Ziigaat Cincotres [6.8/10]
Reviews (5), scores and comparisons for Ziigaat Cincotres
IEMRanking.com
Home
Ziigaat Cincotres
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.8Cautiously Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7Gaming Grade
A-Ziigaat Cincotres Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+3BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: ZiiGaat Top ZiiGaat IEMs
Price (Msrp): $269
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
A+
Tuning
A
Tech
Great bass texture, vocals, treble, solid all-rounder. Similar to Variations but with a smaller/delayed scoop, more mid-bass, but not as much treble/air. A fun bassy sound but still well-balanced. Correct polarity.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
6.9
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
B+
Tech
Very musical presentation with less aggressive vocals, treble is surprisingly good for such a relaxed tuning
Separation and less of a clear definition between the lower midrange and bass region
Bass: A-
Mids: A
Treble: A-
Soundstage: B+
Details: B+
Imaging: A-
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
6.8
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
C+
Tech
This is a mini Monarch MK , V baby.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Soundstage: A-
Reviewed by: Tim Tuned
6.5
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
A+
Tech
Reviewed by:
Fresh Reviews
6*
* The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Ziigaat Cincotres Infos
Compare Ziigaat Cincotres to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. Softears Volume S
Softears Volume S offers better soundstage, dynamics and treble.
|
7.7 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. Aful Performer 5+2
Aful Performer 5+2 offers better dynamics, mids and details.
|
7.7 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. Kiwi Ears Astral
Kiwi Ears Astral offers better dynamics, details and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. Ziigaat Odyssey
Ziigaat Odyssey offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.6 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. ZiiGaat Crescent
ZiiGaat Crescent offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci
Dunu x Gizaudio Davinci offers better dynamics, details and treble.
|
7.4 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. Binary Dynaquattro
Binary Dynaquattro offers better dynamics and soundstage.
|
7.4 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. CrinEar Meta
CrinEar Meta offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
7.3 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. Kiwi Ears Septet
Kiwi Ears Septet offers better dynamics and soundstage.
|
7.3 |
|
Ziigaat Cincotres vs. FATfreq x HBB Deuce
FATfreq x HBB Deuce offers better dynamics and mids.
|
7.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
A
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids
B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble
B+
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming
A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review