Dita Project M VS Yanyin Canon Pro

Youtube Video Summary

Yanyin Canon Pro is a 1DD + 6BA hybrid around $400 with a light, well-sized shell that’s easy to fit and pleasantly vented. The kit impresses: a suede-like round case feels durable, the tip selection is reasonable, and the cable is a standout—supple, visually premium, and available in 3.5 / 4.4 (even 2.5 for holdouts). Comfort trends above average, and the dip switches exist but the favored setting is the “all up” configuration.

Tonally the Canon Pro skews neutral and safe: modest bass with slightly recessed lower mids, a clean midrange, and smooth treble that brings out micro-detail without harsh spikes. Sub-bass could dig deeper, yet dynamics never feel anemic; it’s more about balance than fireworks. The FR “hugs the target,” with a touch of upper air and extension that reads subtle rather than showy, yielding an all-day listen with natural imaging and very low fatigue.

Against peers, Canon Pro beats Canon 2 for detail and top-end finesse (Canon 2 offers more warmth and punch), and comes across more refined than Hype 4, whose upper air can feel exaggerated. Versus Moondrop x Crinacle Dusk, the Dusk DSP wins if DSP is on the table, but in pure analog the edge tilts to Canon Pro. Sets like AFUL Performer 7 trade blows (more bass/treble “spice” there), while Pilgrim can read too bright and Moondrop Meteor feels leaner down low. The takeaway: not a showboat, but a polished, versatile IEM with beautiful accessories, easy comfort, and tuning that’s EQ-friendly and broadly appealing—an easy recommendation for those who value clarity and poise over spectacle.

Youtube Video Summary

Yanyin Canon Pro brings a 1DD + 6BA stack with two DIP switches that alter an internal crossover rather than simple EQ, but the documentation is maddeningly vague. Stock out of the box (switch 1 up, switch 2 down) hits the sweet spot: most bass, gently damped treble, and a cohesive, engaging sound. Flip both down and the presentation turns flat and distant; flip both up and treble gets piercing with bass falling behind; 1 down / 2 up is another treble burst. Imaging remains solid throughout, but these are not bass monsters even with bass engaged. Tip rolling matters: wide-bore “velvet” tips step the listener back a row, smoothing the intensity and making the set feel properly $400-grade.

Build and accessories are a mixed bag. The cable is excellent—thick, straight, aluminum hardware that would make full-size headphones jealous—though the included plug here was fixed 3.5 mm (a 4.4 mm option is preferable). The carry case and presentation are great, but the shells themselves look muted and underwhelming in person, a far cry from attention-grabbing faceplates. Comfort and fit are fine, with flared nozzles and grippy bases that keep tips secure.

Sonically, with the right tips and the 1 up / 2 down setting, Canon Pro can absolutely be a daily driver—balanced, clean, and listenable for long stretches. The headache is the switching: three of the four permutations feel like downgrades, and the lack of a clear switch map from Yanyin doesn’t help. Net take: tuning potential is there, but it requires fussing (tips, gain, switches) to get it right. As a package—case, cable, and sound once dialed—this feels more like a strong $300 proposition; sort the switch profiles so each one is genuinely good, and the full $400 ask would make a lot more sense.

Youtube Video Summary

Yanyin Canon Pro comes with two dip switches per side and effectively three tunings (up/up, down/down, and mixed). Packaging is solid with a nicer copper cable, tips, case, and a switch tool. Sonically it shifts away from Canon 2’s warmth into a more neutral profile with clean bass, quick attack/decay, and a wide, deep stage. Detail retrieval, separation, and layering are a highlight for music at around $400, competing with sets like Mangird Tea Pro and Canon 2, while feeling less intimate than both.

For gaming, the expansive stage delivers strong imaging and “yardage” cues, with gunfire rendered clean and impactful; however, reduced mid-bass body means footsteps don’t cut through as urgently as on Canon 2. In Valorant (preferred up/up), the set sounds spacious and resolving but can soften the immediacy of close-range steps—still solid due to depth and layering, scoring about a B+. In Apex, down/down becomes preferable: slides and lighter cues pop better amid chaotic fights, yet overall brightness and big explosions can mask details, putting it around B+ (bordering B). In Call of Duty, imaging and layering impress, but the softer footstep emphasis keeps it near a B+. Overall, a B+ for competitive play: choose Canon Pro for a more neutral, airy presentation and excellent detail; pick Canon 2 or Mangird Tea Pro when maximal footstep emphasis and tighter intimacy are the priority.

Youtube Video Summary

The Ziigaat Arcanis offers a warm, somewhat thick sound signature with a noticeable bass boost and a lean lower midrange. This is balanced by a relaxed upper midrange and lower treble, contributing to its overall smooth character. While it provides decent extension, the Arcanis can occasionally present vocals with a slightly wet or near-sibilant edge, especially depending on ear tip choice and fit depth. Its transient response is sharper than the Yanyin Canon Pro, giving it better definition and crisper imaging, though the bass physicality is only middling.

Physically, the Arcanis features lightweight plastic shells with a distinctive dark black and green aesthetic. However, the build quality feels somewhat cheap for the $400 price point, especially paired with the included thin, glossy cable. The shells are notably long, leading to a fit that can feel deep and occasionally aggressive in the ear canal, exacerbated by the stock ear tips. Users may experience noticeable driver flex or squish when inserting them. Comfort is generally acceptable for upright listening but becomes problematic when lying on your side.

Ultimately, the Arcanis earns a three-star rating. While it delivers a generally inoffensive, warm sound with decent technicalities like transient bite and imaging, it lacks standout qualities or strong definition at its price. The physical experience, particularly the fit and perceived build quality, further holds it back from being a compelling recommendation. It ends up feeling like a competent but unremarkable offering in its tier.