Ikko Opal OH2 [5.2/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for Ikko Opal OH2

IEMRanking.com Home Ikko Opal OH2

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

5.2

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.7

Gaming Grade

C

Reviews

Super* Review 6* * score normalized
Precogvision 4.4 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C Tech
A more balanced interpretation of Ikko's usual sound.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: C+ Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C- Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Ikko Opal OH2 Infos

Compare Ikko Opal OH2 to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble and dynamics.
6.5
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better bass, mids and treble.
6.5
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Tanchjim 4U
Similar overall performance.
6.4
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
6.3
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better treble, bass and mids.
6.3
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Moondrop Aria 2
Moondrop Aria 2 offers better treble, bass and mids.
6.2
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Pula Unicrom
Pula Unicrom offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.1
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Truthear Pure
Truthear Pure offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
6.1
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Truthear Hexa
Truthear Hexa offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
6.1
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. EPZ X Tipsy Star One
Similar overall performance.
6
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

C
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer