Symphonium Crimson VS 64 Audio Solo

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Symphonium Crimson and 64 Audio Solo are in-ear monitors. Symphonium Crimson costs $1,500 while 64 Audio Solo costs $1,400. Symphonium Crimson is $100 more expensive. Symphonium Crimson holds a decisive 1.8-point edge in reviewer scores (8.4 vs 6.6). Symphonium Crimson has significantly better bass with a 2.6-point edge, Symphonium Crimson has significantly better mids with a 1.7-point edge, Symphonium Crimson has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge, Symphonium Crimson has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge, Symphonium Crimson has significantly better soundstage with a 1.3-point edge, Symphonium Crimson has significantly better details with a 1.1-point edge and Symphonium Crimson has significantly better imaging with a 1.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric Symphonium Crimson 64 Audio Solo
Bass 8.6 6
Mids 7.7 6
Treble 7.5 5.5
Details 8.1 7
Soundstage 8.3 7
Imaging 8.5 7
Dynamics 7 6
Tonality 8 5.9
Technicalities 8.2 5.5

Symphonium Crimson Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Jaytiss
Nymz Shuwa-T Precogvision
Z-Reviews Jays Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

8.4

Very Positive


64 Audio Solo Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Jaytiss
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable


Symphonium Crimson User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Solo User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Symphonium Crimson Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.1

Gaming Grade

A-

64 Audio Solo Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.6

Gaming Grade

C

Symphonium Crimson Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • Very competent with articulate presentation. Well-defined layers and precise imaging. Soundstage is immersive and handles dynamics well.
Bass S-
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details A+
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision. Creates a palpable sense of physical placement with perfect positional stability.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Solo Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Symphonium Crimson Reviews

Z-Reviews 9.5 * score normalized
Jays Audio 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
U-shaped/Slight V/W Shaped. Energetic treble. Great tech. Fun signature.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio
Nymz 8.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Great bass, holographic stage and top of the shelf dynamics. Probably my favourite rendition of a W-shaped tuning to this date. Treble might be spicy for some, but using Divinus Velvets (stock black) seem to help a lot.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: S Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: S
Shuwa-T 8.4 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
The bassier Helios with no sacrifices to clarity

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: S- Mids: A+ Treble: S- Soundstage: S- Details: S- Imaging: S-
Precogvision 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Colored tonality done correctly with incredible bass and dynamics. Upper-treble can be slightly too zingy depending on source.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: S Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: A+
Smirk Audio 7.9 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Excellent bass, dynamics, and resolution. Very large soundstage with great imaging. Mid/upper-treble may be too elevated for some.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

- Smirk Audio
Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: S-
Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Suffers from BA bass, and super Zingie Treble.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A+

64 Audio Solo Reviews

Super* Review 7* * score normalized
This Planar lines up with the 64 Audio house sound. There are better options for Planars and this sound signature.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel
- Super* Review
Precogvision 6.9 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Warm and shimmery with excellent imaging. Dampening in the mid-treble elevates this above the standard planar IEM experience.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-
Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
It's nice, but is planar and kinda dull.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Symphonium Crimson User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio Solo User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer