KZ Zenith VS Geek Wold GK10

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

KZ Zenith and Geek Wold GK10 use 1DD and 1DD+2BA+2Piezo driver setups respectively. KZ Zenith costs $60 while Geek Wold GK10 costs $50. KZ Zenith is $10 more expensive. KZ Zenith holds a decisive 3-point edge in reviewer scores (6.8 vs 3.8). KZ Zenith has significantly better mids with a 5-point edge and KZ Zenith has significantly better treble with a 4-point edge.

Insights

Metric KZ Zenith Geek Wold GK10
Bass 6.8 1
Mids 6 1
Treble 5 1
Details 6.8 1
Soundstage 5 3.8
Imaging 6.8 1
Dynamics 5 3.8
Tonality 6.9 1
Technicalities 6 1
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough KZ Zenith and Geek Wold GK10 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

KZ Zenith Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Kois Archive Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

6.8

Cautiously Favorable

Geek Wold GK10 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz
Head-Fi.org

Average Reviewer Score:

3.8

Poor

Reviews Comparison

KZ Zenith reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 7 * score rescaled + normalized
5 community members have rated the KZ Zenith at an average of 4.4/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Excellent.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Geek Wold GK10 reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.6 * score rescaled + normalized
7 community members have rated the Geek Wold GK10 at an average of 3.6/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Generally Favorable.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

KZ Zenith (more reviews)

KZ Zenith reviewed by Kois Archive

Kois Archive 7.4 Reviewer Score
S- Tuning
A- Tech
Rating: A- | Value: ⭐⭐⭐ | Comfort: 9 the best from KZ driver quality not the best

Kois Archive original ranking

Kois Archive Youtube Channel

KZ Zenith reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
It's a middie, but a good option.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: B Treble: C+ Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: C+

Geek Wold GK10 (more reviews)

Geek Wold GK10 reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 1 Reviewer Score
E- Tuning
E- Tech
Coherency, timbre, and quality - at least these are missing.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: E- Mids: E- Treble: E- Details: E- Imaging: E-

KZ Zenith User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Geek Wold GK10 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ Zenith Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.3

Gaming Grade

B

Geek Wold GK10 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

1

Gaming Grade

E-

KZ Zenith Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B+
  • Expect a friendly tonal balance that could use polish but remains inviting. Great for casual listening, less so for purists.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Technical ability is serviceable, keeping basic detail intact across simpler tracks. It keeps up with acoustic tracks without much fuss.
Mids B
It offers engaging mid frequencies with pleasing clarity and layering. Details emerge without becoming harsh.
Treble C+
Treble is decent, offering acceptable extension without harshness. It balances presence with a touch of restraint.
Dynamics C+
Expect solid impact overall, even if finer gradations feel a touch smoothed. Micro-details could still be sharper.
Soundstage C+
You start to perceive distinct rows of players even if the ceiling still feels low. Layering is present but still modest.
Gaming B
Decent spatial awareness for fundamental positioning. Creates satisfying atmosphere in story-driven games while handling basic directional cues.

Geek Wold GK10 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E-
  • Balance is severely off, producing a harsh, unpleasant listen regardless of genre. Long sessions quickly become exhausting.

Average Technical Grade

E-
  • Everything sounds flat and suffocated, with even elementary passages losing definition and energy. Expect little in the way of micro-details.
Bass E-
Bass output is extremely faint, barely registering in the mix. Even subtle bass lines are hard to follow.
Mids E-
Everything in the mid band sounds muted, as if it’s playing from another room. Songs feel like they're missing their core.
Treble E-
Highs sound veiled and distant, draining life from the mix. Hi-hats fade before they start.
Details E-
Extremely poor resolution causes fine details to vanish, leaving only a vague impression of the music's structure. Everything sounds blurred and undefined.
Imaging E-
A hazy central blob replaces any notion of left or right placement. Directional cues are basically absent.
Gaming E-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

KZ Zenith User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Geek Wold GK10 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Footer