Kiwi Ears CANTA and Ikko Opal OH2 are in-ear monitors. Kiwi Ears CANTA costs $89 while Ikko Opal OH2 costs $80. Kiwi Ears CANTA is $9 more expensive. Kiwi Ears CANTA holds a decisive 1.3-point edge in reviewer scores (6.5 vs 5.2). Ikko Opal OH2 has significantly better mids with a 1-point edge, Kiwi Ears CANTA has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge and Kiwi Ears CANTA has significantly better dynamics with a 1-point edge.
Insights
Metric | Kiwi Ears CANTA | Ikko Opal OH2 |
---|---|---|
Bass | 6.5 | 5 |
Mids | 4 | 5 |
Treble | 7 | 4 |
Details | 6.5 | 5 |
Soundstage | 6 | 5.2 |
Imaging | 6.5 | 5 |
Dynamics | 5 | 4 |
Tonality | 6 | 4.7 |
Technicalities | 7.3 | 4.7 |
Kiwi Ears CANTA Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Ikko Opal OH2 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Kiwi Ears CANTA Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Kiwi Ears Top Kiwi Ears IEMs
Price (Msrp): $89
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Ikko Opal OH2 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Warm neutral
Brand: Ikko Top Ikko IEMs
Price (Msrp): $80
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Kiwi Ears CANTA User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Ikko Opal OH2 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Kiwi Ears CANTA Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
6.9Gaming Grade
B+Ikko Opal OH2 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.7Gaming Grade
CKiwi Ears CANTA Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
A-- Competent technical presentation. Handles separation and detail well in most tracks, with modest soundstage and acceptable imaging capabilities.
Ikko Opal OH2 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Kiwi Ears CANTA Reviews
Bright set with lots of treble detail. Airy, splashy, and shimmery with great extension. Isn't sharp or metallic in the timbre, but not 100% "natural" either, comes down to preference. Mid-volume set, good with slower genres, not rec for high energy tracks, can get much at higher volumes. Favors female vocals, male could be a bit light and could use more power, but vocals aren't thin or shrill sounding like the Oracle MK2s. Not gonna float everyone's boat, but it's a unique listen (not the same planar tuning yay) and worth having as a collectors piece. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
check links for more info: Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Ikko Opal OH2 Reviews
A more balanced interpretation of Ikko's usual sound. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Kiwi Ears CANTA User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewIkko Opal OH2 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review