.7
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Softears Volume S
Offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.7
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
7.6
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. HiSenior Cano Cristales
Offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
7.5
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Ziigaat Arcanis
Offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7.5
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Xenns Tea Pro
Offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
7.5
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Yanyin Canon II
Similar overall performance.
7.5
XENNS Mangird Tea2 vs. Punch Audio Martilo
Offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
7.5
Best IEMs from $200 - $400

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer