64 Audio U18T [5.9/10]
Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for 64 Audio U18T
IEMRanking.com
Home
64 Audio U18T
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.9Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.1Gaming Grade
C-64 Audio U18T Details
Driver Configuration: 18BA
Tuning Type: Bassy V
Brand: 64 Audio Top 64 Audio IEMs
Price (Msrp): $3,000
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
7*
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Precogvision
4.8
Reviewer Score
C
Tuning
B
Tech
Bloated BA bass and overly compressed dynamic range. The least "64 Audio" sounding IEM that fails to bridge mainstream tuning and Hi-Fi.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C-
Mids: C+
Treble: C+
Dynamics: C+
Details: A-
Imaging: B
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
64 Audio U18T Infos
Compare 64 Audio U18T to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Elysian Annihilator 2023
Elysian Annihilator 2023 offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
|
9 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Softears Enigma
Softears Enigma offers better bass, dynamics and treble.
|
9 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better bass, mids and dynamics.
|
8.9 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Elysian Annihilator 2021
Elysian Annihilator 2021 offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
|
8.8 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Canpur CP622B
Canpur CP622B offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
8.7 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Campire Audio Clara Ti
Campire Audio Clara Ti offers better bass, dynamics and mids.
|
8.6 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. 64 Audio U12t
64 Audio U12t offers better bass, mids and imaging.
|
8.5 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Kinera Imperial Loki
Kinera Imperial Loki offers better bass, imaging and mids.
|
8.5 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Forte Ears Macbeth
Forte Ears Macbeth offers better bass, treble and mids.
|
8.5 |
|
64 Audio U18T vs. Empire Ears Raven
Empire Ears Raven offers better bass, mids and imaging.
|
8.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
B- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
C+
Decent dynamic performance. Good macro-contrast but micro-dynamics could be more nuanced. Satisfactory impact.
Details
A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging
B
Good imaging with precise instrument placement. Clear localization within the soundstage including front/back positioning.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review