Fender FXA2 VS Binary Dynaquattro

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Fender FXA2 and Binary Dynaquattro are in-ear monitors. Fender FXA2 costs $270 while Binary Dynaquattro costs $260. Fender FXA2 is $10 more expensive. Binary Dynaquattro holds a decisive 3.4-point edge in reviewer scores (4 vs 7.4). Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better mids with a 3-point edge, Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better treble with a 3.5-point edge and Binary Dynaquattro has significantly better soundstage with a 4-point edge.

Insights

Metric Fender FXA2 Binary Dynaquattro
Bass 4 4
Mids 4 7
Treble 3.5 7
Details 4.5 4.5
Soundstage 4 8
Imaging 4 4
Dynamics 9 9
Gaming capabilities 4.1 7.2

Fender FXA2 Aggregated Review Score

Fender FXA2 Average Reviewer Scores

Shuwa-T

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable


Binary Dynaquattro Aggregated Review Score

Binary Dynaquattro Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews Jays Audio Jaytiss Gizaudio Axel

Average Reviewer Score:

7.4

Generally Favorable


Fender FXA2 User Review Score

Fender FXA2 Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Binary Dynaquattro User Review Score

Binary Dynaquattro Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Fender FXA2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.1

Gaming Grade

C-

Binary Dynaquattro Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

7.2

Gaming Grade

A-

Fender FXA2 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C-
Subdued bass response that stays mostly in the background. Lacks energy and impact but maintains basic definition.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D+
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Soundstage C-
Average soundstage - adequate width but flat presentation. Reasonable instrument separation but lacks layering and depth.
Details C
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Binary Dynaquattro Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A-
  • Pleasing tonal balance with good technical control. Minor quirks present but not distracting. Demonstrates decent genre versatility.

Average Technical Grade

A-
  • Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Mids A-
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble A-
Excellent treble: airy, extended and well-controlled. Great micro-detail retrieval without sibilance or harshness.
Dynamics S
Reference-class dynamics: perfect micro/macro contrast with lightning transients. Utterly realistic reproduction of musical energy.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Gaming A-
Good fundamental spatial awareness for most gaming scenarios. Handles basic positioning well but may lack nuance in complex situations. Value-to-cost may not be optimal for gaming-focused users.

Fender FXA2 Reviews

Fender FXA2 reviewed by:

Shuwa-T 4 Reviewer Score
D+ Tuning
C- Tech
Riddled with technical limitations and somewhat poor timbre

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

- Shuwa-T
Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: D+ Soundstage: C- Details: C Imaging: C-

Binary Dynaquattro Reviews

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 7.2 * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Binary Dynaquattro or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $194.99

Buy Binary Dynaquattro on Hifigo

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Jays Audio 7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech
Natural vocals, good treble extension, bass is tight and more resolving vs 61t and Davinci. Overall very well balanced and clean. There are some small peaks at 8-10k and 15-20K which can be an issue on some songs, and there is masking around 4-8k region, but overall, solid all-rounder.

Jays Audio original ranking

Jays Audio Youtube Channel
- Jays Audio

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Jaytiss 7.8 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
It has great tuning, but lack serverly in some areas. Very fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: A- Treble: A- Dynamics: S Soundstage: A+

Binary Dynaquattro reviewed by:

Gizaudio Axel 7.5 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A- Tech
Shines when driven properly. Excellent bass, vocal-forward tuning, and natural timbre. Hard to drive, could use more treble extension.

Gizaudio Axel original ranking

Gizaudio Axel Youtube Channel
- Gizaudio Axel

Fender FXA2 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Binary Dynaquattro User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer