64 Audio U18T and Canpur CP622B use 18BA (1 tia high,+1high-mid,+8low)+8mid, and 6BA+2EST+2BC driver setups respectively. 64 Audio U18T costs $2,999 while Canpur CP622B costs $3,500. Canpur CP622B is $501 more expensive. Canpur CP622B holds a decisive 1.6-point edge in reviewer scores (7.2 vs 8.8). Canpur CP622B has significantly better bass with a 2.7-point edge, Canpur CP622B has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge, Canpur CP622B has significantly better treble with a 1.2-point edge, Canpur CP622B has significantly better dynamics with a 1.6-point edge, 64 Audio U18T has slightly better soundstage with a 0.3-point edge, Canpur CP622B has better details with a 0.9-point edge and Canpur CP622B has significantly better imaging with a 1.3-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | 64 Audio U18T | Canpur CP622B |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 5.8 | 8.5 |
| Mids | 6.6 | 8.6 |
| Treble | 6.8 | 8 |
| Details | 8.2 | 9 |
| Soundstage | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Imaging | 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Dynamics | 6.4 | 8 |
| Tonality | 6.9 | 8.5 |
| Technicalities | 7.7 | 8.5 |
64 Audio U18T Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.2Generally Favorable
Canpur CP622B Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
8.8Excellent
Reviews Comparison
64 Audio U18T reviewed by Yifang
Buy 64 Audio U18T on audio46
Ad
Price: $2,999
Buy 64 Audio U18T on audio46
Canpur CP622B reviewed by Yifang
Yifang Youtube Channel
64 Audio U18T (more reviews)
64 Audio U18T reviewed by Super* Review
Youtube Video Summary
Positioned as a top-of-the-line “reference” set with 18 BAs and a ~$3,000 tag, the 64 Audio U18t brings a brighter tilt than its siblings. With the M15 APEX module, treble gains presence and vocals feel a touch more filled out than on U12t, but the upper range can push into fatigue—sibilant tracks (e.g., CHVRCHES “Graffiti”) come through a bit sharp. Bass emphasis skews mid-bass over sub-bass, adding body yet also a hint of bloat, so the overall balance reads more V/U-shaped than neutral-warm.
Technical ability is still strong—detail retrieval and extension impress without resorting to glare most of the time—but the tuning trade-offs blunt long-term comfort. Versus U12t, U18t is livelier up top yet less forgiving, and U12t’s cleaner, more dynamic low end feels better integrated. Build and fit are solid across the line; the stock cable, however, remains thin and tangle-prone.
End result: a premium, energetic take with sparkle and presence that will appeal to treble-tolerant listeners, but for many the combination of mid-bass thickness and occasional treble bite undercuts the value at this price—earning a moderate score compared with the smoother, more versatile U12t.
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel64 Audio U18T reviewed by Precogvision
Precogvision Youtube Channel
64 Audio U18T reviewed by Web Search
The 64 Audio U18t is a high-end, 18-BA universal IEM that combines the company’s tia tubeless treble driver and apex pressure-relief modules, targeted at reference-grade monitoring and critical listening. Official pricing sits at $2,999, positioning it among the most expensive universal monitors on the market. Specs indicate a four-way design with “1 tia high, 1 high-mid, 8 mid, 8 low” drivers, plus modular isolation via mX/m15/m20 inserts.
Tonal balance trends neutral-bright / mild V: elevated upper-mids and lower treble give strong clarity and bite, while bass is taut and fast but not the last word in physical slam compared to top dynamic-driver sets. This yields exceptional perceived detail and a forward, incisive presentation that some may find analytical on lean recordings. Multiple reviewers characterize it as brighter and more forward than peers, with mid-bass presence but limited macrodynamic weight.
Technical performance is a clear strength: resolution, imaging, and stage width are first-rate, with apex modules helping maintain openness and comfort over long sessions. Staging can approach “open-back” impressions, and the m20 vs m15 modules subtly shift bass/brightness without changing the fundamental FR character. Overall capability is top tier, but at this price the value proposition is contested; buyers prioritizing slam and macro-dynamics may prefer alternatives, while detail chasers will find the U18t a benchmark tool.
Canpur CP622B (more reviews)
Canpur CP622B reviewed by Shuwa-T
Canpur CP622B reviewed by Jaytiss
Youtube Video Summary
Canpur CP622B makes a striking first impression with a premium case, tidy accessories, and a shimmering faceplate—but the shell is huge, bordering on chunky, and can push fit comfort limits over longer sessions. Sonically, it hits with authoritative sub-bass and impressive extension, yet the overall presentation skews dark; vocals sit a touch recessed, with a wish for more 1.5–3 kHz presence and a bit more upper-air sparkle. Out of the box it already thumps, but a light EQ lift to upper mids and bass can coax out more vibration and energy.
On graphs and in A/Bs, the CP622B comes off as a specialist: fantastic low-end texture (bass judged around 9.5 for level), solid resolution and stage, but imaging feels slightly constrained by the muted 3 kHz region. Compared with peers, FATfreq Grand Maestro reads like the safer “one-and-done” all-rounder with more flair up top; Aful Cantor delivers comparable presence at a fraction of the cost; Hisenior Mega5-EST Bass offers a friendlier fit and a tuning that can feel just a hair more balanced; and as a personal north star, Elysian Annihilator 2023 still sets the bar for extension and excitement. Net: a fantastically built, bass-thrilling CP622B that shines with hip-hop/R&B and cinematic lows, but reads as niche and pricey—a connoisseur’s piece for big collections rather than a first-pick endgame.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Canpur CP622B reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio
Youtube Video Summary
Canpur CP622B is positioned as a true apex set among today’s ultra-high-end IEMs—think Storm, Grand Maestro, Pearl, Multiverse, RN6—where differences are subtle and taste-dependent, not about basic quality. The message is simple: once at the Money Trees level, most flagships are excellent; the CP622B stands out by pushing resolution and authenticity to the top of that pile while keeping music the focus.
Evaluation leans on a tight suite of reference cues: bass definition via Black Sabbath “Sweet Leaf” (2:36–3:10), midrange texture with Soundgarden “Spoonman” (spoons/vocals) and Neil Young “The Needle and the Damage Done,” and treble control from Aerosmith “No More No More” (recurring cymbal strikes). Micro-details and spatial tells include Michael Jackson’s beep, Violent Femmes finger snaps, the crowd-side triangulation in Lynyrd Skynyrd’s “Freebird,” Pink Floyd’s gate announcement in “On the Run,” Randy Rhoads’ finger slide in “Dee,” and the famous cough in “Wish You Were Here.” These checkpoints spotlight the CP622B’s clarity, attack/decay, and rare sense of depth for an in-ear.
Two practical notes seal it: level-matched A/B at 77 dB @ 440 Hz versus Subtonic Storm to ensure fair comparison, and a low-frequency test around ~42 Hz that makes the shells physically vibrate, delivering that body-felt slam prized in hip-hop and recognized in orchestral power. With a library spanning ACDC, Alice in Chains, Bob Marley, Dre, Kendrick, Metallica, Pink Floyd and more, CP622B reads as a top-tier all-rounder—immense detail at low volumes, potentially intense when cranked, and an easy recommendation for those chasing the very best.
Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube ChannelCanpur CP622B reviewed by Smirk Audio
64 Audio U18T Details
Driver Configuration: 18BA (1 tia high,+1high-mid,+8low)+8mid,
Tuning Type: Neutral, Bright
Brand: 64 Audio Top 64 Audio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $2,999
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Canpur CP622B Details
Driver Configuration: 6BA+2EST+2BC
Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost
Price (Msrp): $3,500
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
64 Audio U18T User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Canpur CP622B User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
64 Audio U18T Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.9Gaming Grade
B-Canpur CP622B Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7Gaming Grade
A-64 Audio U18T Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B+- Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.
Average Technical Grade
A- The balance of resolution and space feels assured, keeping complex passages coherent. Layering is convincing on most studio mixes.
Canpur CP622B Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
S-- Expect a tasteful, well-judged response that feels both musical and true to the source. Great synergy with a wide range of genres.
Average Technical Grade
S-- Clarity and detail leap forward, with precise imaging and an expansive stage. Orchestral works feel spacious and layered.
64 Audio U18T User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewCanpur CP622B User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS
