Kinera Celest Phoenixcall - Reviews & Ratings

5 Reviews (B Tier | 5.7/10)

Home Kinera Celest Phoenixcall

Summary

Based on 5 reviews, the Kinera Celest Phoenixcall is a decent choice according to reviewers, who see it as a safe recommendation for general listening.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.7

Mixed

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6

Gaming Grade

B

Reviews

Reviewed by: Audionotions

Audionotions 6 Reviewer Score
Fun. Unique tuning that actually works. The FR looks like it would completely offend but to the ear, it actually never offends. Lots of bass impact, good transients. Worth it just to have something different.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Kinera Celest Phoenixcall or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $129.99

Buy Kinera Celest Phoenixcall on HiFiGO

Reviewed by: Kois Archive

Kois Archive 5.6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
A+ Tech
Rating: C+ | Gaming: 🎮🎮 | Comfort: 8 nice planar treble lack subbass and mids

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
Fantastic packaging tribrid for this price.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
Funky and agressive tuning that turns into a detail and dynamics machine for its price - could shine with minor adjustments.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: C- Details: B Imaging: C-

Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech

The Kinera Celest Phoenixcall offers a distinctive tribrid driver configuration (1DD+2BA+2 Micro Planar) that delivers an energetic, V-shaped sound signature with pronounced mid-bass impact and bright upper-mids. Bass is punchy and textured, though sub-bass extension rolls off slightly, while vocals and instruments can occasionally tip into shoutiness or sibilance in busy tracks . Technical performance is a mixed bag: imaging and separation are precise, but timbre often feels unnatural with metallic tinges, and the soundstage leans taller than wider .

Comfort and aesthetics are clear strengths. The transparent resin shells showcase internal components artistically, and the included 8-core SPC cable feels premium . However, the thick nozzles may challenge smaller ears, and the provided eartips often exacerbate upper-frequency harshness—tip-rolling is recommended . While the unboxing experience impresses with its themed accessories (including a metal bookmark), the carrying case is notably cramped .


Kinera Celest Phoenixcall Infos

Discuss Kinera Celest Phoenixcall with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Kinera Celest Phoenixcall discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Kinera Celest Phoenixcall to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. 7hz x Crinacle Divine
7hz x Crinacle Divine offers better treble, mids and imaging.
7.4
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.4
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. CCA HYDRO
CCA HYDRO offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
7.3
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, bass and imaging.
7.3
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. HIDIZS MP143
HIDIZS MP143 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
7.2
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. Myer Audio CKLVX D41
Myer Audio CKLVX D41 offers better mids, imaging and bass.
7.1
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better mids, treble and imaging.
7.1
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better mids, soundstage and dynamics.
7
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
7
Kinera Celest Phoenixcall vs. Tanchjim NORA
Tanchjim NORA offers better mids, imaging and treble.
6.9
Best IEMs from $100 - $200

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass C-
Low-end presence is gentle and restrained, favoring balance over slam. There's enough presence for casual listening.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging C-
Separation is good enough for casual listening yet misses audiophile precision. Depth remains limited but present.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Buy

Footer