Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 VS Tin Hifi C3

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 and Tin Hifi C3 are in-ear monitors. Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 costs $60 while Tin Hifi C3 costs $50. Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 is $10 more expensive. Tin Hifi C3 holds a decisive 2-point edge in reviewer scores (4.5 vs 6.5).

Insights

Metric Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Tin Hifi C3
Mids 5 6.5
Treble 4 6.5
Soundstage 6 6.5
Dynamics 1 6.5
Tonality 4.5 6.5
Technicalities 4 6.5
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 and Tin Hifi C3 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable


Tin Hifi C3 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Cautiously Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 (more reviews)

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Solid iem for those who enjoy a light bass shelf.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: B

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tin Hifi C3 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

Tin Hifi C3 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.5

Gaming Grade

B+

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Tin Hifi C3 Scorings

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tin Hifi C3 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer