64 Audio U18T VS Fort Ears Mefisto

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

64 Audio U18T and Fort Ears Mefisto are in-ear monitors. 64 Audio U18T costs $2,999 while Fort Ears Mefisto costs $2,900. 64 Audio U18T is $99 more expensive. Fort Ears Mefisto holds a decisive 1.8-point edge in reviewer scores (7.2 vs 9). Fort Ears Mefisto has significantly better bass with a 2.2-point edge, Fort Ears Mefisto has significantly better mids with a 1.9-point edge, Fort Ears Mefisto has significantly better treble with a 1.7-point edge, Fort Ears Mefisto has significantly better dynamics with a 2.1-point edge, Fort Ears Mefisto has slightly better details with a 0.4-point edge and Fort Ears Mefisto has significantly better imaging with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric 64 Audio U18T Fort Ears Mefisto
Bass 5.8 8
Mids 6.6 8.5
Treble 6.8 8.5
Details 8.2 8.5
Soundstage 8.8 9
Imaging 7.5 8.5
Dynamics 6.4 8.5
Tonality 6.9 8.3
Technicalities 7.7 8.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough 64 Audio U18T and Fort Ears Mefisto reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

64 Audio U18T Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


Fort Ears Mefisto Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

9

Outstanding


Reviews Comparison

64 Audio U18T (more reviews)

64 Audio U18T reviewed by Yifang

Yifang 8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your 64 Audio U18T or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $2,999

Buy 64 Audio U18T on audio46

64 Audio U18T reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 7* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Positioned as a top-of-the-line “reference” set with 18 BAs and a ~$3,000 tag, the 64 Audio U18t brings a brighter tilt than its siblings. With the M15 APEX module, treble gains presence and vocals feel a touch more filled out than on U12t, but the upper range can push into fatigue—sibilant tracks (e.g., CHVRCHES “Graffiti”) come through a bit sharp. Bass emphasis skews mid-bass over sub-bass, adding body yet also a hint of bloat, so the overall balance reads more V/U-shaped than neutral-warm.

Technical ability is still strong—detail retrieval and extension impress without resorting to glare most of the time—but the tuning trade-offs blunt long-term comfort. Versus U12t, U18t is livelier up top yet less forgiving, and U12t’s cleaner, more dynamic low end feels better integrated. Build and fit are solid across the line; the stock cable, however, remains thin and tangle-prone.

End result: a premium, energetic take with sparkle and presence that will appeal to treble-tolerant listeners, but for many the combination of mid-bass thickness and occasional treble bite undercuts the value at this price—earning a moderate score compared with the smoother, more versatile U12t.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio U18T reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B Tech
Bloated BA bass and overly compressed dynamic range. The least "64 Audio" sounding IEM that fails to bridge mainstream tuning and Hi-Fi.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: A- Imaging: B

64 Audio U18T reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8.9 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S Tech

The 64 Audio U18t is a high-end, 18-BA universal IEM that combines the company’s tia tubeless treble driver and apex pressure-relief modules, targeted at reference-grade monitoring and critical listening. Official pricing sits at $2,999, positioning it among the most expensive universal monitors on the market. Specs indicate a four-way design with “1 tia high, 1 high-mid, 8 mid, 8 low” drivers, plus modular isolation via mX/m15/m20 inserts.

Tonal balance trends neutral-bright / mild V: elevated upper-mids and lower treble give strong clarity and bite, while bass is taut and fast but not the last word in physical slam compared to top dynamic-driver sets. This yields exceptional perceived detail and a forward, incisive presentation that some may find analytical on lean recordings. Multiple reviewers characterize it as brighter and more forward than peers, with mid-bass presence but limited macrodynamic weight.

Technical performance is a clear strength: resolution, imaging, and stage width are first-rate, with apex modules helping maintain openness and comfort over long sessions. Staging can approach “open-back” impressions, and the m20 vs m15 modules subtly shift bass/brightness without changing the fundamental FR character. Overall capability is top tier, but at this price the value proposition is contested; buyers prioritizing slam and macro-dynamics may prefer alternatives, while detail chasers will find the U18t a benchmark tool.


Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: A Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S

Fort Ears Mefisto (more reviews)

Fort Ears Mefisto reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 8.4 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S- Tech
Demoed with "Temptation" cable.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: S- Dynamics: S- Details: S- Imaging: S-

Fort Ears Mefisto reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 9.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the Fort Ears Mefisto at an average of 5.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Masterpiece.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

64 Audio U18T User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Fort Ears Mefisto User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U18T Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

Fort Ears Mefisto Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.9

Gaming Grade

B+

64 Audio U18T Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • The balance of resolution and space feels assured, keeping complex passages coherent. Layering is convincing on most studio mixes.
Bass B-
The bass offers steady support without stepping into the spotlight. There's just enough punch for everyday playlists.
Mids B+
The mids are articulate and well-balanced, lending body to instruments. Instrument layering remains stable.
Treble B+
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics B
It handles shifts in volume well, keeping transients lively and controlled. Quiet-to-loud transitions feel natural.
Soundstage S-
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details A+
The tiniest inflections pop into view as if spotlit within the mix. Low-level details feel magnified yet natural.
Imaging A
You can literally point to where sounds originate across the stage. You can point to where sounds originate.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Fort Ears Mefisto Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Expect a tasteful, well-judged response that feels both musical and true to the source. Great synergy with a wide range of genres.

Average Technical Grade

S-
  • The presentation is crisp and expansive, handling complex passages with impressive ease. Low-level details remain audible in quiet passages.
Bass A+
It delivers flagship-worthy bass, rich in both rumble and nuance. Reference tracks showcase its grip.
Mids S-
Midrange quality is superb, rich with resolving power and transparency. Micro-details leap out effortlessly.
Treble S-
It delivers superb treble brilliance that stays pure even in complex passages. It adds excitement while staying pure.
Dynamics S-
You get a masterful mix of slam and finesse across every track. Music breathes with realism.
Details S-
Complex productions unravel completely, letting you examine every thread. Textures are rendered with exquisite finesse.
Imaging S-
Exceptional imaging with holographic precision that creates a palpable sense of placement. It creates a near-holographic placement.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio U18T User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Fort Ears Mefisto User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer