Fiio FD 15 VS Kinera Celest Phoenixcall

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

Fiio FD 15 and Kinera Celest Phoenixcall are in-ear monitors. Fiio FD 15 costs $150 while Kinera Celest Phoenixcall costs $129. Fiio FD 15 is $21 more expensive. Fiio FD 15 holds a decisive 1.6-point edge in reviewer scores (7.3 vs 5.7). Fiio FD 15 has significantly better mids with a 3-point edge, Fiio FD 15 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge and Fiio FD 15 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric Fiio FD 15 Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
Bass 7.3 4
Mids 7 4
Treble 6 4
Details 7.3 6
Soundstage 7 6
Imaging 7.3 4
Dynamics 5 5
Tonality 6.3 5.6
Technicalities 6 6.3
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Fiio FD 15 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Fiio FD 15 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

7.3

Generally Favorable


Kinera Celest Phoenixcall Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Kois Archive Jaytiss
Audionotions
Web Search

Average Reviewer Score:

5.7

Mixed


Reviews Comparison

Fiio FD 15 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 7.3 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Balanced and even. Solid set that is mid focused.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: A- Treble: B Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall (more reviews)

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 6 Reviewer Score
Fun. Unique tuning that actually works. The FR looks like it would completely offend but to the ear, it actually never offends. Lots of bass impact, good transients. Worth it just to have something different.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 5.6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A+ Tech
Rating: C+ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 8 nice planar treble lack subbass and mids

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
Funky and agressive tuning that turns into a detail and dynamics machine for its price - could shine with minor adjustments.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: C- Details: B Imaging: C-

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Web Search

2025-07-17
uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech

The Kinera Celest Phoenixcall offers a distinctive tribrid driver configuration (1DD+2BA+2 Micro Planar) that delivers an energetic, V-shaped sound signature with pronounced mid-bass impact and bright upper-mids. Bass is punchy and textured, though sub-bass extension rolls off slightly, while vocals and instruments can occasionally tip into shoutiness or sibilance in busy tracks . Technical performance is a mixed bag: imaging and separation are precise, but timbre often feels unnatural with metallic tinges, and the soundstage leans taller than wider .

Comfort and aesthetics are clear strengths. The transparent resin shells showcase internal components artistically, and the included 8-core SPC cable feels premium . However, the thick nozzles may challenge smaller ears, and the provided eartips often exacerbate upper-frequency harshness—tip-rolling is recommended . While the unboxing experience impresses with its themed accessories (including a metal bookmark), the carrying case is notably cramped .


Fiio FD 15 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Fiio FD 15 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.1

Gaming Grade

B

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6

Gaming Grade

B

Fiio FD 15 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • An honest, middle-of-the-road performance preserves structure without chasing micro-detail. It's respectable for everyday listening sessions.
Mids A-
Midrange performance is excellent, with natural timbre and great detail. Vocals feel lifelike and full-bodied.
Treble B
Treble is articulate and clean, adding excitement without harshness. It adds sparkle without harshness.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Soundstage A-
Excellent spatial presentation that is wide, deep, and tall with precise instrument placement. Width, depth, and height all feel expanded.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass C-
Low-end presence is gentle and restrained, favoring balance over slam. There's enough presence for casual listening.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging C-
Separation is good enough for casual listening yet misses audiophile precision. Depth remains limited but present.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

Fiio FD 15 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer