FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum [6.8/10]
Reviews (3), scores and comparisons for FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum
IEMRanking.com
Home
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
6.8Cautiously Favorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.3Gaming Grade
BFATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Details
Driver Configuration:
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $770
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
7.8
Reviewer Score
B+
Tuning
B
Tech
I don't want to like, but I love.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+
Treble: B
Dynamics: S
Soundstage: A-
Reviewed by: Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
A-
Tuning
S
Tech
Bright and full sound, very detailed, sparkly, airy, tons of treble extenstion... but it gets fatiguing with the stock filters. Blue filter has the best balance but still doesn't scale too well. 300 mesh filter goes hard tho - check modded ranking at bottom.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5.7
Reviewer Score
B-
Tuning
B-
Tech
I struggle with this, perhaps it was insertion depth but that unconventional iem shape should never have been greenlit
Average bass, thin midrange, unbearably sibilant treble
Bass: A
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Soundstage: B
Details: B
Imaging: B-
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum Infos
Compare FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Softears RSV MK II
Softears RSV MK II offers better mids, treble and imaging.
|
8.3 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Thieaudio Hype 10
Thieaudio Hype 10 offers better treble, mids and imaging.
|
8.1 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Letshuoer EJ07
Letshuoer EJ07 offers better mids, details and imaging.
|
8 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Thieaudio Origin
Thieaudio Origin offers better mids, bass and treble.
|
7.8 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Aful Cantor
Aful Cantor offers better treble, details and imaging.
|
7.8 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. 7th Acoustics Supernova
7th Acoustics Supernova offers better mids, treble and imaging.
|
7.8 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. EPZ 530
EPZ 530 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7.7 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Moondrop S8
Moondrop S8 offers better treble, mids and imaging.
|
7.6 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. FlipEars Legion
FlipEars Legion offers better mids, imaging and treble.
|
7.5 |
|
FATfreq x Effect Audio: Quantum vs. Sennheiser IE600
Sennheiser IE600 offers better mids, treble and details.
|
7.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass
A
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics
S
Reference-class dynamics: perfect micro/macro contrast with lightning transients. Utterly realistic reproduction of musical energy.
Soundstage
B+
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Details
B
Good resolution with clear articulation of nuances. Reveals recording nuances and maintains clarity in complex passages.
Imaging
B-
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review