Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 - Reviews & Ratings

1 Review (C Tier | 4.5/10)

Home Celestee Pandomonon 2.0

Summary

Based on 1 review, the Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 is a situational pick according to reviewers, who suggest matching it carefully to individual tastes.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

Reviews

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Solid iem for those who enjoy a light bass shelf.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: B

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Infos

Discuss Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.8
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. KZ AM16
KZ AM16 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.8
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Sivga M300
Sivga M300 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.6
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Tin Hifi C3 MK2
Tin Hifi C3 MK2 offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.6
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro
Rose Technics Star City 5 Pro offers better dynamics and treble.
6.5
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.5
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
6.5
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. ROSESELSA QuietSea II
ROSESELSA QuietSea II offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6.5
Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics.
6.4
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer