Fatfreq Maestro SE [7.2/10]

Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for Fatfreq Maestro SE

IEMRanking.com Home Fatfreq Maestro SE
My Ranking My Favorites

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz Crin
Bad Guy Good Audio

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5.6

Gaming Grade

B-

Fatfreq Maestro SE Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+7BA+4EST

Tuning Type: Neutral with bass boost

Price (Msrp): $1,900

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Thunderous bass. Proper midbass, brilliant trebs. 12 drivers Female Vocals can sound un natural in some instances

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 6.7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Good bass with neutral mids and treble, but sub-par techs for its price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: A+ Mids: B Treble: A- Details: B Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Fatfreq Maestro SE Infos

Compare Fatfreq Maestro SE to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Thieaudio Valhalla
 8.9
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Fiio FX17
 8.9
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better mids and treble.
Show Elysian Apostle
 8.9
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better details, imaging and bass.
Show Dunu Glacier
 8.7
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. 64 Audio U12t
64 Audio U12t offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show 64 Audio U12t
 8.5
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better bass, details and imaging.
Show 64 Audio Tia Trio
 8.5
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Symphonium x Elise Audio Europa
 8.5
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Symphonium Crimson
 8.4
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. 64 Audio Volur
Similar overall performance.
Show 64 Audio Volur
 8.4
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. ThieAudio Prestige LTD
ThieAudio Prestige LTD offers better details, mids and imaging.
Show ThieAudio Prestige LTD
 8.3
Best IEMs from $1,000 - $2,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass A+
Excellent bass response - powerful yet controlled. Deep extension with authoritative slam while maintaining clarity.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Details B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B-
Moderate spatial presentation conveys general directionality. Suitable for casual play where precision isn't critical. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer