Kinera Celest PhoenixCall - Reviews & Ratings
4 Reviews (B Tier | 5.8/10)
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.8Mixed
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.6Gaming Grade
B-Kinera Celest PhoenixCall Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA+2Planar
Tuning Type: V-Shaped
Brand: Kinera Top Kinera IEMs
Price (Msrp): $129
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Audionotions
6
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: Jaytiss
5
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Reviewed by: Nymz
4.6
Reviewer Score
Reviewed by: IEMRanking AI
2025-07-17
7.4
Reviewer Score
The Kinera Celest Phoenixcall offers a distinctive tribrid driver configuration (1DD+2BA+2 Micro Planar) that delivers an energetic, V-shaped sound signature with pronounced mid-bass impact and bright upper-mids. Bass is punchy and textured, though sub-bass extension rolls off slightly, while vocals and instruments can occasionally tip into shoutiness or sibilance in busy tracks . Technical performance is a mixed bag: imaging and separation are precise, but timbre often feels unnatural with metallic tinges, and the soundstage leans taller than wider .
Comfort and aesthetics are clear strengths. The transparent resin shells showcase internal components artistically, and the included 8-core SPC cable feels premium . However, the thick nozzles may challenge smaller ears, and the provided eartips often exacerbate upper-frequency harshness—tip-rolling is recommended . While the unboxing experience impresses with its themed accessories (including a metal bookmark), the carrying case is notably cramped .
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
newKinera Celest PhoenixCall Infos
Compare Kinera Celest PhoenixCall to popular alternatives
VS
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Aful Explorer
Aful Explorer offers better treble, bass and imaging.
|
7.1 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Dunu Kima 2
Dunu Kima 2 offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
7 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Tanchjim Fission
Tanchjim Fission offers better mids, treble and soundstage.
|
6.9 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Kiwi Ears Airoso
Kiwi Ears Airoso offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
6.8 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Truthear Nova
Truthear Nova offers better bass, imaging and mids.
|
6.7 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Kiwi Ears ETUDE
Kiwi Ears ETUDE offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
6.6 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Shozy P20
Shozy P20 offers better mids and treble.
|
6.6 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Kefine Quatio
Kefine Quatio offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
6.6 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Padsmith IEM
Padsmith IEM offers better mids, soundstage and dynamics.
|
6.6 |
|
Kinera Celest PhoenixCall vs. Simgot EM6L
Simgot EM6L offers better bass, imaging and mids.
|
6.5 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C+- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
B-- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review