Aful Performer 5+2 VS Ziigaat Arcanis

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Aful Performer 5+2 and Ziigaat Arcanis use 2DD+4BA+1Planar and 2DD+5BA driver setups respectively. Aful Performer 5+2 costs $229 while Ziigaat Arcanis costs $399. Ziigaat Arcanis is $170 more expensive. Aful Performer 5+2 holds a slight 0.2-point edge in reviewer scores (7.6 vs 7.4). Ziigaat Arcanis carries a user score of 8.5. Aful Performer 5+2 has significantly better bass with a 1.1-point edge, Ziigaat Arcanis has slightly better treble with a 0.4-point edge, Aful Performer 5+2 has slightly better dynamics with a 0.3-point edge and Ziigaat Arcanis has significantly better details with a 1.3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Aful Performer 5+2 Ziigaat Arcanis
Bass 7.9 6.8
Mids 7.7 7.9
Treble 7.2 7.6
Details 7.2 8.5
Soundstage 7.2 7.3
Imaging 7.2 7.4
Dynamics 7.3 7
Tonality 7.6 7.9
Technicalities 7.5 8.1

Aful Performer 5+2 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.6

Strongly Favorable


Ziigaat Arcanis Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8.5 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

Naming drama aside (P5+2? just call it Performer 7), this Aful packs a quirky driver party: 2DD for low end, 4 BA split across mids/treble, plus a tiny micro-planar for the highest sparkle, all marshaled by Aful’s neat miniature crossover. The shells are lightweight, comfy and prettier than they need to be; the cable feels “don’t bother swapping” nice, with 3.5 or 4.4 options. The box is loaded with silicone tips but no foam—a miss, because the right seal changes everything. Price target sits around $250, which sets expectations high but not ridiculous.

Stock silicone yields a surgical, respectful tuning with bass that skews neutral and controlled. Swap to well-sealing foam or hybrids and feed a juicy source (warm Class A or tubes) and the set wakes up—stage snaps into a cohesive scene right in front, imaging gets laser-etched, and that micro-planar adds a pinch-of-salt treble spice without turning harsh. It’s an up-close presentation—sometimes almost claustrophobically detailed—in the best way: think “men with trumpets in the head,” precise placement, and excellent extension up top. Not as rowdy as the Explorers; more like a surgeon in a Hawaiian shirt—technical, but with a wink.

Practical upside: the clarity and positioning make this great for gaming and even viable for mixing/mastering checks; just don’t crank it into pain territory. Bass stays tight and responsive, treble sails high, and coherence holds. Tip and source matter a lot: with foam + warm power, it sings; with plain silicone, it’s merely polite. Final tally: a confident 8.5/10—doing a lot right at its price, dinged half a point for making everyone do math on the name.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Aful Performer 5+2 or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $213

Buy Aful Performer 5+2 on HiFiGO

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Arcanis, priced at $379, immediately raises eyebrows with its cheap packaging and accessories. The included 3.5mm cable is deemed insufficient, especially for the low 12-ohm impedance, and the IEM shells themselves have an unfortunate mold-like appearance. The basic case and lack of balanced cable option feel mismatched for the price tag. Simply put, the unboxing experience and stock accessories scream budget, not near $400.

Getting great sound out of the Arcanis requires significant aftermarket investment. The stock cable must be swapped for a high-quality, low-impedance cable (like Effect Audio) and the stock tips replaced with Velvet tips to fix staging compression and treble issues. Pairing with a powerful, capable amplifier is also essential. Once these costly upgrades are made, the 2DD + 5BA configuration truly shines, delivering excellent clarity, a unique "gooey" texture, and surprisingly good detail retrieval. However, the soundstage is notably intimate, with everything happening "behind the eyeballs", lacking the width found in competitors.

Ultimately, the Arcanis offers genuinely excellent sound quality that justifies a $400 tag – but only after spending significantly more on cables, tips, and amplification. The stock experience feels like a $300 product hampered by the included accessories and questionable shell design. It's a frustratingly high-maintenance IEM; you absolutely can achieve top-tier performance, but the effort and extra cost required make the overall value proposition hard to swallow at full price.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Ziigaat Arcanis or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $399

Buy Ziigaat Arcanis on Linsoul

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
It's spicy treble is something to watch out for, it's unique.
Youtube Video Summary

Aful Performer 5+2 lands as a hybrid of the beloved Performer 5 and the punchier Explorer. The unboxing is the familiar P5 affair—same case, same style of tips—nothing flashy, but solid. The shell mirrors the P5 in size with a comfy little stabilizing wing that locks in well. No metal nozzle or front filter here, yet tip retention is secure and hassle-free. The flat 2-pin socket is straightforward, and the stock cable feels thick and supple with a reliable chin slider and handy red/blue channel markers. Overall: understated build, great ergonomics, daily-driver ready.

Sonically, this one aims neutral with a very distinct top end—clean, dynamic, incisive. Think switching from black-and-white to color; cymbals and overtones pop with a slightly crunchy/pristine edge that energizes detail without turning harsh on good recordings. Bass isn’t about sheer quantity; it’s about slam and dynamics—quick on the draw, well-controlled, and satisfying when called upon. Vocals sit a notch forward, microdetail is strong, and the overall presentation is coherent, clear, and technical with convincing stage, resolution, and imaging. Not a treble-shy or bass-bombed tuning—more a refined all-rounder for those who want clarity and bite.

Versus the original P5, the 5+2 fixes the missing “air” and soft edges, trading them for crisper transients and better extension. Compared with Explorer (a value champ), the 5+2 brings superior upper-treble reach, detail, and vocal focus. Against Performer 8 and Cantor, it feels more visceral—the P8 is smoother and more relaxed, while Cantor pulls finer microdetail but with less bass slam. Sets like Dino Quattro or J’s Estrella bring bigger fun or treble theatrics, yet the 5+2’s balance and everyday versatility win more often. Net take: a neutral-leaning, highly technical upgrade that stands tall in its bracket—easy to recommend to anyone chasing clarity, speed, and controlled impact over pure warmth or excess bass.

Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Lots of good neutral energy here. Interesting set up.
Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Arcanis, priced at $400 as the brand's most expensive standalone IEM, presents a mixed bag outside of its core sound. Build quality is decent but unremarkable, featuring comfortable shells with a well-fitting nozzle, though the aesthetic is described as slightly "weird." The included cable feels distinctly mid-tier and underwhelming for the price, while the case shows noticeable fraying almost immediately, contributing to an absolutely horrific unboxing experience deemed unacceptable at this cost.

Sonically, the Arcanis is a deeply divisive set with an extremely dark tilt and a significant dip around 6kHz. Initial impressions can be harsh or disappointing, but extended listening reveals its strengths: pure, clean sound free of sibilance or harshness, quality bass, clean highs, and beautiful vocals. This unique tuning philosophy creates a smooth, sophisticated, and non-fatiguing presentation. While the $230 Odyssey is praised as a fantastic value and the second-best in Ziigaat's lineup, the Arcanis is considered sonically superior, offering a more refined experience – albeit only marginally better for some. It competes favorably against sets like the Mega5EST and Dunu DaVinci, and surprisingly challenges far pricier offerings like the $1,800 Apostle in tonal beauty, though the Apostle has more "show." The $320 Volume S is a close competitor with a different, brighter tonality, making the Arcanis's value proposition relative.

Ultimately, the Arcanis shines as a beautifully dark, serious, and smooth IEM that excels at high volumes without becoming offensive. It delivers great detail without fatigue, standing out in a market saturated with energetic tunings. Despite the subpar accessories and unboxing befitting a much cheaper product, its unique and effective sound signature makes it a highly recommended pick under $400 for those seeking a refined, non-sibilant listen, though the Odyssey remains the smarter choice for budget-conscious buyers.

Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 8 * score rescaled + normalized
Evolution of the Performer 5 tuning. Smoother, airier treble, deeper, punchier bass. Fantastic All-rounder with incredible resolution for the price. 2-Pin connectors have some quality issues
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Performer 5+2 (Performer 7 / P7) takes the P5 recipe and adds a second 6 mm dynamic for the lows and a micro-planar for the highs, nudging MSRP to $240. Unboxing mirrors the P5: nine pairs of tips and a decent case, but the accessories feel bare-bones at this price—no foam tips and a non-modular cable, even though the included 8-wire is supple and well-behaved. Build is classic AFUL: 3D-printed resin, blended nozzle (no mesh or lip—watch tip retention), single rear vent, and striking blue-green mosaic shells inspired by Suzhou gardens—cool-wall approved with four compliments to one “meh.” Fit is semi-custom and a touch chunkier than P5; comfortable for most, a conditional pass for small ears. Note a sporadic batch quirk: some units have over-tight 2-pin sockets; exchanges fixed it for affected buyers.

Tuning sits in warm-leaning neutral territory. The dual dynamics deliver punchy, textured bass that rumbles without bloating; guitars and drums carry convincing weight. Mids are the star—rich, full-bodied, vocal-forward without shout, with clean separation and natural tone. Treble from the micro-planar is smooth yet energetic: cymbals and vocal harmonics sparkle, special effects have bite and body, and only treble-sensitives may find hot mixes a bit lively. Technicalities impress for the money—detail retrieval and nuance feel a class up—while stage and imaging are solid rather than showy.

Against peers: the Tangzu x HBB budget pick mirrors the overall tonality but P7 offers higher resolution and more treble finesse; the planar “Heyday” alternative is brighter/faster with leaner bass; versus Performer 5, P7 brings tighter low-end, smoother treble, and better extremes detail; the Fresh-collab competitor pushes vocals further forward with bigger stage but leaner lower mids. Verdict: a versatile all-rounder that suits broad libraries and even content creation thanks to its balanced tonality and detail. Not for bassheads, trebleheads, or strict Harman-lean seekers, and the accessory pack/cable quirk holds it back from a slam-dunk. For roughly $240, though, it’s a brilliant, resolving upgrade in the AFUL line.


Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 6 * score rescaled + normalized
A more vocal focused, more detailed version of the Lush, with an interesting anti-sibilance dip in the treble. Makes for a detailed, buy still relaxing, slightly unnautral treble presentation. Accessories are woeful for the price.
Youtube Video Summary

Ziigaat’s Arcanis takes the familiar house recipe and pushes it to the brand’s $400 tier, but the presentation still screams mid-range: the same case, tips, and cable show up again, which feels deflating at this price. The resin shells (metal nozzles, rear vent) are comfy for larger ears, though driver flex can pop up and tiny ears may struggle to seal. Styling leans nautical “tide-pool”; on the Cool Wall it looks neat, yet the Council of Ladies verdict is lukewarm. Inside sits a seven-driver hybrid with Ziigaat’s “dual 10 mm” tube-loaded dynamics plus BAs, easy to drive and slightly reactive to impedance (a mild V and a touch more sub-bass with adapters).

Sonically this is neutral-leaning with bass that favors quality over quantity: textured drops, tidy kick definition, and clean lower mids with no bleed. Female vocals pop a step forward, while upper-mids/treble show a polite attack—great for treble-sensitive listeners and high-volume sessions, but a bit soft for those craving bite and air. Technicals read as “very good, not killer”: excellent low-end texture, solid imaging and width, but treble detail doesn’t wow versus peers. An impedance adapter or “Rudy-rod” style cable can add welcome sub-bass without breaking the balance.

Against the field: the Arete (≈$250) brings more bass quantity and crisper treble, yet Arcanis wins on bass control/texture. The Hisenior Mega 5 EST (≈$550) is more V-shaped and more resolving, but less safe up top; Arcanis suits treble-sensitive vocals lovers. AFUL Performer 7 (≈$240) punches up with extra bass and sparkle and can feel more detailed per dollar. And at price parity, Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk matches or edges bass texture, adds airier treble, and ships a far better accessory pack. Verdict: a jack-of-all-trades with genuinely refined bass texture, balanced tonality, and treble safety that many will enjoy—yet the price and accessories dull the shine. On the Audio Amigo scale, this winds up in “but I like this”, especially for listeners who prefer smooth upper harmonics and long, loud sessions without fatigue.


Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Overall it is sounding more visceral and incisive than the Performer 5.
Youtube Video Summary

Aful’s Performer 5+2 upgrades the original hybrid with 2DD + 4BA + 1 micro-planar tweeter and lands around $240–$250. The unboxing is practical: three sets of silicone tips, a pocketable puck case, and a soft, nicely draping cable (available in 4.4 or 3.5), though the braid can look a bit loose and the pre-formed hooks run large. The resin shells shift between blue and green under different light; fit is medium-large, very stable, and comfortable once the right tips are found. Note the narrow nozzle without a retaining lip and partially exposed bores/filters—tip grip is key and a little care prevents ear-gunk ingress.

Tonally this leans mild V-shaped: a clean midrange with a confident bass boost, a touch of lower-treble presence for bite, and well-extended air up top. The result is more incisive and punchy than the original P5, with clearer on/off transients that aid separation and layering. Trade-offs show as a hint of gritty/plasticky treble texture on cymbals and brushes—not harsh, but less natural than ideal—while the bass stays tight and exciting.

Against Aful’s Explorer, this sounds brighter, more spacious, and more technical; Explorer plays warmer/denser with smoother treble but less openness. Versus the pricier Thieaudio Oracle MK3, tuning is broadly similar: Oracle is smoother and deeper with a softer attack, while the Performer 5+2 brings more snap and engagement for less money. As a modern mid-tier hybrid, it absolutely still has a place—energetic, spacious, and well-executed—earning a solid four stars.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized
Not really stand out at the price range. Lack a bit of definition. Decent IEM
Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Arcanis offers a warm, somewhat thick sound signature with a noticeable bass boost and a lean lower midrange. This is balanced by a relaxed upper midrange and lower treble, contributing to its overall smooth character. While it provides decent extension, the Arcanis can occasionally present vocals with a slightly wet or near-sibilant edge, especially depending on ear tip choice and fit depth. Its transient response is sharper than the Yanyin Canon Pro, giving it better definition and crisper imaging, though the bass physicality is only middling.

Physically, the Arcanis features lightweight plastic shells with a distinctive dark black and green aesthetic. However, the build quality feels somewhat cheap for the $400 price point, especially paired with the included thin, glossy cable. The shells are notably long, leading to a fit that can feel deep and occasionally aggressive in the ear canal, exacerbated by the stock ear tips. Users may experience noticeable driver flex or squish when inserting them. Comfort is generally acceptable for upright listening but becomes problematic when lying on your side.

Ultimately, the Arcanis earns a three-star rating. While it delivers a generally inoffensive, warm sound with decent technicalities like transient bite and imaging, it lacks standout qualities or strong definition at its price. The physical experience, particularly the fit and perceived build quality, further holds it back from being a compelling recommendation. It ends up feeling like a competent but unremarkable offering in its tier.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Slightly warm leaning balanced signature - Very engaging, decent clarity. Slight metallic/digital sheen but it's not too bad.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 7.5 Reviewer Score
Vocal centric with good bass performance and smooth but well extended treble. Excellent techs. I think they mixed up the names for their recent releases - this is less "neutral" and more "lush" than the Lush. Priced steeply but for the tuning style, not much else competes except maybe the Mangird Tea 2, but the Tea 2 is discontinued.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Clean, balanced, neutral sound with good layering and tech. Relaxing vocals, but lacks power and last bit of vocal extension. Bass has good controll, but lacks impact. Has sizzly planar timbre in the treble. Safe but forgettable.
Youtube Video Summary

Performer 7 lands with a neutral-balanced, laid-back tuning and good treble reach. The presentation is clean and generally safe, though there’s a touch of sizzly “planar-ish” timbre up top. Technicals are solid for ~$200—slightly behind sets like Quintet and Super Mix 4, about on par with Nova. Bass from the dual 6 mm DDs is tight, controlled, and free of bleed, but lacks the slam and rumble of competitors using larger drivers; mids are well separated with decent layering.

The weak spot is vocal extension: a push around 1.5 kHz tries to bring them forward, but a dip through 3–6 kHz keeps them from opening up. Tamer upper-mids help avoid fatigue for rock/metal, yet the modest low-end impact leaves drums and basslines feeling uneventful. It’s a mid-volume set that doesn’t scale well—turning it up accentuates the 1.5 kHz emphasis and treble sizzle. Treble isn’t peaky, just a bit glassy at times; for K-pop the smoother mids can work if less extended vocals are acceptable.

As a value play, there are stronger options: Nova, Chopan, and Super Mix 4 offer better bang-for-buck; for a similar clean/neutral target, Tanchjim Origin sounds more natural with better bass texture and vocal reach, and DynaQuattro adds sub-bass and fuller vocals—none with the planar-ish timbre. Even AFUL’s own P5 is cheaper and more fun, while the Explorer undercuts the price and scales impressively. In today’s crowded market, P7 is a competent all-rounder but not distinctive enough to stand out.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 8 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
A+ Tech
My favourite vocals under $500 (best imo). A more refined OG Mangird Tea with better resolution and tech. Recommend listening at higher volumes on slower vocal centric tracks. Don't rec hiphop or genres that needs lots of sub-bass. Can get spicy with kpop/jpop at higher volumes/don'r rec blastin with more energetic tracks, but sounds good at mid vol. Pin point imaging and open staging, good for gaming.
Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Arcanis positions itself as a potential new vocal benchmark under $500, offering a clean yet full sound signature. A slight boost from 6 to 15kHz makes the upper mids and early treble pop out, adding extra dynamics without becoming sharp or fatiguing. Essentially, the Arcanis is a smoother, more resolving, and more spacious evolution of the original Mangird TEs, retaining their essence but with greater refinement. Vocals, the main attraction, are exceptionally clear, natural, resolving, and open, featuring the "special sauce" – a distinct bite to consonants that enhances dynamics and emotional impact. This is achieved through a careful balance: a cut at 3-6k reduces sharpness and fatigue, while a gradual rise from 800Hz to 2kHz pushes vocals slightly forward for clarity, and the 6-15k boost provides essential extension and openness.

Technical performance is impressive, with a notably open stage, pinpoint imaging, and excellent micro-details, making it great for gaming, OSTs, and classical. The bass is quick, well-textured, resolving, and controlled, offering good slam without bleeding. However, it lacks the deep sub-bass extension for genres like hip-hop or EDM, where sets like the Estrella or Dusk outperform. Scaling is crucial: busy pop or EDM tracks sound best at mid-volumes (around 60-65 dB) to prevent the treble bite from becoming overwhelming, while slower ballads and acoustics truly shine and open up at higher volumes (around 80 dB+), revealing micro-nuances and emotional depth.

Comparisons highlight the Arcanis's strengths. It's more technical and spacious than the Volume S (warmer, better for male vocals) and Studio 4 (fuller, more neutral), offering superior treble air and detail. It outpaces the RS5 in technicalities and value, though the RS5 has fuller male vocals. Against the Oracle MK1, the Arcanis boasts better treble extension, micro-details, dynamics, and that crucial vocal bite. While bright-neutral sets like the Dusk or Meta have more bass and treble emphasis, the Arcanis feels more natural and musical, especially in vocals and bass texture. Compared to Ziigaat's own Odyssey, the Arcanis is cleaner, more technical, more vocal-focused, and airier, while the Odyssey is bassier, darker, and scales better for hip-hop/rock. Despite its strengths, the accessories and cable feel unacceptably basic for the $400 price point. Ultimately, the Arcanis is highly recommended for higher-volume listening on vocal-focused tracks, but other options might be better all-rounders for mid-volume pop or bass-heavy genres.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 6.1 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
B Tuning
B- Tech
AFUL Performer 5+2 is a vocal focused hybrid with strong sub bass but a small, intimate stage and uneven treble. It will work best for listeners who want vocals up front and can tolerate some brightness and congestion. Very forward, engaging vocals with solid sub bass level and a relatively smooth overall tone at moderate volumes. Small, flat stage with limited separation and an energetic treble that can sound sharp and unnatural, especially around sibilants.
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Performer 5+2 takes the familiar hybrid recipe of dual 6 mm dynamics, four balanced armatures and a micro planar and spins it into a distinctly vocal focused presentation. Vocals are pushed very close, giving an intimate, close talker character that will immediately stand out from more typical U shaped hybrids. This forwardness comes at a cost, as the overall soundstage feels flatter and smaller than many competitors, with the midrange taking center stage at the expense of a more spacious image.

The dual 6 mm drivers deliver a sub bass tilted low end that has respectable rumble and enough level to support genres that appreciate extra weight, while avoiding obvious boom or bloat. Impact and tactility are on the softer side, and combined with the elevated midrange and treble, bass presence tends to sit very close to the vocals rather than carving out its own layer. This crowding effect, together with the warm, smoothed textures, means layering and separation never really open up, giving the Performer 5+2 a more compact, blended presentation than many modern tribrids.

The treble region is where the tuning feels least controlled, with peaks across the upper mids, presence and air bands that can bring out snare hits and sibilants and push the micro planar into an overdriven, slightly unnatural timbre. The intended advantage of the micro planar is largely lost in this boost, keeping overall technicalities such as detail retrieval, imaging precision and stage depth firmly in the moderate camp rather than a clear step up from AFULs other models. As a result, Performer 5+2 emerges as a niche choice for listeners who strongly prioritize upfront vocals and do not mind a smaller, more intense stage, while those looking for a more balanced, spacious and natural presentation will likely find better options elsewhere.

Bass: A- Mids: B+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B- Soundstage: C+ Details: B- Imaging: B-

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 7.7 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Neutral-bright, low-volume–optimized tuning with airy treble and clean mids; technical and engaging. Accessories feel dated and the fit/nozzle could be refined. Airy treble and clean, forward vocals deliver strong technical clarity at lower volumes. Lean bass and limited stage depth reduce warmth and versatility.
Youtube Video Summary

Build mirrors other ZiiGaat releases: attractive shells but a slightly thick nozzle and average comfort, a non-modular stock cable, and the same case seen on cheaper models. At this price, the accessories would benefit from an update.

The Arcanis (2DD isobaric + 5BA, ~$399) is a cleaner, more engaging take on Lush, with small lifts through the upper mids and treble for a neutral-bright balance. It is tuned to preserve air and even sub-bass audibility at lower volume, yielding forward vocals, very extended upper treble, and a crisp, technical presentation.

Bass sits just under neutral—tidy rather than weighty—keeping mids clean and slightly forward, while treble is airy and extended. Stage has good width and height but modest depth; detail retrieval is strong. Best for listeners prioritizing clarity and resolution over warmth; a focused, low-volume performer rather than an all-rounder.

Bass: B+ Mids: A Treble: A+ Soundstage: A- Details: S-

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech

The AFUL Performer 5+2 (also listed as “Performer 7”) uses a 2DD+4BA+1 micro planar driver array and AFUL’s LC-network crossover plus a 3D-printed acoustic tube system, aiming for clean band splits without smearing. The shell also integrates a high-damping air-pressure balance system, a design AFUL has used across its line. Official listings put MSRP around $229 and outline the same core tech features.

Tonally it trends neutral with a sub-bass lift: bass has solid depth and texture, mids stay relatively linear, and the presence/treble region adds energy without veering into sharpness on most chains. Multiple reviews characterize it as warm-neutral with bass boost or slightly V-shaped depending on perspective, which matches listening notes about a lively but controlled upper end. Sensitivity and load are portable-friendly (≈109 dB, 15 Ω), so it reaches performance without demanding amplification.

Technicalities are competitive for the class: imaging is tidy with good instrument separation, micro-detail retrieval is above average, and soundstage is moderate (more width than depth). Build and comfort are typical resin-shell fare; some users note occasional lower-treble bite depending on tips and recordings, so treble-sensitive listeners may wish to pair accordingly. Overall value is strong at its price, especially if a clean, bass-supported neutral curve is the priority.


Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
S Tech

The Ziigaat Arcanis offers a bright-neutral sound profile, leaning heavily on technical prowess over bass impact. Its dual dynamic drivers in an isobaric configuration deliver tight, textured sub-bass rumble but lack mid-bass slam, making them better suited for analytical listening than bass-heavy genres. Vocals and midrange instruments shine with exceptional clarity and natural timbre, though an upper-mid lift can induce fatigue on sibilant tracks or at higher volumes.

Technical performance is the Arcanis’ standout trait, with pinpoint imaging and a holographic soundstage that excels in gaming and complex orchestral pieces. However, its treble polarizes listeners: some praise its airy extension, while others find it harsh with metallic tinge. Comfort is excellent for long sessions, but driver flex during fit adjustments and sparse accessories (basic cable, minimal tips) undermine its $399 positioning.


Aful Performer 5+2 (more reviews)

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Audio-In Reviews

Audio-In Reviews 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
AFUL Performer 5+2 delivers a punchy, engaging tuning with strong technical performance in a crowded 200 to 300 dollar bracket. A very competitive option that only trails top peers slightly in treble timbre naturalness. Engaging, dynamic tuning with visceral bass, airy extended treble and class leading technical performance for its price bracket. Treble timbre is a bit less natural than the very best competitors and the extra upper treble and lower treble energy may be too lively for more treble sensitive listeners.
Youtube Video Summary

The AFUL Performer 5+2 continues AFUL's streak of strong releases in the mid tier, bringing a tribrid driver setup into the very competitive 200 to 300 dollar range. The shell is well finished, slightly larger than the original Performer 5 but still very comfortable, with careful contouring that avoids hot spots in daily use. Build quality feels solid, the faceplate design is arguably AFUL's best yet, and the soft, easy to manage cable complements the overall aesthetics very nicely.

Sonically the set sits between neutral and mild V-shaped, with a boosted bass and a bit of extra treble energy while the mids stay slightly relaxed. Bass quantity is north of neutral, focused below roughly 200 to 300 hertz with good extension, giving a punchy, dynamic and physical low end that provides a visceral sub bass experience without noticeable bleed into the mids. A touch of extra low mids adds warmth, note weight and richness to male vocals while the midrange remains clean, detailed and natural, without odd peaks or dips. Treble carries some of the delicate character expected from a micro planar driver, with forward lower treble that adds bite and energy, plenty of upper treble extension, shimmer and air, staying engaging without becoming harsh or fatiguing; only a slightly less natural cymbal timbre versus sets like Da Vinci, Dino Quattro and Butterfly 61T stands out as a minor nitpick.

Technical performance is very strong for the price, at least on par with the Butterfly 61T, previously a reference for technicalities around 200 dollars, and the Performer 5+2 may even edge it out in soundstage and imaging, which come across as slightly above average versus other in ear monitors in this range. Within the 200 to 250 dollar bracket it can reasonably be considered one of the best technical performers available, while still offering an engaging, airy and exciting tuning that many listeners could daily drive. Those who prefer a smoother, more relaxed upper mid and treble presentation might still lean toward the Butterfly 61T, but the Performer 5+2 earns a very strong recommendation for anyone wanting a more lively, high performing tribrid that competes confidently among the top options in this segment.

Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Audio-In Reviews original ranking

Audio-In Reviews Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7.8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
Rating: A+ | Value: ⭐⭐⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 9 very nice neutral sound recessed female vocals

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A- Tech
A detailed, engaging all-rounder that's exciting without being shouty or harsh. Smooth, neutral tuning with a bass boost, excellent bass quality, clean mids, forward vocals, and sparkly, incisive treble. Great detail. I wouldn’t change a thing.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Aful Performer 5+2 reviewed by Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A+ Tech
check links for more info:

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

Ziigaat Arcanis (more reviews)

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 7* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Scores lower in Apex B+
Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Arcanis and Lush IEMs offer distinct flavors at their price points, both featuring resin builds with eye-catching faceplates—sparkly green for the Arcanis and silver-black for the Lush. Fit is familiar to other Ziigaat models, and accessories include a basic cable, ear tips, and carrying pouch. Sonically, the Arcanis delivers a holographic, punchy presentation with emphasized sub-bass and upper mids, making footsteps, slides, and distant gunfire pop with urgency. The Lush leans darker and smoother, relaxing upper mids to tame gunfire harshness while maintaining clean bass and excellent separation.

For gaming, performance varies by title. In Valorant and CS2, the Lush shines with precise imaging and a smoother, fatigue-free experience—gunfire feels controlled without sacrificing detail. The Arcanis excels in COD, where its aggressive tuning highlights critical cues like footsteps and slides with greater potency. However, in Apex Legends, the Lush’s relaxed profile struggles with subtle audio cues (e.g., light taps or shield cells), earning a B rating. The Arcanis fares better (B+) with superior depth reads and emphasis on environmental sounds, though complex fights can overwhelm its separation compared to top-tier sets like the Mangird Tea Pro.

Ultimately, the Arcanis is a versatile all-rounder, slightly favored for both music and most gaming scenarios. The Lush carves a niche for smooth, non-fatiguing sessions in Valorant/CS2, filling a unique spot in Ziigaat’s lineup. Both IEMs offer exceptional resolution and layering for their prices, but the choice hinges on preference: the Arcanis for its energetic clarity, or the Lush for its refined, relaxed signature.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

Ziigaat Arcanis reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized
One community member has rated the Ziigaat Arcanis at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Aful Performer 5+2 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Ziigaat Arcanis User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

8.5

Excellent

Aful Performer 5+2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.5

Gaming Grade

A

Ziigaat Arcanis Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

8.5

Gaming Grade

S-

Aful Performer 5+2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning feels well executed, keeping a natural flow across the spectrum. Switching genres feels seamless.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Overall technical control is strong, presenting instruments with clarity and sensible staging. Textures are portrayed with satisfying clarity.
Bass A
Expect a commanding bass response that reaches deep without clouding the mix. There's both slam and nuance in equal measure.
Mids A
Expect lifelike vocals and instruments with impressive nuance and realism. You can easily follow harmonies and backups.
Treble A-
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics A-
It delivers crisp, authoritative dynamics that keep music thrilling. Subtle level shifts are clearly conveyed.
Soundstage A-
Immersion steps up dramatically as width, depth, and height integrate into a cohesive hologram. Everything sounds naturally spaced.
Details A-
Low-level information blossoms, presenting a rich tapestry of articulate sound. Analytical listeners will be delighted.
Imaging A-
Spatial cues respond immediately, reflecting every movement in the mix. Spatial cues respond instantly to the mix.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion.

Ziigaat Arcanis Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • The tuning feels expertly organized, marrying agile dynamics with well-defined spatial cues. Technical listeners will appreciate the poise.
Bass B+
Expect a solid thump that keeps the rhythm engaging yet controlled. Sub-bass presence is supportive, not overwhelming.
Mids A
It delivers an excellent midrange that feels vibrant and true to life. It balances clarity with natural smoothness.
Treble A
It provides outstanding treble finesse, balancing brightness and control gracefully. It's engaging yet remarkably controlled.
Dynamics A-
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A-
The stage stretches in every direction, carving out clear three-dimensional pockets for each player. Placement accuracy impresses from the start.
Details S-
Inner textures glow vividly yet never feel etched or artificial. It borders on studio-monitor transparency.
Gaming S-
Expansive soundstage with accurate directional cues. Handles complex audio landscapes while preserving important gameplay information. Good value for serious gaming performance.

Aful Performer 5+2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Ziigaat Arcanis User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
V Vairen
8.5

A refined smooth-neutral IEM offering exceptional vocal transparency and fatigue-free listening, though let down by underwhelming accessories

Tuning: S Tech: S- Bass: S- Mids: S Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: S-
Pros
Natural midrange with excellent vocal clarity, smooth non-fatiguing treble extension, and tight technical bass with good texture
Cons
Subpar accessories including basic cable and minimal ear tips, noticeable driver flex when adjusting fit, lacks balanced cable option

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer