FATFreq Grand Maestro VS 64 Audio U18T

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

FATFreq Grand Maestro and 64 Audio U18T use 1DD+8BA+4EST and 18BA (1 tia high,+1high-mid,+8low)+8mid, driver setups respectively. FATFreq Grand Maestro costs $3,334 while 64 Audio U18T costs $2,999. FATFreq Grand Maestro is $335 more expensive. FATFreq Grand Maestro holds a decisive 1.4-point edge in reviewer scores (8.6 vs 7.2). FATFreq Grand Maestro has significantly better bass with a 2-point edge, FATFreq Grand Maestro has better treble with a 0.7-point edge, FATFreq Grand Maestro has significantly better dynamics with a 2.1-point edge, 64 Audio U18T has significantly better details with a 1.4-point edge and 64 Audio U18T has slightly better imaging with a 0.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric FATFreq Grand Maestro 64 Audio U18T
Bass 7.8 5.8
Mids 6.8 6.6
Treble 7.5 6.8
Details 6.8 8.2
Soundstage 9 8.8
Imaging 7.3 7.5
Dynamics 8.5 6.4
Tonality 8.2 6.9
Technicalities 8.1 7.7
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough 64 Audio U18T reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

FATFreq Grand Maestro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.6

Excellent


64 Audio U18T Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


Reviews Comparison

FATFreq Grand Maestro reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech

The FATFreq Grand Maestro offers a highly adaptable sound signature through its NOAH modules and vocal switches, enabling four distinct tuning profiles. The black NOAH module emphasizes sub-bass "slam," while the blue variant provides tighter "rumble" control; combined with the vocal switch, these allow shifts from a bass-forward signature to a more mid-centric presentation. Bass is deep and authoritative but avoids midrange bleed, while the treble—handled by electrostatic drivers—delivers clarity without sibilance or fatigue.

Technically, it excels in imaging precision and creates an immersive, three-dimensional soundstage that positions instruments with remarkable specificity. However, its large shell size may challenge those with smaller ears, and it demands power-hungry sources—often requiring high-gain amplification to reach full potential. The deluxe package includes both NOAH modules and an upgraded cable, enhancing its tuning flexibility.


64 Audio U18T reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8.9 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
S Tech

The 64 Audio U18t is a high-end, 18-BA universal IEM that combines the company’s tia tubeless treble driver and apex pressure-relief modules, targeted at reference-grade monitoring and critical listening. Official pricing sits at $2,999, positioning it among the most expensive universal monitors on the market. Specs indicate a four-way design with “1 tia high, 1 high-mid, 8 mid, 8 low” drivers, plus modular isolation via mX/m15/m20 inserts.

Tonal balance trends neutral-bright / mild V: elevated upper-mids and lower treble give strong clarity and bite, while bass is taut and fast but not the last word in physical slam compared to top dynamic-driver sets. This yields exceptional perceived detail and a forward, incisive presentation that some may find analytical on lean recordings. Multiple reviewers characterize it as brighter and more forward than peers, with mid-bass presence but limited macrodynamic weight.

Technical performance is a clear strength: resolution, imaging, and stage width are first-rate, with apex modules helping maintain openness and comfort over long sessions. Staging can approach “open-back” impressions, and the m20 vs m15 modules subtly shift bass/brightness without changing the fundamental FR character. Overall capability is top tier, but at this price the value proposition is contested; buyers prioritizing slam and macro-dynamics may prefer alternatives, while detail chasers will find the U18t a benchmark tool.


Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: S- Dynamics: A Soundstage: S- Details: S Imaging: S

FATFreq Grand Maestro (more reviews)

FATFreq Grand Maestro reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 9.5 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
The best basshead set. That is all. EXPENSIVE. If you just want bass HBB Punch way better value.
Youtube Video Summary

FATFreq Grand Maestro aims squarely at a refined, sub-boosted tuning rather than a crude bass cannon. The bass quality shows real pedigree—excellent control, quick decay, and that clean, floor-shaking sub-bass rumble without smearing the mids. Treble reaches higher with better extension than typical basshead fare, and overall resolution, separation, and balance feel “endgame” in polish. For listeners who want muscular low-end that still plays nice with vocals and air, this tuning reads as a mature, high-performance take on “bass + hi-fi.”

But for pure basshead cravings, Grand Maestro doesn’t go overboard—it’s a bassy set, not a “basshead or bust” one. Compared with FATFreq’s own Scarlet Mini (or Maestro Mini), it brings less sheer quantity and “skull-rattle,” trading slam for finesse; next to ultra-dark hammers like HBB Hades, it’s far more balanced and controlled. The catch is diminishing returns: while the Grand Maestro is the most refined and technically capable among these bass-tilted options, those chasing maximum pound-for-pound slam may find better value in the Minis, and those wanting reckless low-end excess will still gravitate to sets like Hades. For most non-basshead audiophiles, though, Grand Maestro’s blend of sub-bass authority and top-end refinement hits the sweet spot.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

FATFreq Grand Maestro reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 9.3 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Is one of those sets that can do it all. Very impressive.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A- Treble: A+ Dynamics: S Soundstage: S

FATFreq Grand Maestro reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: S- Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A Imaging: A

FATFreq Grand Maestro reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 6.5 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
See Maestro SE but with worse bass.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: A- Mids: B Treble: A- Details: B Imaging: A-

FATFreq Grand Maestro reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 9.5 * score rescaled + normalized
7 community members have rated the FatFreq Grand Maestro at an average of 5.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Masterpiece.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

64 Audio U18T (more reviews)

64 Audio U18T reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 7* * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Positioned as a top-of-the-line “reference” set with 18 BAs and a ~$3,000 tag, the 64 Audio U18t brings a brighter tilt than its siblings. With the M15 APEX module, treble gains presence and vocals feel a touch more filled out than on U12t, but the upper range can push into fatigue—sibilant tracks (e.g., CHVRCHES “Graffiti”) come through a bit sharp. Bass emphasis skews mid-bass over sub-bass, adding body yet also a hint of bloat, so the overall balance reads more V/U-shaped than neutral-warm.

Technical ability is still strong—detail retrieval and extension impress without resorting to glare most of the time—but the tuning trade-offs blunt long-term comfort. Versus U12t, U18t is livelier up top yet less forgiving, and U12t’s cleaner, more dynamic low end feels better integrated. Build and fit are solid across the line; the stock cable, however, remains thin and tangle-prone.

End result: a premium, energetic take with sparkle and presence that will appeal to treble-tolerant listeners, but for many the combination of mid-bass thickness and occasional treble bite undercuts the value at this price—earning a moderate score compared with the smoother, more versatile U12t.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio U18T reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 4.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
B Tech
Bloated BA bass and overly compressed dynamic range. The least "64 Audio" sounding IEM that fails to bridge mainstream tuning and Hi-Fi.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C- Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Details: A- Imaging: B

FATFreq Grand Maestro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio U18T User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

FATFreq Grand Maestro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

64 Audio U18T Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.9

Gaming Grade

B-

FATFreq Grand Maestro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • Tuning feels refined, blending frequencies with convincing realism and engagement. Transitions between registers feel effortless.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • Layering is confident and precise, backed by imaging that locks elements firmly in place. Micro-details peek through without sounding forced.
Bass A
The bass hits with conviction, offering both punch and clarity. It reaches low with confidence and control.
Mids B+
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble A
Expect effortless extension and clarity that keep the top end sparkling yet smooth. Layering in upper registers is impressive.
Dynamics S-
The presentation feels expansive, letting micro and macro dynamics breathe. There's a sense of limitless headroom.
Soundstage S
Spatial cues extend effortlessly in every direction, wrapping you in a boundless sonic dome. Every direction feels accessible.
Details B+
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging A-
You can literally point to where sounds originate across the stage. You can point to where sounds originate.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio U18T Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • The balance of resolution and space feels assured, keeping complex passages coherent. Layering is convincing on most studio mixes.
Bass B-
The bass offers steady support without stepping into the spotlight. There's just enough punch for everyday playlists.
Mids B+
The mids are articulate and well-balanced, lending body to instruments. Instrument layering remains stable.
Treble B+
Highs sound lively and extended while remaining controlled. Detail retrieval keeps shimmer intact.
Dynamics B
It handles shifts in volume well, keeping transients lively and controlled. Quiet-to-loud transitions feel natural.
Soundstage S-
Three-dimensional layering becomes effortless, placing performers on a lifelike virtual stage. Venue ambience wraps around convincingly.
Details A+
The tiniest inflections pop into view as if spotlit within the mix. Low-level details feel magnified yet natural.
Imaging A
You can literally point to where sounds originate across the stage. You can point to where sounds originate.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

FATFreq Grand Maestro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio U18T User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer