Softears Twilight VS FATfreq Scarlett Mini
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Softears Twilight and FATfreq Scarlett Mini use 1DD and 1DD+2BA driver setups respectively. Softears Twilight costs $930 while FATfreq Scarlett Mini costs $799. Softears Twilight is $131 more expensive. FATfreq Scarlett Mini holds a slight 0.3-point edge in reviewer scores (7.6 vs 7.9). FATfreq Scarlett Mini has significantly better bass with a 1.8-point edge, Softears Twilight has better mids with a 0.6-point edge, FATfreq Scarlett Mini has better treble with a 0.8-point edge, FATfreq Scarlett Mini has significantly better dynamics with a 3.6-point edge and Softears Twilight has better soundstage with a 0.8-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Softears Twilight | FATfreq Scarlett Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 7.5 | 9.3 |
| Mids | 8 | 7.4 |
| Treble | 7 | 7.8 |
| Details | 7.6 | 7.5 |
| Soundstage | 8 | 7.2 |
| Imaging | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| Dynamics | 5 | 8.6 |
| Tonality | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Technicalities | 7.4 | 7.6 |
Softears Twilight Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.6Strongly Favorable
FATfreq Scarlett Mini Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.9Strongly Favorable
Reviews Comparison
Softears Twilight (more reviews)
Softears Twilight reviewed by Jaytiss
8.3
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Softears Twilight reviewed by Jays Audio
8
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Softears Twilight reviewed by Gizaudio Axel
8
Reviewer Score
Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube ChannelSoftears Twilight reviewed by Bad Guy Good Audio
7.7
Reviewer Score
Bad Guy Good Audio original ranking
Bad Guy Good Audio Youtube ChannelSoftears Twilight reviewed by Crin
7
Reviewer Score
Softears Twilight reviewed by Tim Tuned
6.5
Reviewer Score
Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
FATfreq Scarlett Mini (more reviews)
FATfreq Scarlett Mini reviewed by Z-Reviews
2025-09-26
8
* score normalized
Scarlett Mini is framed as a bass experiment first, IEM second: a ~$666 set (or $833 with the light-red “upgraded” cable) that pushes a 30 dB sub-bass shelf so far that every track becomes a bass test. The low end is described as omnipresent—a physical, room-shaking effect that makes even lean recordings throb—while mids/treble behave like a competent $200–$300 set with decent stage and a sweet, crisp top end (not kilobuck texture). It’s also hard to drive, likely due to a heavy crossover network, and scales with power more in weight than in refinement. The upgraded cable gets a thumbs-down on feel and value; the advice is to skip the cable upcharge.
This tuning is called weird but fun—a “bass cannon” for listeners who’ve heard everything and want their library to feel new and outrageous again. The warning is clear: extended use may ruin perception of normal gear because the sub-bass sets a new baseline; take “vacations” from it. For quality-first listeners seeking separation and balance, the rest of the signature won’t justify the price; for bass die-hards, paying a few hundred dollars just for the bass trick might be exactly the point. Measurements won’t look neutral, and that’s by design—this is a specialized, end-of-the-road indulgence rather than a daily driver.
Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
FATfreq Scarlett Mini reviewed by IEMRanking AI
2025-09-26
7.8
Reviewer Score
The FATfreq Scarlet Mini is a hybrid IEM positioned in the brand’s “Scarlet” line with a 1DD+2BA configuration and a stated focus on sub-bass power and treble extension; retailer specs list a single dynamic driver plus two balanced armatures, while the brand highlights a “hyper tweeter” system that extends to 40 kHz . Frequency-response measurements published by a retailer show an extreme sub-bass shelf below ~200 Hz with restrained upper-mids and a smooth, airy top end—consistent with a U-shaped, sub-bass-emphasized tuning rather than a neutral target . FATfreq and dealers market the model with the “world’s first 30 dB sub-bass shelf” claim; while that’s a marketing line, the published curves support a very elevated low end in practice .
On technicalities, the Scarlet Mini emphasizes slam and macrodynamics over microdetail: the powerful sub-bass delivers texture and weight, but can modestly mask lower-mid articulation on dense mixes, while treble extension from the dedicated HF driver provides adequate air without aggressive bite . Practical specs—105 dB sensitivity and 16 Ω impedance—suggest it’s easy to drive; the included SPC cable and accessory set are typical for the segment, and the U-shaped, bass-heavy tuning targets listeners prioritizing impact over strict neutrality . Street pricing varies by region and cable option, but the official product page lists an MSRP tier around $799 for the base configuration, which frames expectations on value relative to other mid/upper-mid offerings .
Softears Twilight Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Warm
Brand: Softears Top Softears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $930
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
FATfreq Scarlett Mini Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA
Tuning Type: U-Shaped (sub-bass emphasis)
Price (Msrp): $799
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Softears Twilight User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
FATfreq Scarlett Mini User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Softears Twilight Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.5Gaming Grade
B+FATfreq Scarlett Mini Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
8Gaming Grade
A+Softears Twilight Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
FATfreq Scarlett Mini Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.
Average Technical Grade
A- Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Softears Twilight User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFATfreq Scarlett Mini User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review