HZSound Heart Mirror [4.4/10]
Reviews (5), scores and comparisons for HZSound Heart Mirror
IEMRanking.com
Home
HZSound Heart Mirror
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.4Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.2Gaming Grade
C-HZSound Heart Mirror Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Bright neutral
Price (Msrp): $50
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
6*
* score normalized
5.4
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
B-
Tech
Comment: Treble tuning is one of the best up to $200 range. Neutral bright decently tuned, decent soundstage, surprising treble tuning Limp bass with zero texture, might be too bright for some
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: B
Soundstage: B-
Details: B
Imaging: C+
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
3.2
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D+
Tech
Sounds like vocalists are asphyxiating. Very thin note-weight. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: D
Dynamics: D
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
2.6
Reviewer Score
E+
Tuning
D
Tech
Budget tech king due to neutral bright tuning. Needs and loves power. My favourite sub-50 set so far. Might come out as shouty/hot. Responds well to EQ and Moding. Beaten by CRA(bassy) and Titan S for my library.
Bass: E+
Mids: D
Treble: E+
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
HZSound Heart Mirror Infos
Compare HZSound Heart Mirror to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
|
6.4 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
|
6.2 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
|
6 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
|
6 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red
TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
5.9 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
5.8 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better mids, dynamics and soundstage.
|
5.7 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. CCA Rhapsody
CCA Rhapsody offers better mids and treble.
|
5.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D+- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
D+
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble
D+
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Soundstage
B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width. Some depth perception but height dimension remains underdeveloped.
Details
C-
Average resolution - reveals basic elements but misses subtleties. Satisfactory for casual listening but lacks refinement.
Imaging
C-
Average imaging - reasonable localization but lacks specificity. Instruments have general positions but lack pinpoint accuracy.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review