Campfire Moon Rover VS 64 Audio Solo

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Campfire Moon Rover and 64 Audio Solo are in-ear monitors. Campfire Moon Rover costs $1,199 while 64 Audio Solo costs $1,400. 64 Audio Solo is $201 more expensive. Campfire Moon Rover holds a decisive 2.1-point edge in reviewer scores (8.8 vs 6.6). Campfire Moon Rover has significantly better mids with a 3-point edge, Campfire Moon Rover has significantly better treble with a 1.5-point edge and Campfire Moon Rover has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Campfire Moon Rover 64 Audio Solo
Bass 8.8 6
Mids 9 6
Treble 7 5.5
Details 8.8 7
Soundstage 7 7
Imaging 8.8 7
Dynamics 7 6
Tonality 7.5 5.9
Technicalities 7 5.5

Campfire Moon Rover Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

8.8

Excellent


64 Audio Solo Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Jaytiss
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

6.6

Cautiously Favorable


Campfire Moon Rover User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Solo User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Campfire Moon Rover Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.2

Gaming Grade

B

64 Audio Solo Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.6

Gaming Grade

C

Campfire Moon Rover Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Mids S
Reference-class midrange - perfectly balanced and hyper-detailed. Utterly natural reproduction with effortless texture and layering.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics A-
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Solo Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B-
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation - wide, deep and tall. Precise instrument placement with clear separation in all dimensions.
Details A-
Excellent detail retrieval: highly resolving without being clinical. Effortlessly reveals micro-details and textural subtleties.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Campfire Moon Rover Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score normalized
Not cheap and you can get stuff which sounds better for less to be honest. I like the build quality and form factor. Sound-wise not for everybody, but for me.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 8.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
It's a littled relaxed in the bass, but has a fun nice tune.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: S Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A-

64 Audio Solo Reviews

Reviewed by: Super* Review

Super* Review 7* * score normalized
This Planar lines up with the 64 Audio house sound. There are better options for Planars and this sound signature.

Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 6.9 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
Warm and shimmery with excellent imaging. Dampening in the mid-treble elevates this above the standard planar IEM experience.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Details: A- Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
It's nice, but is planar and kinda dull.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Campfire Moon Rover User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio Solo User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer