FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum VS EPZ 530
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum and EPZ 530 are in-ear monitors. FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum costs $770 while EPZ 530 costs $700. FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum is $70 more expensive. EPZ 530 holds a clear 0.8-point edge in reviewer scores (6.8 vs 7.7). EPZ 530 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, EPZ 530 has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge, FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and EPZ 530 has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum | EPZ 530 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 7.5 | 7.7 |
| Mids | 5 | 6 |
| Treble | 5 | 6 |
| Details | 6 | 7.7 |
| Soundstage | 6.5 | 7 |
| Imaging | 5.5 | 7.7 |
| Dynamics | 9 | 7 |
| Tonality | 6.4 | 7.3 |
| Technicalities | 6.9 | 7 |
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
EPZ 530 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $770
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
EPZ 530 Details
Driver Configuration: 5BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $700
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
EPZ 530 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.3Gaming Grade
BEPZ 530 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.6Gaming Grade
B+FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
EPZ 530 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A-- Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
7.8
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5.7
Reviewer Score
EPZ 530 Reviews
Reviewed by: Z-Reviews
8
* score normalized
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
7.5
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
7.5
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewEPZ 530 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review