Aful Explorer VS NiceHCK F1 Pro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Aful Explorer and NiceHCK F1 Pro are in-ear monitors. Aful Explorer costs $120 while NiceHCK F1 Pro costs $90. Aful Explorer is $30 more expensive. Aful Explorer holds a decisive 1.1-point edge in reviewer scores (7.2 vs 6.2). NiceHCK F1 Pro carries a user score of 8. Aful Explorer has better mids with a 0.6-point edge, Aful Explorer has significantly better treble with a 1.1-point edge, Aful Explorer has significantly better dynamics with a 1.6-point edge, NiceHCK F1 Pro has better details with a 0.7-point edge and Aful Explorer has slightly better imaging with a 0.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric Aful Explorer NiceHCK F1 Pro
Bass 7.2 7.2
Mids 6.7 6.2
Treble 7.2 6.2
Details 6.9 7.6
Soundstage 6.3 6.5
Imaging 7 6.6
Dynamics 7.2 5.7
Tonality 7.3 6
Technicalities 7 6.9

Aful Explorer Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


NiceHCK F1 Pro Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.2

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

Aful Explorer reviewed by ATechReviews

ATechReviews 7.4 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
AFUL Explorer is a $120 hybrid that combines powerful, textured bass, smooth non fatiguing mids and treble, and strong technical performance that rivals more expensive sets. Downsides are a sparse accessory pack, non modular cable and an intimate rather than expansive stage. Powerful textured bass with zero bleed, smooth non shouty mids and treble, strong technical performance and a very small, comfortable shell. Sparse accessories, generic tips, non modular cable and an intimate stage that may feel too closed in for some listeners.
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Explorer presents as a compact resin hybrid with a striking galaxy-style faceplate, very low weight and a venting scheme that avoids occlusion, resulting in a secure and comfortable fit even for long sessions. The stock case is practical and pocketable, but the accessory set is minimal, with only generic silicone tips and a fixed, non modular cable that feels soft and usable yet unremarkable at this price.

Sonically, the bass is the stand out: sub bass rumble is described as insane for the price, with powerful, textured impact and mid bass punch that hits hard without bleeding into the lower mids. The lower mids remain clean yet full bodied, giving male vocals and instruments natural thickness, while the upper mids follow a non Harman approach that keeps vocals and instruments energetic but never shouty, shrill or fatiguing even at high volumes. Treble is another strong suit, combining very high detail and air with smooth, incisive cymbal and hi hat reproduction, offering zero sibilance and allowing harsh genres like rock and metal to stay controlled.

In terms of technicalities, the Explorer delivers way above average performance for its bracket, with excellent imaging, clear separation of micro and macro details and dynamics that feel punchy and lively without losing control. The soundstage is more on the intimate side with moderate width but good depth, which enhances vocal focus even if it does not feel as spacious as some rivals. Across comparisons it consistently outperforms well regarded sets such as TruthEar Nova, Kiwi Ears Quartet, AFUL MagicOne and Simgot EM6L in bass quality, resolution and overall balance, and even trades blows with more expensive models like the CKLVX, making it a genuine value gem around the 120 dollar mark for listeners who want powerful clean bass and smooth detail rich treble.

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A+ Dynamics: A Soundstage: B+ Details: A+ Imaging: A+

ATechReviews original ranking

ATechReviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Aful Explorer or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $107.99

Buy Aful Explorer on HiFiGO

NiceHCK F1 Pro reviewed by ATechReviews

ATechReviews 7.3 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
A- Tuning
A Tech
Planar IEM with excellent build, accessories and impactful mid bass focused tuning that offers high detail and wide stage for around 100 dollars, though sub bass roll off, occasional vocal sibilance and average imaging hold it back from being truly all round. Outstanding value planar around 100 dollars with excellent build, comfortable small shells, strong mid bass slam, high detail and wider than average soundstage. Noticeable sub bass roll off, some mid bass bleed and occasional vocal sibilance with only average imaging and dynamics may be problematic for treble sensitive listeners and those who need very neutral tuning.
Youtube Video Summary

The NICEHCK F1 Pro is presented as a compact planar IEM with very light CNC machined shells, a spacious carrying case and a surprisingly premium 4.4 cable, all for around 100 dollars. Build, fit and comfort are described as superb, with the small earpieces sitting securely and the stock upgraded tips and cable meaning there is no real need to spend extra on accessories. Overall package quality and attention to detail feel closer to more expensive competitors, which strongly boosts perceived value.

Sonically the tuning is broadly balanced with a clear focus on mid bass, while sub bass shows a noticeable roll off that reduces deep rumble on dedicated test tracks. Mid bass is described as excellent, detailed and hard hitting, but also slightly overemphasized, adding a bit of bleed into lower mids and giving some male and female vocals a thicker, more bass dominated character. Upper mids and upper treble push vocals and cymbals forward, creating very good clarity and air together with higher than average detail, but also introducing occasional vocal sibilance that can be tamed with foam or different tips.

Technical performance is strong for the price, with higher than average detail retrieval, a soundstage that is wider than many peers and an easy to drive planar driver that remains controlled and snappy even from low gain sources. Imaging and dynamics sit around average, and sets like the Z12 still stand out for superior positional precision and slightly better sub bass extension, but F1 Pro counters with a better cable, more comfortable fit and wider stage. As an overall package around 100 dollars it is portrayed as a genuine market changer that can replace many higher priced planar IEMs, becoming an obvious recommendation between 100 and 200 dollars despite its minor sub bass roll off and vocal sibilance.

Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: B Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: B+

ATechReviews original ranking

ATechReviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your NiceHCK F1 Pro or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $99.99

Buy NiceHCK F1 Pro on HiFiGO

Aful Explorer reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.3 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech
The mids still upset me, but it sounds magical.
Youtube Video Summary

Build & accessories punch above the price: the familiar Aful shell is exceedingly comfortable, light, and easy to seal, with a fit that feels “custom-like.” The new pocketable case has a soft, leathery feel and solid zipper, and the off-white two-pin cable mirrors the Pilgrim’s look and handling—supple, tidy, and on-theme with the Explorer’s subtle “space” aesthetic. Overall presentation feels notably premium for ~\$120.

Tonally, this is a dark, L-shaped tuning with a confident bass shelf and great dynamics, a deliberate 4–6 kHz dip for long-term comfort, and smooth upper-treble “air.” The graph aligns closely to the target aside from a subdued 1.5–4 kHz region, so vocals are relaxed rather than forward—non-fatiguing but not for strict Harman chasers. Versus Performer 8 and 5, Explorer brings deeper bass and a calmer presence region; compared with Magic One, it sounds richer and more organic; against CCA Hydro or PULA PA02, it offers more natural timbre, better build, and stronger value. Stage and mids can feel intimate, and tip selection/modular options are basic, but as a whole it earns a solid 8.1/10 and a full recommendation for listeners wanting a smooth, bass-weighted, non-fatiguing set that “hits different” at this price—akin in spirit to a darker Jupiter, at a tiny fraction of the cost.

Mids: C+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

NiceHCK F1 Pro reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.3 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C- Tech
I like this planar the best of all planars, normally I hate them.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

Aful Explorer reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
Perfect for rock and metal. Smooth, relaxing tuning, great bass with good slam, rich mid-range, safe treble. Upper mids may be too relaxed for some, treble is a bit dark.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

NiceHCK F1 Pro reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A- Tech

Aful Explorer reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
B+ Tech
High volume set, very immersive, scales great with no sharpness, wide staging, enough detail/extension, good bass, just crank it up and enjoy the music.
Youtube Video Summary

Aful Explorer sits around the $100 mark as a set that trades raw resolution for a uniquely relaxing tuning. At mid volume it’s a smooth, non-fatiguing listen with vocals a touch pulled back, a gentle upper-mids scoop, and a roll-off past ~15 kHz—so don’t expect sparkle or air in that range. The magic happens when it’s cranked: the set scales exceptionally, staying silky even loud, vocals come forward more naturally, and staging gets that wrap-around, immersive feel without turning sharp thanks to restrained 3 kHz energy.

Against pricier or punchier peers: versus Da Vinci, Explorer’s low-end has tighter mid-bass separation and quicker decay, but it doesn’t slam as hard; Da Vinci is more resolving, extended, and better balanced at mid volume, while Explorer becomes the more engulfing listen once volume climbs. Compared with the S8 planar, Explorer brings deeper sub-bass and fuller notes but a softer attack and less upper-mid/treble detail; the S8 stays cleaner, faster, and a bit brighter, thriving at moderate levels, whereas Explorer is the turn-it-up specialist.

For alternatives, Ziigaat Cinno is the cleaner, more airy take with sharper imaging and higher detail (with hints of BA timbre) and leaner sub-bass; Explorer hits harder, deeper, and stays smoother and more “musical.” CKVX offers a fuller low-end with a more pushed-back stage and better mid-volume resolution, while Explorer is the intimate, high-volume pool-of-sound. Magic One runs the warmest, with huskier vocals and mid-bass-centric weight that suits drums/rock/jazz but lacks the Explorer’s sub-bass presence and immersion. Net: if playlists lean hip-hop, rock, R&B, or lo-fi and volume tends to be lively, Explorer is a standout flavor; for quieter sessions or a priority on air and micro-detail, look to Chino/S8/CKVX. Both Explorer and Chino make compelling side-grades to the usual Harman-ish suspects like Nova and Supermix 4 without bruising the wallet.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

NiceHCK F1 Pro reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech
A cheaper S12. Almost identical sound and tuning. Good value. Look for aliexpress deals.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Aful Explorer (more reviews)

Aful Explorer reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
An amazing hybrid. Trades blows with the S08. Gorgeous Shells
Youtube Video Summary

Aful Explorer debuts at $120 with a clever blend of the Performer series’ RLC crossover and the Magic One’s 3D-printed resonators. The package is generous: a compact blue suede case, a silvery two-wire cable (3.5mm, also available in 4.4), and six tip pairs. The resin shells are neatly finished, pressure-relieved, and lightweight; the nozzles have open bores (mind debris—tips with mesh help). Comfort follows the usual semi-custom story: when the shape matches, they disappear; when it doesn’t, they don’t. The softer white stock tips work better than the stiffer blue cores, and SpinFit swaps (CP145/CP100) can improve retention. Aesthetic verdict from the “council”: sparkly blue with silver cable gets compliments.

Tonally, Explorer leans warm-neutral with a fun low-end. Sub-bass digs deep with tactile rumble, mid-bass adds weight without bloat, and the single DD keeps it tight. The mids are the star—natural, even, and unmasked; instruments and vocals sit correctly without husk or nasality. Up top, the treble is smooth and relaxed yet still resolves detail; cymbal timbre and vocal overtones decay cleanly without glare, inviting volume increases without fatigue. Technicals are quietly confident: clear separation, tidy imaging with some depth from the bass foundation, and a stage that feels average in size but organized. Sensitivity is high and impedance low, making them easy to drive from phones, tablets, and laptops.

Against peers, Explorer feels special under $300. Versus Letshuoer S08, Explorer is the more neutral and laid-back partner with a touch more sub-bass, while S08 adds upper-mid and mid-bass energy for a slightly more “exciting” tilt (Opera favors Explorer; classical often flatters S08). Performer 5 is more balanced with lighter bass and forward mids, and ZiiGaat Doscinco brings a warmed-up V-shape with bigger slam and more treble energy. Net-net: Explorer is a superb all-rounder with unique, well-executed tuning, standout accessories (that case!), and beautiful shells. The only asterisk is fit—try before you buy or use a friendly return policy. If the S08 felt too warm or planar-flavored, Explorer’s smoother hybrid take should be near the very top of the shortlist.


Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Aful Explorer reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Aful Explorer hits way, way above its bracket. Tuning snaps into focus with impact, cohesion, and smoothness that feel “stupid good” for $120—the kind of price that triggers a double-take. Expect a balanced, warm-leaning presentation that takes volume like a champ and turns kick drums into head-hugging thunder without smearing detail. Timbre is clean, clarity pops, staging gets big and immersive, and bass boost toggles aren’t required to have fun. Call it a giant killer, an easy 10/10, and a “top five of the year” contender that begs for playlist shuffles—from anime scores to classic synths—while scaling noticeably with better amps.

Build is light and comfy with twinkly blue faceplates, flush 2-pin sockets, and a stock cable that’s nicely twisted and terminated in 4.4 mm (full approval), though the ear hooks are thick and springy—softening the bend helps. The nozzle is a simple open port (no mesh), so keep ears clean. Accessories include multiple silicone tips and a compact, rubberized case that’s genuinely pocketable. Inside, it’s a 1DD + 2BA hybrid with a proper electronic crossover, 3D-printed acoustics, and pressure-balance tech; on paper it’s 26 Ω and “easy to power,” in practice it plays nicely from affordable dongles yet still rewards class-A and tubes with extra body and space. Minor QC quirks (a cosmetic cable sleeve can slip; easily fixable or just swap cables) don’t blunt the verdict: this is Aful’s most exciting budget brawler to date, out-punching the Performer series on pure fun-per-euro.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Aful Explorer reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Relaxed upper mid-range. Vocals sound a little bit more forward than instruments. Smooth treble performance.
Youtube Video Summary

Aful Explorer is a $120 hybrid (1DD + 2BA) that breaks from the brand’s usual neutral-with-sub-bass tilt and goes for a warm, bass-tilted signature. The package is simple but well chosen: two full sets of tips, a compact, soft-touch zip case, and a handsome stock cable available in 3.5 mm or 4.4 mm (with a secure chin slider and standard 2-pin). The semi-custom acrylic shells are medium-small, comfy, and stable—even suitable for side-sleepers—with above-average isolation and sensible venting. Overall build and ergonomics punch above the price.

Tonally, Explorer delivers satisfying impact with both sub-bass rumble and enough mid-bass to give kick drums real punch. Upper-mids are a touch relaxed, so vocals sit more within the mix rather than spotlighted. Treble is smooth yet carries a bit of sparkle for definition; despite graphs suggesting limited “air,” the timbre and perceived clarity are well judged. Stage favors depth over width, and the overall presentation stays engaging without stridency or mud—warm, dense, but not soupy.

Against peers, it’s the warmest pick here: more bass-rich than the Truthear Hexa (which remains the vocal-friendly warm-neutral choice), fuller and more polished than the older FiiO FH3 (though FH3 still throws a slightly wider image), and punchier than the single-BA Aful Magic One. Explorer is also the most distinctive AFUL tuning to date and arguably the most fun—especially for listeners prioritizing bass satisfaction over vocal focus. Verdict: a confident 4 stars for an entry-level IEM that brings a fresh flavor to AFUL’s lineup.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Aful Explorer reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Rating: A- | Value: ⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮 | Comfort: 8 wide and unique warm tuning relaxed vocals and treble

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Aful Explorer reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7 Reviewer Score
Relaxed and fun. Easy to listen to. A bit darker than my preferrd signature but I enjoyed this quite a bit.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Aful Explorer reviewed by Audio-In Reviews

Audio-In Reviews 6.8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
AFUL Explorer offers a natural, slightly warm tuning with strong sub bass, smooth non fatiguing treble and very solid value around the 100 dollar mark, held back mainly by modest stage size, relaxed mids and only average top end air and micro detail. Natural slightly warm tuning with strong dynamic bass, smooth controlled treble and one of the most balanced overall presentations in the current 100 dollar class. Bass bleed into the lower mids, relaxed vocal presence, narrow stage and limited upper treble air prevent the Explorer from reaching truly standout technical performance.
Youtube Video Summary

AFUL Explorer arrives as the most affordable entry in the AFUL lineup, carrying a three driver hybrid configuration with one dynamic driver and two balanced armatures in a small 3D printed resin shell. The shell feels light, secure and well shaped, with an easy fit that should work for many ears, while the gradient blue sparkle faceplate gives a subtle night sky vibe that ties nicely into the Explorer theme. The stock cable is clearly a budget unit and can feel slightly plasticky and stiff, but it behaves well enough in daily use, and the included case and tip selection round out a package that feels very solid at roughly 119 dollars.

Sonically, Explorer follows a relaxed upper midrange approach similar to the AFUL Performer series, combining a touch of extra low mid and mid bass energy with a more laid back vocal region for a smooth and natural presentation. The dynamic driver delivers strong sub bass extension and satisfying slam with good dynamics, even if the transition into the mids is not perfectly controlled and brings a hint of bass bleed that slightly softens lower mid clarity. Male vocals and instruments benefit from the added warmth and weight, while vocal presence remains sufficiently forward to stay engaging even if a little more pinna gain energy would be welcome. Lower treble rises enough to give guitars bite and cymbals sparkle, but Explorer impressively avoids the harshness, sibilance and splashiness that often plague sets in this range, keeping treble smooth yet controlled and adding a healthy dose of detail without ever becoming aggressive.

Upper treble does roll off past 10 kilohertz, so air, shimmer and the very finest micro detail are slightly restrained, and the overall Sound Stage remains on the intimate and somewhat narrow side, though imaging is still decent and positional cues are easy to pick out. Detail retrieval sits comfortably in line with other good options around this price rather than standing out as a technical monster, but taken as a whole the Explorer gets a lot right and sidesteps many of the usual budget pitfalls. With some of the best bass and most natural midrange at this price point combined with treble that is unusually well behaved for the segment, Explorer joins the top tier of sub 150 dollar options and stands as one of the most compelling all round budget IEM choices for listeners who value a relaxed but engaging tuning over maximum stage width or hyper analytical detail.

Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B- Details: B Imaging: B+

Audio-In Reviews original ranking

Audio-In Reviews Youtube Channel

Aful Explorer reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 6.8 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Details: B+ Imaging: B+

Aful Explorer reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 6.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: B Mids: B+ Treble: B+ Soundstage: B+ Details: B+ Imaging: B+

Aful Explorer reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8 * score rescaled + normalized
28 community members have rated the AFUL Explorer at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

NiceHCK F1 Pro (more reviews)

NiceHCK F1 Pro reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 6.3 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
B- Tuning
A- Tech
Affordable planar with classic bright, lean tuning and strong technical performance, but out of the box it can sound a bit thin with smaller, more distant vocals unless EQ is applied. Speedy, detailed planar driver with solid build, good clarity and excellent EQ headroom to add bass weight and smooth treble. Stock tuning is bright and lean with lighter bass impact, somewhat distant mids and a flatter, less natural presentation unless EQ is used.
Youtube Video Summary

NiceHCK F1 Pro is presented as a straightforward affordable planar that delivers the classic planar experience at a lower price point. The shell and cable are solid and the overall tuning sits in the same family as sets like Timeless and S12, with a bright, lean tilt, speedy transient response and very articulate, detailed presentation that clearly shows off the technical capability of the driver.

The bass level is generally acceptable but tuned on the lighter side, giving impact that can feel flatter and shallower than expected, while the mids come across lighter in weight with vocals that sound smaller and a bit more distant than ideal. Treble has a slight extra boost that adds clarity and detail without completely dominating, but together with the leaner mid bass it pushes the whole signature toward a brighter, less natural tonality, with a stage that has decent space yet can feel somewhat flat and lacking depth.

Where the F1 Pro stands out is in how well the driver responds to EQ. Adding sub bass and mid bass and trimming a bit of treble makes the set sound fuller and more impactful, brings the mids forward, and takes some of the planar timbre edge off, nudging the response closer to a more natural or even Harman inspired shape. For listeners who enjoy a brighter, leaner planar sound and are willing to EQ, F1 Pro offers much of the technical performance of the classic planar gang at a more accessible price, even if the stock tuning is not the most universally friendly.

Bass: B Mids: B- Treble: B Dynamics: B- Soundstage: B Details: A-

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

NiceHCK F1 Pro reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A+ Tech
Cheaper S12 Pro/ Z12

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A-

Aful Explorer User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

NiceHCK F1 Pro User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 2 user reviews

8

Very Positive

Aful Explorer Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.1

Gaming Grade

A-

NiceHCK F1 Pro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

Aful Explorer Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • A smooth, agreeable balance keeps the presentation engaging without obvious flaws. Only sensitive ears will nitpick the bumps.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass A-
It serves up confident rumble and texture while keeping the spectrum balanced. You can enjoy bass-heavy music without fatigue.
Mids B+
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble A-
The treble is exquisitely tuned, combining crystal detail with relaxed delivery. Micro-details emerge effortlessly.
Dynamics A-
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage B
You can map the ensemble with confidence thanks to solid spacing and coherent depth layering. Ambient effects feel believable.
Details B+
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances that keeps complex passages intelligible. Micro-details pop without sounding forced.
Imaging A-
Each element locks into a steady coordinate even as the mix grows dense. Imaging holds even during busy segments.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

NiceHCK F1 Pro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • The tuning leans easygoing, yet occasional unevenness nudges it away from greatness. A bit of EQ polish can smooth things nicely.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • It offers a competent showing, maintaining cohesion on straightforward arrangements. Complex passages start to challenge it, but never derail the show.
Bass A-
Expect a commanding bass response that reaches deep without clouding the mix. There's both slam and nuance in equal measure.
Mids B
Expect a confident midrange that keeps details audible without harshness. Acoustic arrangements sound engaging.
Treble B
Expect crisp, well-balanced treble that keeps shimmer intact. You hear reverbs decay naturally.
Dynamics B-
It offers fair punch and contrast, though micro-dynamics could be sharper. Impact is satisfying for day-to-day use.
Soundstage B+
The presentation supplies a believable venue outline where each instrument owns its pocket of space. The stage opens up nicely for live cuts.
Details A
Resolution feels both high and relaxed, capturing nuance with ease. There's zero smearing even at high volume.
Imaging B+
Good imaging with precise instrument placement and clear front/back localization. Positions snap into place convincingly.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

Aful Explorer User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

NiceHCK F1 Pro User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
Y yorxx
7

Harman 2019 Tuning.

Tuning: B Tech: A- Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: B Details: A- Imaging: A+
Pros
Good technicalities,Great clarity, Great image, Good details, Bass precise, Bright treble.
Cons
Sometimes Noisy, Sometimes very bright.
F filipe
9

Came from the Tri i3 MK3, which was amazing for female vocals but too thin for everything else. The F1 Pro feels fuller and more balanced while keeping clarity. Symbolic by Death sounded open and detailed

Tuning: A+ Tech: A Bass: A+ Mids: A- Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: S- Details: S- Imaging: A+
Pros
Excellent balance between bass and clarity, great separation and soundstage. Fast and controlled bass with good punch, natural mids (somehow), and "smooth" treble (overall). Comfortable and easy to play with my Fosi Q4.
Cons
Think I need to hear a better IEM to know what could be improved lol

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer