IEMRanking.com
Home
Ikko Opal OH2
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
5.2Mixed to Negative
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
4.7Gaming Grade
CIkko Opal OH2 Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD
Tuning Type: Warm neutral
Brand: Ikko Top Ikko IEMs
Price (Msrp): $80
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
A more balanced interpretation of Ikko's usual sound. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: C+
Mids: C+
Treble: C-
Dynamics: C-
Details: C+
Imaging: C+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
Ikko Opal OH2 Infos
Compare Ikko Opal OH2 to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Kiwi Ears CANTA
Kiwi Ears CANTA offers better treble and dynamics.
|
6.5 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Moondrop May
Moondrop May offers better bass, mids and treble.
|
6.5 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Tanchjim 4U
Similar overall performance.
|
6.4 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Simgot EW300
Similar overall performance.
|
6.3 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Simgot EA500LM
Simgot EA500LM offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
6.3 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Moondrop Aria 2
Moondrop Aria 2 offers better treble, bass and mids.
|
6.2 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Pula Unicrom
Pula Unicrom offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.1 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Truthear Pure
Truthear Pure offers better treble, bass and dynamics.
|
6.1 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. Truthear Hexa
Truthear Hexa offers better treble, mids and dynamics.
|
6.1 |
Ikko Opal OH2 vs. EPZ X Tipsy Star One
Similar overall performance.
|
6 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
C- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
C+
Average bass performance - present but unremarkable. Has reasonable texture but lacks depth and physicality.
Mids
C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble
C-
Average treble performance - present but lacking refinement. Some graininess or splashiness affects clarity.
Dynamics
C-
Average dynamics - passable but unexciting. Transients are rounded and micro-dynamics lack refinement.
Details
C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging
C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming
C
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review