Fatfreq Maestro SE - Reviews & Ratings

5 Reviews (A Tier | 7.5/10)

Home Fatfreq Maestro SE

Summary

Based on 5 reviews, the Fatfreq Maestro SE is earning strong approval from most reviewers, who appreciate its engaging character.

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz Crin Head-Fi.org
Bad Guy Good Audio
Yifang

Average Reviewer Score:

7.5

Strongly Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Fatfreq Maestro SE Details

Driver Configuration: 1DD+7BA+4EST

Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost

Top Neutral with Bass Boost IEMs

Price (Msrp): $1,900

Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:

Buy your next IEM on
Linsoul
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
HiFiGO
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra
Buy your next IEM on
Aliexpress
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra

Reviews

Reviewed by: Yifang

Yifang 9 Reviewer Score
S Tuning
S Tech
Thunderously deep bass and decent technicalities around. Better than Grand Maestro from having less treble sharpness/sibilance. Very difficult to drive (more than STORM) and NEEDS power to make the bass reach it's potential. Tonally sounds bright despite talks all being about bass. Mids aren't the smoothest.

Yifang original ranking

Yifang Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Bad Guy Good Audio

Bad Guy Good Audio 8.5 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Thunderous bass. Proper midbass, brilliant trebs. 12 drivers Female Vocals can sound un natural in some instances

Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking

Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube Channel
Bass: A+ Mids: A+ Treble: A+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 6.7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
B Tech
Good bass with neutral mids and treble, but sub-par techs for its price.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: A+ Mids: B Treble: A- Details: B Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
B+ Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.8 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the Fatfreq Maestro SE at an average of 3.7/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Generally Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Fatfreq Maestro SE Infos

Discuss Fatfreq Maestro SE with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Fatfreq Maestro SE discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Fatfreq Maestro SE to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Thieaudio Valhalla
Thieaudio Valhalla offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Thieaudio Valhalla
 8.9
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Elysian Apostle
Elysian Apostle offers better mids and treble.
Show Elysian Apostle
 8.8
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Fiio FX17
Fiio FX17 offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Fiio FX17
 8.8
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. AFUL Dawn-X
AFUL Dawn-X offers better details, mids and treble.
Show AFUL Dawn-X
 8.7
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Dunu Glacier
Dunu Glacier offers better details, imaging and bass.
Show Dunu Glacier
 8.7
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Lime Ears Incognita
Similar overall performance.
Show Lime Ears Incognita
 8.5
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. 64 Audio Tia Trio
64 Audio Tia Trio offers better bass, details and imaging.
Show 64 Audio Tia Trio
 8.5
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Symphonium Crimson
Symphonium Crimson offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Symphonium Crimson
 8.4
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. 64 Audio Volur
64 Audio Volur offers better details, imaging and bass.
Show 64 Audio Volur
 8.4
Fatfreq Maestro SE vs. Letshuoer Cadenza 12
Letshuoer Cadenza 12 offers better details, imaging and mids.
Show Letshuoer Cadenza 12
 8.4
Best IEMs from $1,000 - $2,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • The response is even and composed, lending itself to effortless genre hopping. Voices sit comfortably in the mix.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • It manages detail and layering well enough, even if the stage feels only moderately sized. You get a clear sense of left and right, if not depth.
Bass A+
You hear powerful yet disciplined low-end slam that extends effortlessly. It marries sub-bass depth with great texture.
Mids A-
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble A
Treble performance is excellent—airy, extended, and beautifully controlled. It reveals subtle studio ambiance.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging A-
Excellent imaging delivers precise, stable placement with instruments occupying tangible points in space. It locks each element into a steady position.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer