HIDIZS MP143 VS Kinera Celest Phoenixcall

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

HIDIZS MP143 and Kinera Celest Phoenixcall use 1P and 1DD+2BA+2Planar driver setups respectively. HIDIZS MP143 costs $129 while Kinera Celest Phoenixcall costs $129. HIDIZS MP143 holds a decisive 1.5-point edge in reviewer scores (7.2 vs 5.7). HIDIZS MP143 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, HIDIZS MP143 has significantly better treble with a 1-point edge and HIDIZS MP143 has significantly better soundstage with a 1-point edge.

Insights

Metric HIDIZS MP143 Kinera Celest Phoenixcall
Bass 7.2 4
Mids 5 4
Treble 5 4
Details 7.2 6
Soundstage 7 6
Imaging 7.2 4
Dynamics 5 5
Tonality 6.8 5.6
Technicalities 6.5 6.3
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough HIDIZS MP143 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

HIDIZS MP143 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

7.2

Generally Favorable


Kinera Celest Phoenixcall Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.7

Mixed


Reviews Comparison

HIDIZS MP143 reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7.2 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Rating: A- | Value: ⭐ | Comfort: 8 nice planar bass. swappable nozzle possible channel imbalance

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

HIDIZS MP143 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6.3 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Nice and smooth, maybe too smooth.
Youtube Video Summary

Build & Fit: a quirky but comfy shell with a flatter profile that sits at an unusual angle, plus three nozzle filters that meaningfully change the tonality. The swappable tips/nozzles kit is generous; the cable is fine but a bit thin 2-wire and unexciting. Unboxing is compact and simple. Despite the odd shape, fit and stability are solid.

Tuning & Graphs: the gold/“rose gold” nozzle reads as the most balanced, with a bassy, smooth, slightly rich presentation and enough detail without turning shouty. The silver filter adds treble energy; the red calms the presence region (≈1–3 kHz) for an easier listen. Versus peers: HIDIZS MS3 comes across too hot around 4–6 kHz; MP145 has stronger raw SQ but fits worse and costs more; Letshuoer S08 is more neutral/plain and trades blows; TruthEar Hexa is cheaper with cleaner upper-mids but lighter bass/dynamics; EA500 LM runs brighter; AFUL Explorer is pricier yet more extended and refined; budget picks like CCA Trio or EW200 offer value but with caveats on comfort/treble.

Verdict: clean, clear vocals, a satisfying low end, respectable technicalities, and highs that are “okay.” Responds well to EQ: a touch more sub-bass, a tidier mid-bass, and a small pull in that 4–6 kHz zone tighten things up and make the set shine. The whale-themed “SALT” concept is genuinely cool, and the early-bird $79 pricing made it an easy pick; even in the $80–$100 bracket it’s well worth considering. Not perfect, but a three-star value with flexible tuning and comfort that many will prefer—especially if a richer, non-shouty profile is on the wishlist.

Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: A-

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
Fantastic packaging tribrid for this price.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C- Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

HIDIZS MP143 (more reviews)

HIDIZS MP143 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 8.1 * score rescaled + normalized
25 community members have rated the Hidizs MP143 at an average of 4.3/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall (more reviews)

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Audionotions

Audionotions 6 Reviewer Score
Fun. Unique tuning that actually works. The FR looks like it would completely offend but to the ear, it actually never offends. Lots of bass impact, good transients. Worth it just to have something different.

Audionotions original ranking

Website (Audionotions)

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 4.6 Reviewer Score
C- Tuning
C+ Tech
Funky and agressive tuning that turns into a detail and dynamics machine for its price - could shine with minor adjustments.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: C- Mids: C- Treble: C- Details: B Imaging: C-

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall reviewed by Web Search

uses AI-Search to turn user, reddit and head-fi reviews into clear, concise summaries.
Web Search 7.4 Reviewer Score
A- Tuning
A Tech

The Kinera Celest Phoenixcall offers a distinctive tribrid driver configuration (1DD+2BA+2 Micro Planar) that delivers an energetic, V-shaped sound signature with pronounced mid-bass impact and bright upper-mids. Bass is punchy and textured, though sub-bass extension rolls off slightly, while vocals and instruments can occasionally tip into shoutiness or sibilance in busy tracks . Technical performance is a mixed bag: imaging and separation are precise, but timbre often feels unnatural with metallic tinges, and the soundstage leans taller than wider .

Comfort and aesthetics are clear strengths. The transparent resin shells showcase internal components artistically, and the included 8-core SPC cable feels premium . However, the thick nozzles may challenge smaller ears, and the provided eartips often exacerbate upper-frequency harshness—tip-rolling is recommended . While the unboxing experience impresses with its themed accessories (including a metal bookmark), the carrying case is notably cramped .


HIDIZS MP143 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

HIDIZS MP143 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.6

Gaming Grade

B+

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6

Gaming Grade

B

HIDIZS MP143 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B+
  • Overall technicalities are acceptable, delivering enough clarity for casual sessions. Imaging is serviceable though not immersive.
Mids C+
Expect a competent midrange that keeps vocals grounded and instruments clear. Tone is acceptable across multiple genres.
Treble C+
Treble feels agreeable overall, bringing sparkle without significant fatigue. You get a polite sense of air.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage A-
All dimensions bloom together, producing an expansive venue that feels carefully rendered. You can map the ensemble easily.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance.

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • A mostly enjoyable signature keeps things listenable despite a handful of quirks. It handles most playlists without major complaints.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass C-
Low-end presence is gentle and restrained, favoring balance over slam. There's enough presence for casual listening.
Mids C-
It delivers a workable midrange that could benefit from smoother transitions. Timbre isn't quite convincing yet.
Treble C-
Expect serviceable treble that keeps detail audible without much polish. It keeps the highs audible without elegance.
Dynamics C+
Dynamic performance is decent, delivering respectable macro swings with limited nuance. There's a fair amount of macrodynamic swing.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Details B
Finer gestures snap into focus without sounding clinical or forced. Layering holds strong across genres.
Imaging C-
Separation is good enough for casual listening yet misses audiophile precision. Depth remains limited but present.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

HIDIZS MP143 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Kinera Celest Phoenixcall User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer