FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum - Reviews & Ratings

6 Reviews (B Tier | 7/10)

Home FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum

Summary

Based on 6 reviews, the FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum is earning a favorable overall impression from reviewers thanks to its consistent performance.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7

Cautiously Favorable

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.8

Gaming Grade

B+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7.8 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
S Tech
Rating: A+ | Value: ⭐ | Gaming: 🎮🎮🎮 | Comfort: 4 very technical. wide. well tuned planar grainy treble due to the air

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
B+ Tuning
B Tech
I don't want to like, but I love.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: B Dynamics: S Soundstage: A-

Reviewed by: Jays Audio

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
S Tech
Bright and full sound, very detailed, sparkly, airy, tons of treble extenstion... but it gets fatiguing with the stock filters. Blue filter has the best balance but still doesn't scale too well. 300 mesh filter goes hard tho - check modded ranking at bottom.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Audio Amigo

Audio Amigo 6 * score rescaled + normalized
An interesting sort of Science Project IEM. FatFreq tried to extract as much Sub-bass power and texture while making an airy, detailed planar that isn't fatiguing. They succeeded, and with the Super Stage NOAH modules, this is the most open and wide sounding single Planar I've ever heard. Wish it was cheaper and didn't come with the Ares S II cable.

Audio Amigo original ranking

Audio Amigo Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.7 Reviewer Score
B- Tuning
B- Tech
I struggle with this, perhaps it was insertion depth but that unconventional iem shape should never have been greenlit Average bass, thin midrange, unbearably sibilant treble

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A Mids: C+ Treble: C- Soundstage: B Details: B Imaging: B-

Reviewed by: Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7.5 * score rescaled + normalized
2 community members have rated the FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Infos

Discuss FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better treble, mids and imaging.
8.1
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Thieaudio Hype 10
Thieaudio Hype 10 offers better treble, mids and imaging.
8
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better treble, soundstage and mids.
8
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Thieaudio Origin
Thieaudio Origin offers better mids, bass and treble.
7.9
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. ORIVETI OH700VB
ORIVETI OH700VB offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.9
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. 7th Acoustics Supernova
7th Acoustics Supernova offers better mids, treble and imaging.
7.9
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Intuaura Purple
Similar overall performance.
7.8
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Aful Cantor
Aful Cantor offers better treble, details and imaging.
7.7
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. LetShuoer EJ07
LetShuoer EJ07 offers better mids, details and imaging.
7.7
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. FlipEars Legion
FlipEars Legion offers better mids, imaging and treble.
7.7
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Tuning lands in a pleasing sweet spot with mostly coherent frequency integration. Tonality stays consistent from track to track.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • You get a controlled, composed performance, marrying decent clarity with a still-modest sense of space. A safe technical performer for the price bracket.
Bass A
Expect a commanding bass response that reaches deep without clouding the mix. There's both slam and nuance in equal measure.
Mids C+
The mids are solid and dependable, though not especially remarkable. Vocals stay reasonably grounded in the mix.
Treble C+
Highs come through with reasonable clarity while staying mostly smooth. Sibilance is mostly controlled.
Dynamics S
This is reference-grade dynamic performance with breathtaking realism. It mirrors live-music intensity perfectly.
Soundstage B+
A satisfying balance of width and depth yields a stage that feels organized and engaging. Imaging lines up with the intended mix.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging B-
A stable phantom center appears, lending vocals a consistent anchor. It maintains a coherent phantom center.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer