HZSound Heart Mirror VS Juzear Clear

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs

HZSound Heart Mirror and Juzear Clear are in-ear monitors. HZSound Heart Mirror costs $50 while Juzear Clear costs $50. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 1.9-point edge in reviewer scores (4.4 vs 6.4). Juzear Clear has significantly better mids with a 1.3-point edge, Juzear Clear has slightly better treble with a 0.3-point edge, Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 2-point edge and Juzear Clear has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge.

Insights

Metric HZSound Heart Mirror Juzear Clear
Bass 3.3 6.4
Mids 3.7 5
Treble 3.7 4
Details 4.3 6.4
Soundstage 5.5 6
Imaging 4 6.4
Dynamics 3 5
Tonality 3.9 4.8
Technicalities 4.3 4
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

HZSound Heart Mirror Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

4.4

Unfavorable


Juzear Clear Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive


Reviews Comparison

HZSound Heart Mirror (more reviews)

HZSound Heart Mirror reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 6* * score rescaled + normalized

HZSound Heart Mirror reviewed by Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 5.4 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
B- Tech
Comment: Treble tuning is one of the best up to $200 range. Neutral bright decently tuned, decent soundstage, surprising treble tuning Limp bass with zero texture, might be too bright for some

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: B Soundstage: B- Details: B Imaging: C+

HZSound Heart Mirror reviewed by Crin

Crin 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech

HZSound Heart Mirror reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 3.2 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
D+ Tech
Sounds like vocalists are asphyxiating. Very thin note-weight.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: C- Imaging: C-

HZSound Heart Mirror reviewed by Nymz

Nymz 2.6 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
D Tech
Budget tech king due to neutral bright tuning. Needs and loves power. My favourite sub-50 set so far. Might come out as shouty/hot. Responds well to EQ and Moding. Beaten by CRA(bassy) and Titan S for my library.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: E+ Mids: D Treble: E+ Details: D Imaging: D

Juzear Clear (more reviews)

Juzear Clear reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score rescaled + normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Juzear Clear or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $49

Buy Juzear Clear on HiFiGO

Juzear Clear reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
This little dude is pretty, and hammers. Bass machine.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B

Juzear Clear reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.3 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the JUZEAR CLEAR at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

HZSound Heart Mirror User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Juzear Clear User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

HZSound Heart Mirror Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

Juzear Clear Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

HZSound Heart Mirror Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D+
  • Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass D
The bass sits quietly in the background, providing only faint support. Live recordings lose their stage thump.
Mids D+
Midrange is highly uneven, veering between shouty peaks and hollow dips. Tonality swings between shouty and withdrawn.
Treble D+
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics D
Volume shifts feel constrained, so build-ups plateau before releasing. Build-ups plateau before resolving.
Soundstage B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.
Details C-
Average resolution that reveals the basics while missing many of the subtleties. It reveals enough to stay engaging.
Imaging C-
Center information lands in the right area but not with laser focus. Separation is adequate for casual listening.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

HZSound Heart Mirror User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer