Yu9 U556 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.7/10)

IEMRanking.com Home Yu9 U556

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision

Average Reviewer Score:

4.7

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.3

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 4.7 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
A hair too forward in the pinna compensation, but generally well-tuned and a competent performer.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C- Details: C- Imaging: C-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Yu9 U556 Infos

Compare Yu9 U556 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Yu9 U556 vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better dynamics, bass and details.
7.1
Yu9 U556 vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
7
Yu9 U556 vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.9
Yu9 U556 vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better dynamics.
6.8
Yu9 U556 vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better details, bass and imaging.
6.7
Yu9 U556 vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better dynamics.
6.6
Yu9 U556 vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
6.6
Yu9 U556 vs. Shozy P20
Shozy P20 offers better dynamics.
6.6
Yu9 U556 vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better dynamics.
6.6
Yu9 U556 vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better bass, details and imaging.
6.5
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer