Crinear Daybreak VS Juzear Harrier

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Crinear Daybreak and Juzear Harrier use 1DD+2BA+2mPT and 1DD+6BA+2Planar driver setups respectively. Crinear Daybreak costs $170 while Juzear Harrier costs $330. Juzear Harrier is $160 more expensive. Juzear Harrier holds a clear 0.6-point edge in reviewer scores (7.3 vs 8). Crinear Daybreak carries a user score of 7.4. Juzear Harrier has better bass with a 0.6-point edge, Juzear Harrier has better mids with a 0.8-point edge, Juzear Harrier has significantly better treble with a 1.4-point edge, Juzear Harrier has better dynamics with a 0.5-point edge, Juzear Harrier has better soundstage with a 0.7-point edge, Juzear Harrier has slightly better details with a 0.4-point edge and Juzear Harrier has slightly better imaging with a 0.4-point edge.

Insights

Metric Crinear Daybreak Juzear Harrier
Bass 7.6 8.2
Mids 7.4 8.2
Treble 6.6 8
Details 7.7 8.1
Soundstage 7 7.7
Imaging 7.7 8.1
Dynamics 7.4 7.9
Tonality 7.5 8.4
Technicalities 6.9 8.1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Harrier reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Crinear Daybreak Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.3

Generally Favorable


Juzear Harrier Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8

Strongly Favorable


Reviews Comparison

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech

The CrinEar Daybreak is a tri-brid IEM built around a 5-driver array—1DD + 2BA + 2 micro-planar tweeters—with a moderate 20 Ω load and 105 dB/mW sensitivity, making it easy to drive from portable sources. MSRP sits at $169.99, placing it squarely in the competitive mid-budget segment. These core specs are confirmed on the official product page and retail listings.

Tonally, Daybreak trends toward neutral with a mild sub-bass lift and restrained warmth, but listener experience can swing with tip choice. Multiple independent impressions note a touch of upper-mid / lower-treble energy (ear-gain region) on stock narrow-bore tips, which relaxes with wide-bore options; overall midrange balance and resolution are strong for the price. These observations are echoed in in-depth evaluations and measurements from Headphones.com’s reviews.

Build is a resin shell with metal faceplate and a compact pseudo-custom profile; comfort is generally good, though the 6 mm nozzle and angle may not be ideal for every ear. Accessory quality is serviceable—SPC cable with interchangeable 3.5 mm / 4.4 mm terminations, a leatherette case, and basic tips—leaving room for aftermarket tip rolling to fine-tune treble behavior and staging. These physical details and inclusions are documented by the maker and retailers.


Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: A- Dynamics: A Soundstage: A- Details: A+ Imaging: A
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Crinear Daybreak or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $169.99

Buy Crinear Daybreak on Linsoul

Juzear Harrier reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.8 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech

The Juzear Harrier is a nine-driver tribrid IEM using a 1DD+6BA+2 micro planar configuration per side, positioned as an “accessibly priced flagship” at about $329.99 in the mid-to-upper price bracket. Developed under the Tuned with Squiglink program, its frequency response is targeted around a refined IEF neutral curve with added bass boost, aiming for a natural overall tonality with extra low-end weight rather than a classic V-shape.

On the tuning side, the 4th-generation carbon-composite dynamic driver is specified to provide a punchy but controlled bass with sub-bass emphasis, while midrange duties fall to four custom BAs that are described as keeping vocals and instruments rich without excessive coloration. Two Knowles BAs and the dual micro planar drivers handle upper mids and treble, targeting clean extension and detail while keeping the top end relatively smooth, consistent with an IEF neutral + bass boost profile that avoids sharp peaks. In practice this kind of tuning should yield a slightly warm, full low end, neutral-leaning mids, and treble that prioritizes smoothness and usability over extreme brightness or analytical sharpness.

From a technical standpoint, the Harrier’s four-way crossover and four independent acoustic tubes are engineered to minimize driver interaction and maintain low distortion, with manufacturer data and early reports emphasizing clean imaging and good separation rather than extreme stage width. High-precision 3D-printed shells and Blue Tiger’s Eye faceplates contribute to comfort and build quality, but they also push expectations for performance at this price—so under strict value-for-money criteria, Harrier reads as a well-rounded, technically capable mid-tier tribrid that competes strongly around $300–350 without challenging the very best in higher price brackets. This justifies a high-7s overall score: strong tuning and technicalities for its bracket, but not at the level that would warrant “flagship-of-flagships” numbers reserved for substantially more expensive IEMs.


Bass: A+ Mids: A Treble: A Dynamics: A Soundstage: A Details: A Imaging: A+
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Juzear Harrier or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $299

Buy Juzear Harrier on HiFiGO

Crinear Daybreak (more reviews)

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 8* * score rescaled + normalized
Spot-on tonality. Everything sounds very natural and not contrasty. Vocal texturing is above average. Low-contrast sound signature. Bass is not that tight.
Youtube Video Summary

The CrinEar Daybreak lands at $170 as the second IEM from Crinacle, positioned as a more accessible follow-up to the limited-edition Meta. This tribrid features a single dynamic driver, two balanced armatures, and two micro planars handling the highs. The build includes compact, semi-custom dark smoky resin shells offering good stability and comfort, though the molding might be slightly aggressive for some. The included cable provides swappable terminations (3.5mm and 4.4mm) but is noted for being somewhat stiff and kink-prone. Accessories are solid for the price, including a leatherette case and multiple tip options, with the stock silicones recommended for optimal fit due to the slightly longer nozzle.

Sonically, the Daybreak delivers what the review calls the best tonal balance yet within the popular "new meta" tuning category. Its frequency response is described as exceptionally neutral and natural from the mid-bass upwards, creating a low-contrast, chill, and non-fatiguing listen with forward, textured vocals and non-existent sibilance. However, this comes with trade-offs: the bass lacks ultimate tightness and slam, and the treble exhibits a light, wispy quality (likened to cotton candy) that lacks some bite and definition. While technical performance like imaging is solid, it doesn't stand out as exceptional.

In direct comparisons with six competitors around $200 (including the Meta, Binary x Chopin, EPZ P50, Ziigaat Lush, Truthear Pure, and Kiwi Ears KE4), the Daybreak consistently ranked highest for tonality. It was praised as a modern benchmark for natural tuning at its price. However, it fell behind in bass physicality and treble incisiveness. Ultimately rated a strong four stars, the Daybreak is highlighted as an excellent choice for those prioritizing a refined, natural midrange and easy listening experience over sheer technical prowess or visceral impact, earning the label of a "modern-day Etymotic ER2XR" with far better comfort.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 8 Reviewer Score
Slightly V-Shaped take on the JM-1 Meta. Some may find it a bit intense - especially in the upper treble, and perhaps the upper mids - it can sometimes border on being a tad shouty. Clean sounding throughout with great mids. Good contrasty sound. Mostly neutral sound signature. Thank you Crin, for making this non-limited vs. the Crinear Meta. I thoroughly enjoy this much more than the limited release.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Paul Wasabii

Paul Wasabii 7.6 * Score computed by IEMRanking.com
A Tuning
A- Tech
End-to-end balanced hybrid that needs some volume; bass hits clean and treble extends without harshness, but vocals are less forward. Strong EDM performance with better layering and imaging than the prior Meta when played louder. EDM-friendly balance with clean impact, non-harsh treble extension, and solid layering at higher volume. Needs higher volume to open up and the 2–5 kHz region can feel a touch energetic for vocal-first listeners.
Youtube Video Summary

CrinEar DayBreak presents a balanced end-to-end tuning that shifts with power. At low volume it can read warm and soft, but when driven a bit harder the bass and treble rise to meet the mids, revealing clean impact, clear treble extension from the BA + microplaner stack, and a more open presentation. Vocals carry natural body from a lower-mid bump without being pushed unnaturally forward, so the overall character leans more versatile than strictly vocal-centric.

Versus Meta, DayBreak fixes the bass shelf and stretches upper energy for easier air, trading some midrange push for better layering and imaging. Compared with Odyssey, high-volume listening yields more space and separation; against vocal sets like Cadenza 4 or Zero Red, DayBreak gives up a bit of mid focus but wins on genre range, especially EDM. Not a sub-bass monster, yet the bass hits harder than the graph suggests, with cleaner texture and a healthier sub-to-mid-bass ratio. The only nit is a slightly energetic 2–5 kHz zone that some will prefer a dB lower.

Call it an unintentional banger: the treble is sloped enough to avoid glare while keeping drops vivid, letting big builds explode without turning sharp. For listeners who play a notch louder and want balanced energy at both ends with mids that stay natural, DayBreak delivers a satisfying hybrid package for the price.

Bass: A Mids: A- Treble: A Dynamics: A Soundstage: A- Details: A- Imaging: A

Paul Wasabii original ranking

Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Lacks silky treble, but it's fine. But fine isn't good enough.
Youtube Video Summary

The CrinEar Daybreak features a metal nozzle and metal faceplate with comfortable contours, though the fit is noted as a bit dainty and small. Isolation is practically non-existent, and the fit isn't particularly secure. The included cable looks nice and photographs well, featuring interchangeable terminations for versatility, but its chin slider moves too easily and isn't recommended for those needing a functional one. The case is deemed aesthetically pleasing and feels good, though not especially premium, magnetically shutting with adequate space.

Sonically, the Daybreak leans boring and somewhat sterile or dry. It offers nice bass and a lot of upper mids, which are done decently with a standard 3K peak. However, the combination of this upper-mid focus and an incisive peak around 8K contributes to a perceived harshness and sharpness, lacking in overall detail retrieval. Graph comparisons reveal its signature has significantly more upper mids and often more bass than competitors like the Moondrop Dusk or TruthEar Nova, resulting in a less engaging listen. Sets like the Defiant, Chopin, and Performer 7 are cited as more engaging alternatives at similar or lower prices, with the Defiant specifically recommended over the Daybreak. Even the Punch Audio martillo and Moondrop Meteor, sharing driver configurations, are considered more fun or better tuned.

Ultimately, the Daybreak is a solid A-minus IEM, well-packaged and a commendable first effort for the brand, but it's not hypeworthy or a benchmark. It lacks imagination and falls short against numerous compelling alternatives around its price point, such as the Performer 7, ZOS Defiant, Chopin, or discounted planar options like the Aether. While a good value, especially if found on sale via Linsoul or the used market, its piercing upper mids and failure to truly excel make it hard to fully recommend over the competition.

Mids: A- Treble: C+ Dynamics: A- Soundstage: B+

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Fox Told Me So

Fox Told Me So 7.2 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
What could you expect from JM-1?
This is it.

Crinear Daybreak's tuning follows the New Meta family with two quirks: a dip at 400 Hz that slightly thins male vocals, and a dip around 8 kHz that smooths treble but softens cymbals/overtones. Otherwise it’s safe, balanced, and within preference bounds.

Bass has moderate body with audible rumble and quick decay, though slam could hit harder; Mids sit neutral, neither pushed nor recessed, keeping instruments evenly balanced; Treble rolls off smoothly—pleasant, but lacks the final lift that would open it up. Resolution is average for the price: clear layers but compressed depth, like a lasagna being pressed flat.

Within the $169 bracket, Daybreak is neutral, natural, and non-fatiguing—an easy daily driver.

Fox Told Me So original ranking

Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A Tech
Here we go again. Very similar tuning as P50 and SL224. Less vocal centric vs P50s, but more bassy and all-rounded. Slightly slightly less technical than SL224.
Youtube Video Summary

The CrinEar Daybreak offers a balanced, clean, and non-fatiguing sound signature, functioning effectively as an all-rounder. Every frequency region is solid, delivering a smooth presentation without harshness or overwhelming warmth. The bass provides a slight sub-bass rumble and integrates cleanly into the mids, avoiding bleed, though it lacks significant impact, slam, or deep texture. Similarly, the mid-range and vocals are well-separated and forward enough, free from congestion or odd timbre, but don't specialize. The treble has enough extension and air, avoiding darkness or excessive sharpness, but misses out on micro-detail, sparkle, and expansive staging. It’s a decent, inoffensive performer across the board, described aptly as a "very good vanilla ice cream cone".

Technically, the Daybreak is competitive but not class-leading. Sets like the Meta, Ziigaat Crescent, Kiwi Ears Astral, Simgot EM6L, or TruthEar Nova offer slightly better detail retrieval, imaging, and resolution. Its main challenge comes from remarkably similar competitors, particularly the EPZ P50 and SLIIVO SL224, which share nearly identical tuning, driver configurations, and technical performance around the same $160-$180 price point. The P50 leans slightly more vocal-centric, while the SL224 offers marginally better bass texture and treble detail (though costing more). If you already own either, the Daybreak becomes largely redundant. Against alternatives like the bassier, more dynamic Ziigaat Odyssey ($200), the Daybreak feels safer but less engaging at higher volumes. Compared to Harman-tuned sets like the Supermix 4, Chopin, or Nova, the Daybreak boasts fuller tonality and less fatigue but gives up some layering and detail.

Ultimately, the Daybreak is a competent, well-packaged all-rounder at $170, delivering a balanced and inoffensive listen suitable for any genre library. However, it fails to stand out uniquely in a crowded field. Its sound signature is replicated almost exactly by the existing P50 and SL224. While it earns a half recommendation as a solid option for those seeking a non-fatiguing all-rounder who *don't* own those twins, it's unlikely to become a favorite due to its lack of distinctive character. Value is decent, but alternatives offer more specialization or technical prowess for similar or lower cost.


Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 6 * score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary

The Crinacle Daybreak is a technically excellent IEM that offers exceptional clarity and detail retrieval without being fatiguing. Its five-driver configuration delivers a cohesive and precise sound signature that is clean, flat, and incredibly balanced. The bass is present and punchy but never exaggerated, making it a perfect tool for studying music and hearing every nuance in a recording.

However, this precision comes at the cost of fun. The tuning is described as a little dry and somewhat intimate, lacking the expansive soundstage and flavorful character that makes other IEMs more engaging for pure enjoyment. While the build is solid with an acceptable cable and nice connectors, its looks are admittedly boring. It’s a perfectly cooked meal that follows the recipe without any surprises.

Ultimately, the Daybreak is a highly respected and much-loved IEM that fills a specific niche for a clean, reference-like sound. It’s a business suit of an IEM, but it wouldn't be the first choice for someone looking for a more exciting, fun, or "f***ed up" sound signature to get them moving. It commands respect for its technical merits, even if it isn't to everyone's personal taste.


Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel

Juzear Harrier (more reviews)

Juzear Harrier reviewed by Audio-In Reviews

Audio-In Reviews 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Balanced neutral-with-sub-bass-boost tuning with natural vocals, smooth yet detailed treble and strong technical performance that competes with the best sets around $300. Outstanding neutral-with-bass-boost tuning, excellent comfort and build, and technical performance that rivals higher-priced IEMs. Upper mids and vocals can sit a bit more forward than some may prefer, with less mid-bass slam than warmer competitors.
Youtube Video Summary

The Juzear Harrier is a $329 collaboration between Juzear and Mark Ryan that aims less at chasing a specific target and more at delivering a balanced all-rounder in the $300 segment. Build and accessories feel distinctly premium, with a 3D-printed semi-custom shell, genuine blue tiger's eye faceplate, modular cable with 3.5 and 4.4 terminations, and a practical semi-hard case that ties the whole aesthetic together. Comfort is excellent thanks to the light shells, secure fit and solid tip selection, leaving little to complain about in daily use.

Sonically, the Harrier follows an F-neutral foundation with a moderate bass boost, coming across as essentially neutral with extra low-end support. Bass emphasis is focused in the sub-bass, providing satisfying rumble and dynamics while keeping mid-bass in check to avoid bleed and maintain a very clean midrange. Vocals and instruments through the mids sound natural and slightly forward, with just enough warmth and weight to keep things engaging, while the treble brings good detail and air yet stays smooth, never crossing into sharpness or harshness.

Technical performance is a major strength: detail retrieval is among the best at this price, the soundstage offers above-average width with convincing depth and layering, and imaging and focus lock vocals and instruments firmly in place. In direct comparisons, the Harrier offers cleaner bass and lower mids than many peers, a more balanced tonality than bassier sets like Da Vinci, and a smoother, fuller presentation than brighter options or leaner, more vocal-forward tunings such as Dunu 242. Overall, it sits right alongside standouts like Volume S as one of the most compelling, broadly appealing IEMs in its price bracket, with a tuning and technical package that will suit a wide audience.

Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Audio-In Reviews original ranking

Audio-In Reviews Youtube Channel

Juzear Harrier reviewed by Gizaudio Axel

Gizaudio Axel 8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A+ Tech
Balanced, natural tri-brid with controlled sub-bass and smooth, airy treble. Great all-rounder with comfortable fit and quality modular cable. Cohesive, balanced tuning with natural mids, controlled sub-bass and smooth, airy treble. Moderate bass quantity and tamer treble mean it does not suit bassheads or bright-leaning listeners.
Youtube Video Summary

Juzear Harrier is a tribrid (1DD + 6BA + 2 micro-planars) tuned with Squiglink, packaged with a soft modular cable (3.5/4.4), 11 pairs of tips, and a compact leatherette case. Build is smooth and well finished with average-sized shells and a secure, pressure-free fit. The kit feels cohesive and practical rather than flashy.

Tonally it aims for a neutral mid-range with a sub-bass focus and a smooth, airy treble, staying balanced, natural and engaging without harshness. Bass is tight and textured with satisfying rumble yet moderate in level; vocals are lifelike and never shouty; clarity and extension up top remain fatigue-free across genres. Technical performance is great for the class with good detail and cohesion, positioning the Harrier as a versatile all-rounder—but it does not suit bassheads or fans of very bright tunings.

Bass: A+ Mids: S- Treble: A+ Details: A+

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel

Crinear Daybreak User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score:

Based on 1 user reviews

7.4

Generally Favorable

Juzear Harrier User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Crinear Daybreak Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.1

Gaming Grade

A-

Juzear Harrier Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.9

Gaming Grade

A

Crinear Daybreak Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass A
Expect a commanding bass response that reaches deep without clouding the mix. There's both slam and nuance in equal measure.
Mids A-
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble B+
Treble is articulate and clean, adding excitement without harshness. It adds sparkle without harshness.
Dynamics A-
It delivers crisp, authoritative dynamics that keep music thrilling. Subtle level shifts are clearly conveyed.
Soundstage A-
Immersion steps up dramatically as width, depth, and height integrate into a cohesive hologram. Everything sounds naturally spaced.
Details A
Low-level information blossoms, presenting a rich tapestry of articulate sound. Analytical listeners will be delighted.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging delivers precise, stable placement with instruments occupying tangible points in space. It locks each element into a steady position.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations.

Juzear Harrier Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A+
  • You hear a mature integration of lows, mids, and highs that keeps music lifelike. Small tuning tweaks showcase expert restraint.

Average Technical Grade

A+
  • You get an articulate, polished performance with immersive stage depth and great control. There's a sense of polish across the whole spectrum.
Bass A+
Expect a gripping low-end presence that marries clarity with visceral impact. Dynamic swings land with thrilling force.
Mids A+
You get reference-worthy mids that combine transparency, texture, and depth. It brings out emotional nuance beautifully.
Treble A+
It delivers superb treble brilliance that stays pure even in complex passages. It adds excitement while staying pure.
Dynamics A
You get outstanding dynamic agility, from subtle nuances to big hits. Impact comes with quick recovery.
Soundstage A
All dimensions bloom together, producing an expansive venue that feels carefully rendered. You can map the ensemble easily.
Details A+
Complex productions unravel completely, letting you examine every thread. Textures are rendered with exquisite finesse.
Imaging A+
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Crinear Daybreak User Reviews

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review
S Strix
7.4

A well-toned, easy-listening IEM that excels at midrange clarity even if it doesn’t dazzle technically.

Tuning: A+ Tech: A- Bass: B+ Mids: S- Treble: A- Dynamics: A+ Soundstage: A Details: A- Imaging: A-
Pros
Balanced and non-fatiguing tuning with smooth, natural mids.
Cons
Bass lacks slam and treble can feel veiled or lacking crisp sparkle.

Juzear Harrier User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer