HZSound Heart Mirror - Reviews & Ratings
5 Reviews (C Tier | 4.4/10)
Home
HZSound Heart Mirror
Summary
Based on 5 reviews, the HZSound Heart Mirror is drawing mixed impressions from reviewers, with opinions often splitting along personal preferences.
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
4.4Unfavorable
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.2Gaming Grade
C-HZSound Heart Mirror Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Neutral, Bright
Price (Msrp): $50
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
Reviewed by: Super* Review
6*
* score rescaled + normalized
Reviewed by: Shuwa-T
5.4
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
B-
Tech
Comment: Treble tuning is one of the best up to $200 range.
Neutral bright decently tuned, decent soundstage, surprising treble tuning
Limp bass with zero texture, might be too bright for some
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: B
Soundstage: B-
Details: B
Imaging: C+
Reviewed by: Crin
5
Reviewer Score
C+
Tuning
C+
Tech
Reviewed by: Precogvision
3.2
Reviewer Score
D
Tuning
D+
Tech
Sounds like vocalists are asphyxiating. Very thin note-weight.
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: D
Treble: D
Dynamics: D
Details: C-
Imaging: C-
Reviewed by: Nymz
2.6
Reviewer Score
E+
Tuning
D
Tech
Budget tech king due to neutral bright tuning. Needs and loves power. My favourite sub-50 set so far. Might come out as shouty/hot. Responds well to EQ and Moding. Beaten by CRA(bassy) and Titan S for my library.
Bass: E+
Mids: D
Treble: E+
Details: D
Imaging: D
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
HZSound Heart Mirror Infos
Discuss HZSound Heart Mirror with the community
Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "HZSound Heart Mirror discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.
Compare HZSound Heart Mirror to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
| IEM | alt. Score |
|---|---|
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. KZ Zenith
KZ Zenith offers better mids, dynamics and treble.
|
6.8 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
|
6.4 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Apos x Community Rock Lobster
Apos x Community Rock Lobster offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.3 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better mids, soundstage and treble.
|
6.3 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Kbear KB02
Kbear KB02 offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
|
6.3 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics, mids and soundstage.
|
6.2 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. Moondrop Lan 2 Pop
Moondrop Lan 2 Pop offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
|
6.2 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, soundstage and mids.
|
6.2 |
|
HZSound Heart Mirror vs. HZSound Heart Mirror Zero
Similar overall performance.
|
6.2 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D+- Tonality remains inconsistent, with uneven peaks and dips that disrupt musical flow. You'll constantly notice peaks or dips pulling focus.
Average Technical Grade
C-- Even moderate complexity exposes the limited resolution and narrow sense of space. Technical fans will find it lacking.
Bass
D
The bass sits quietly in the background, providing only faint support. Live recordings lose their stage thump.
Mids
D+
Midrange is highly uneven, veering between shouty peaks and hollow dips. Tonality swings between shouty and withdrawn.
Treble
D+
Highs feel erratic, with dips and spikes that make the signature unpredictable. It alternates between splashy and dull.
Dynamics
D
Volume shifts feel constrained, so build-ups plateau before releasing. Build-ups plateau before resolving.
Soundstage
B-
Decent spatial presentation with noticeable width and a modest step forward in depth perception. There's a mild sense of width to enjoy.
Details
C-
Average resolution that reveals the basics while missing many of the subtleties. It reveals enough to stay engaging.
Imaging
C-
Center information lands in the right area but not with laser focus. Separation is adequate for casual listening.
Gaming
C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review