Fatfreq Maestro SE VS 64 Audio Volur

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Fatfreq Maestro SE and 64 Audio Volur use 1DD+7BA+4EST and 2DD+8BA driver setups respectively. Fatfreq Maestro SE costs $1,900 while 64 Audio Volur costs $2,499. 64 Audio Volur is $599 more expensive. 64 Audio Volur holds a clear 0.9-point edge in reviewer scores (7.5 vs 8.4). 64 Audio Volur has better bass with a 0.5-point edge, Fatfreq Maestro SE has better mids with a 0.5-point edge, Fatfreq Maestro SE has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge, 64 Audio Volur has significantly better details with a 2-point edge and 64 Audio Volur has significantly better imaging with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Fatfreq Maestro SE 64 Audio Volur
Bass 8 8.5
Mids 7 6.5
Treble 7.5 7.3
Details 6 8
Soundstage 7.5 7
Imaging 7 8
Dynamics 7.5 7.5
Tonality 7.9 7.5
Technicalities 7.5 7.8

Fatfreq Maestro SE Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.5

Strongly Favorable


64 Audio Volur Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

8.4

Very Positive


Reviews Comparison

Fatfreq Maestro SE reviewed by Yifang

Yifang 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Thunderously deep bass and decent technicalities around. Better than Grand Maestro from having less treble sharpness/sibilance. Very difficult to drive (more than STORM) and NEEDS power to make the bass reach it's potential. Tonally sounds bright despite talks all being about bass. Mids aren't the smoothest.

Yifang original ranking

Yifang Youtube Channel

Fatfreq Maestro SE reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.8 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the Fatfreq Maestro SE at an average of 3.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Generally Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

64 Audio Volur reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.8 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the 64 Audio Volr at an average of 4.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Exceptional.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Fatfreq Maestro SE (more reviews)

Fatfreq Maestro SE reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Thunderous bass. Proper midbass, brilliant trebs. 12 drivers Female Vocals can sound un natural in some instances

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

Fatfreq Maestro SE reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 6.7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Good bass with neutral mids and treble, but sub-par techs for its price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: A+ Mids: B Treble: A- Details: B Imaging: A-

Fatfreq Maestro SE reviewed by Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech

64 Audio Volur (more reviews)

64 Audio Volur reviewed by Fresh Reviews

Fresh Reviews 9* * The score of this reviewer influences only the Gaming Score
Great IEM but big price. Not Huge Gain
Youtube Video Summary

64 Audio’s Volür is described as a holographic, highly resolving IEM with unusually high bass quantity that still preserves separation, layering, and air between notes. In games, positional cues feel 3D with immaculate depth and verticality; footsteps are prominent without smearing the mix, and vocals remain transparent with accurate timbre. The upper range presents as clean and non-sibilant, though certain upper-mid effects (e.g., shield cells/light taps) could use a touch more presence. For music, the stage is wider with singers a bit farther out, and micro-details—breaths, mic proximity, subtle slurs—emerge easily, delivering a fun yet technical listen.

Hardware choices matter: the preferred module is the gray (then silver, gold, and lastly black, which can feel fatiguing). Tip rolling significantly alters the presentation; foam tips shift it the most, while alternatives like Snailfit/SpinFit change stage depth and comfort. The driver pack—dual dynamic drivers in a true isobaric low end, six BAs for mids, an extra BA up top, plus 64 Audio’s TIA—underpins the speed, texture, and punch that remain controlled even at elevated bass levels. The main gripe is the included 3.5 mm cable on a flagship at this price; a balanced 4.4 mm option in the box would better fit expectations.

Overall, Volür is framed as an S-tier “unicorn” for gaming and a top-shelf choice for music if a bass-boosted but impeccably separated signature is the goal. It’s expensive, but for those in this bracket, the combination of impact, imaging, and resolution makes it a compelling daily driver—powerfully engaging while staying precise across the range.


Fresh Reviews original ranking

Fresh Reviews Youtube Channel

64 Audio Volur reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 9* * score rescaled + normalized
If you are a lover of bass, this is a good option. Does not sacrify the rest of the sound signature
Youtube Video Summary

64 Audio’s Volür brings a bold, U-shaped tuning powered by a 10-driver array (8 BA + 2 DD in an isobaric setup) at a premium $2,500 price. The headline is the bass: a meaty, wallopy low end with unusually tight, textured attack that hits hard yet stays controlled, preserving clarity through the mids. Upper mids sit a touch relaxed, while an upper-treble zing adds bite, separation, and a roomy stage. 64 Audio’s APEX modules (M10/M12/M15/M20) primarily shift bass quantity; counterintuitively, the set shines most with the M20, where elevated bass balances the treble sparkle.

Build and ergonomics mirror recent 64 Audio releases: medium-sized shells with a slightly long nozzle (comfortable overall but fit stability can be just okay), plus a decent if slightly kinky stock cable. Technically, imaging, separation, and stage feel contrast-rich and more convincing than many peers. Tone preferences will matter: reduce the bass with lighter modules and the treble can dominate; leave the bass up and the presentation becomes satisfyingly muscular without smearing. As a proposition, Volür suits bass enthusiasts who want quantity and quality in tandem, earning a solid 4/5 for delivering big low-end thrills with high-end technical finesse.


Super* Review original ranking

Super* Review Youtube Channel

64 Audio Volur reviewed by Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.9 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Well-textured, satisfying bass. Vocal timbre is slightly off. Upper-treble peak can get a little hot. Cons: Unnatural vocal timbre.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: S- Mids: A- Treble: A Dynamics: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: A+

64 Audio Volur reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
A- Tech
64 Audio's finest.
Youtube Video Summary

64 Audio Volür comes across as a tour-de-force of bass tech: dual true isobaric dynamic drivers deliver deep, textured rumble with a “speaker-in-the-room” feel, while the Tia BA adds pronounced upper-treble energy. Ergonomics are excellent—compact metal shells, smooth nozzles that take tips well, and a best-in-class top two-pin connection that makes cable swaps effortless. Build feels built-to-last and the purple faceplate looks classy, though a more varied aesthetic across 64 Audio’s lineup would be welcome.

The APEX modules change flavor more than fundamentals: M20 adds a touch more bass, M15 strikes the best balance, M12 runs leaner, and MX is very flat and generally skippable; running it empty is a hard no. On music, Volür shines with EDM/modern productions, projecting holographic low-end and vivid dynamics; in dense mixes with strong instrumentals and vocals, the midrange can feel overrun and less engaging. Versus peers: U4s tracks similarly in bass level (with different modules), Elysian Annihilator brings stronger 3 kHz vocal presence while Volür counters with superior bass texture, and Monarch MKIII sounds more overtly U-shaped with greater mid/upper energy.

As a package, this is a fantastic IEM—arguably a favorite from 64 Audio—yet not flawless. The price is steep, the APEX ecosystem feels like paid tuning switches, and there’s some treble peaking plus occasional vocal thinness; a simpler, cheaper, M12-style fixed tuning would be a dream. For listeners prioritizing hip-hop, rap, and modern genres, Volür can absolutely be endgame; for vocal-centric or classical libraries, it’s impressive but not definitive. Overall verdict: a five-star recommendation for those who can afford it, anchored by class-leading bass and exceptional build, with clear trade-offs noted.

Mids: B Treble: A- Dynamics: A- Soundstage: A-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Fatfreq Maestro SE User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

64 Audio Volur User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Fatfreq Maestro SE Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

64 Audio Volur Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.5

Gaming Grade

A

Fatfreq Maestro SE Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • The response is even and composed, lending itself to effortless genre hopping. Voices sit comfortably in the mix.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • It manages detail and layering well enough, even if the stage feels only moderately sized. You get a clear sense of left and right, if not depth.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A-
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A
Treble performance is excellent—airy, extended, and beautifully controlled. It reveals subtle studio ambiance.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging delivers precise, stable placement with instruments occupying tangible points in space. It locks each element into a steady position.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

64 Audio Volur Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • It presents a smooth, well-integrated tonal balance that plays nicely with many styles. It maintains natural timbre across the range.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • You get a well-rounded technical package that keeps separation, detail, and staging in harmony. It's a solid middle ground between fun and fidelity.
Bass S-
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids B+
The region sounds composed and expressive, giving vocals a natural spotlight. It keeps vocals front and center nicely.
Treble A-
The treble is exquisitely tuned, combining crystal detail with relaxed delivery. Micro-details emerge effortlessly.
Dynamics A
Dynamic performance is excellent, combining sharp transients with strong contrast. Transients snap with authority.
Soundstage A-
Immersion steps up dramatically as width, depth, and height integrate into a cohesive hologram. Everything sounds naturally spaced.
Details A+
Complex productions unravel completely, letting you examine every thread. Textures are rendered with exquisite finesse.
Imaging A+
Even dense mixes remain locked in place, reinforcing the illusion of physical performers. The stage remains stable regardless of complexity.
Gaming A
Clear spatial presentation handles directional cues effectively. Distinguishes key gameplay sounds while maintaining decent immersion. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Fatfreq Maestro SE User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

64 Audio Volur User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer