Juzear Butterfly 61T VS Crinear Daybreak
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Juzear Butterfly 61T and Crinear Daybreak use 1DD+6BA and 1DD+2BA+2mPT driver setups respectively. Juzear Butterfly 61T costs $219 while Crinear Daybreak costs $170. Juzear Butterfly 61T is $49 more expensive. Crinear Daybreak holds a clear 0.6-point edge in reviewer scores (7 vs 7.6). Crinear Daybreak carries a user score of 7.4. Juzear Butterfly 61T has better bass with a 0.6-point edge, Crinear Daybreak has better mids with a 0.6-point edge, Juzear Butterfly 61T has slightly better soundstage with a 0.3-point edge and Juzear Butterfly 61T has slightly better imaging with a 0.3-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Juzear Butterfly 61T | Crinear Daybreak |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Mids | 7.4 | 8 |
| Treble | 7 | 7.3 |
| Details | 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Soundstage | 7.9 | 7.6 |
| Imaging | 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Dynamics | 7.7 | 7.8 |
| Tonality | 7.6 | 7.8 |
| Technicalities | 6.8 | 7.3 |
Juzear Butterfly 61T Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7Cautiously Favorable
Crinear Daybreak Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.6Strongly Favorable
Reviews Comparison
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Jaytiss
7.3
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Buy Juzear Butterfly 61T on HiFiGO
Ad
Price: $164.99
Buy Juzear Butterfly 61T on HiFiGO
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Jaytiss
7.4
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
The CrinEar Daybreak features a metal nozzle and metal faceplate with comfortable contours, though the fit is noted as a bit dainty and small. Isolation is practically non-existent, and the fit isn't particularly secure. The included cable looks nice and photographs well, featuring interchangeable terminations for versatility, but its chin slider moves too easily and isn't recommended for those needing a functional one. The case is deemed aesthetically pleasing and feels good, though not especially premium, magnetically shutting with adequate space.
Sonically, the Daybreak leans boring and somewhat sterile or dry. It offers nice bass and a lot of upper mids, which are done decently with a standard 3K peak. However, the combination of this upper-mid focus and an incisive peak around 8K contributes to a perceived harshness and sharpness, lacking in overall detail retrieval. Graph comparisons reveal its signature has significantly more upper mids and often more bass than competitors like the Moondrop Dusk or TruthEar Nova, resulting in a less engaging listen. Sets like the Defiant, Chopin, and Performer 7 are cited as more engaging alternatives at similar or lower prices, with the Defiant specifically recommended over the Daybreak. Even the Punch Audio martillo and Moondrop Meteor, sharing driver configurations, are considered more fun or better tuned.
Ultimately, the Daybreak is a solid A-minus IEM, well-packaged and a commendable first effort for the brand, but it's not hypeworthy or a benchmark. It lacks imagination and falls short against numerous compelling alternatives around its price point, such as the Performer 7, ZOS Defiant, Chopin, or discounted planar options like the Aether. While a good value, especially if found on sale via Linsoul or the used market, its piercing upper mids and failure to truly excel make it hard to fully recommend over the competition.
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Buy Crinear Daybreak on Linsoul
Ad
Price: $169.99
Buy Crinear Daybreak on Linsoul
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Z-Reviews
7.2
* score rescaled + normalized
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Z-Reviews
6
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
The Crinacle Daybreak is a technically excellent IEM that offers exceptional clarity and detail retrieval without being fatiguing. Its five-driver configuration delivers a cohesive and precise sound signature that is clean, flat, and incredibly balanced. The bass is present and punchy but never exaggerated, making it a perfect tool for studying music and hearing every nuance in a recording.
However, this precision comes at the cost of fun. The tuning is described as a little dry and somewhat intimate, lacking the expansive soundstage and flavorful character that makes other IEMs more engaging for pure enjoyment. While the build is solid with an acceptable cable and nice connectors, its looks are admittedly boring. It’s a perfectly cooked meal that follows the recipe without any surprises.
Ultimately, the Daybreak is a highly respected and much-loved IEM that fills a specific niche for a clean, reference-like sound. It’s a business suit of an IEM, but it wouldn't be the first choice for someone looking for a more exciting, fun, or "f***ed up" sound signature to get them moving. It commands respect for its technical merits, even if it isn't to everyone's personal taste.
Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Super* Review
6*
* score rescaled + normalized
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Super* Review
8*
* score rescaled + normalized
Youtube Video Summary
The CrinEar Daybreak lands at $170 as the second IEM from Crinacle, positioned as a more accessible follow-up to the limited-edition Meta. This tribrid features a single dynamic driver, two balanced armatures, and two micro planars handling the highs. The build includes compact, semi-custom dark smoky resin shells offering good stability and comfort, though the molding might be slightly aggressive for some. The included cable provides swappable terminations (3.5mm and 4.4mm) but is noted for being somewhat stiff and kink-prone. Accessories are solid for the price, including a leatherette case and multiple tip options, with the stock silicones recommended for optimal fit due to the slightly longer nozzle.
Sonically, the Daybreak delivers what the review calls the best tonal balance yet within the popular "new meta" tuning category. Its frequency response is described as exceptionally neutral and natural from the mid-bass upwards, creating a low-contrast, chill, and non-fatiguing listen with forward, textured vocals and non-existent sibilance. However, this comes with trade-offs: the bass lacks ultimate tightness and slam, and the treble exhibits a light, wispy quality (likened to cotton candy) that lacks some bite and definition. While technical performance like imaging is solid, it doesn't stand out as exceptional.
In direct comparisons with six competitors around $200 (including the Meta, Binary x Chopin, EPZ P50, Ziigaat Lush, Truthear Pure, and Kiwi Ears KE4), the Daybreak consistently ranked highest for tonality. It was praised as a modern benchmark for natural tuning at its price. However, it fell behind in bass physicality and treble incisiveness. Ultimately rated a strong four stars, the Daybreak is highlighted as an excellent choice for those prioritizing a refined, natural midrange and easy listening experience over sheer technical prowess or visceral impact, earning the label of a "modern-day Etymotic ER2XR" with far better comfort.
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube ChannelJuzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Jays Audio
6
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
The CrinEar Daybreak offers a balanced, clean, and non-fatiguing sound signature, functioning effectively as an all-rounder. Every frequency region is solid, delivering a smooth presentation without harshness or overwhelming warmth. The bass provides a slight sub-bass rumble and integrates cleanly into the mids, avoiding bleed, though it lacks significant impact, slam, or deep texture. Similarly, the mid-range and vocals are well-separated and forward enough, free from congestion or odd timbre, but don't specialize. The treble has enough extension and air, avoiding darkness or excessive sharpness, but misses out on micro-detail, sparkle, and expansive staging. It’s a decent, inoffensive performer across the board, described aptly as a "very good vanilla ice cream cone".
Technically, the Daybreak is competitive but not class-leading. Sets like the Meta, Ziigaat Crescent, Kiwi Ears Astral, Simgot EM6L, or TruthEar Nova offer slightly better detail retrieval, imaging, and resolution. Its main challenge comes from remarkably similar competitors, particularly the EPZ P50 and SLIIVO SL224, which share nearly identical tuning, driver configurations, and technical performance around the same $160-$180 price point. The P50 leans slightly more vocal-centric, while the SL224 offers marginally better bass texture and treble detail (though costing more). If you already own either, the Daybreak becomes largely redundant. Against alternatives like the bassier, more dynamic Ziigaat Odyssey ($200), the Daybreak feels safer but less engaging at higher volumes. Compared to Harman-tuned sets like the Supermix 4, Chopin, or Nova, the Daybreak boasts fuller tonality and less fatigue but gives up some layering and detail.
Ultimately, the Daybreak is a competent, well-packaged all-rounder at $170, delivering a balanced and inoffensive listen suitable for any genre library. However, it fails to stand out uniquely in a crowded field. Its sound signature is replicated almost exactly by the existing P50 and SL224. While it earns a half recommendation as a solid option for those seeking a non-fatiguing all-rounder who *don't* own those twins, it's unlikely to become a favorite due to its lack of distinctive character. Value is decent, but alternatives offer more specialization or technical prowess for similar or lower cost.
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Juzear Butterfly 61T (more reviews)
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by ATechReviews
8.4
* Score computed by IEMRanking.com
Youtube Video Summary
This set arrives with a small pocketable case, a very comfortable shell and a supple cable that together make it easy to forget that anything is in the ears. With the right tips, the Juzear Butterfly 61T offers excellent passive noise isolation, blocking more outside noise than most IEMs in the collection and approaching the Studio 4 in isolation. Comfort is effectively a non-issue despite the larger nozzle, and the combination of isolation, comfort and a fatigue-free tuning makes it very easy to lose track of time while listening.
On the low end, the 61T delivers a level of textured bass that is rare in this price bracket, combining strong sub-bass extension with a beautifully articulated mid-bass. Kick drums and bass lines have clear layering and detail yet stay clean and controlled, with just a touch of bass bleed that slightly softens ultimate midrange clarity but adds pleasing fullness to pianos, acoustic guitars and male vocals. The lower mids carry a bit of warmth and body without sounding muddy, while the rest of the midrange stays clear, detailed and completely free of shout or harshness across rock, metal, jazz, EDM and pop.
The upper mids and treble are tuned with a gentle dip around 4–6 kHz that keeps things smooth and non-fatiguing even at higher volumes, letting female vocals and saxophones sound extended, organic and natural rather than aggressive. Treble itself sits in a neutral, slightly reserved place with enough air and sparkle for clarity, though some listeners who prefer a brighter, airier presentation may wish for a bit more. Where the 61T really pulls ahead is in its soundstage and imaging: width and especially depth are above average, with convincing 360-degree placement that feels more immersive than many peers and even outperforms more expensive sets like DaVinci in stage and imaging. Technical detail is clearly above most sub-$200 options and, while a step below benchmark sets like Blessing 2 or Studio 4 in sheer microdetail, the overall mix of tuning, stage and comfort makes this an IEM that is very easy to recommend wholeheartedly for its price.
ATechReviews Youtube Channel
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Audio-In Reviews
7.8
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
Butterfly 61T arrives as a seven driver hybrid at the 220 USD price point, with 3D printed shells that feel solid in hand and a faceplate design that uses iridescent Abalone to create a subtle butterfly wing effect. The shells are on the larger side to accommodate the six balanced armatures and 10 mm dynamic driver, but the inner curvature is well shaped, so comfort remains good for average sized ears, with only potential concerns for very small ears. The included cable feels premium, offers a choice of 3.5 or 4.4 termination, uses robust two pin connectors, and matches the earpieces nicely with gunmetal grey hardware, coming together as a package that actually looks and feels a bit above the usual 200 USD standard.
Sonically, Butterfly 61T presents a U shaped signature with emphasis on sub bass and treble, while the midrange sits slightly behind. The sub bass focus and solid mid bass give the tuning strong impact, note weight, and a sense of richness, and the 10 mm dynamic driver delivers punchy, dynamic hits on kick drums and low mid percussive instruments. The trade off is a warmer transition from bass into the lower mids that introduces some bass bleed and a touch of veil, trimming a bit of midrange detail and transparency compared to more strictly controlled sets. Even so, midrange detail remains good for the price, upper mids are shaped so that vocals have enough presence without shout, and overall tonality stays engaging and musical rather than aggressive or fatiguing.
Treble is a clear highlight, with Butterfly 61T providing energetic but controlled top end that renders cymbal strikes and higher stringed instruments with satisfying decay, texture, and air. Extension is strong enough that recordings with shimmer and ambience come through convincingly, without pushing into harshness. Technical performance is very good for this bracket: soundstage reaches above average width for an in ear, imaging and layering feel confident, and positional cues lock instruments and vocals in place in a way that stands alongside the better options around 200 USD. Against peers like Chopan, Performer 5, and Origin, Butterfly 61T offers smoother upper mids, more refined treble, and comparable or better technical performance, earning a place as a new 200 USD king. It cannot quite match the naturalness and refinement of higher tier sets like Pilgrim or Studio 4 and remains no giant killer, but within the sub 300 USD range, it stands out as one of the most compelling choices, with the main true upgrade being Dunu Da Vinci.
Audio-In Reviews original ranking
Audio-In Reviews Youtube ChannelJuzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Yifang
6.5
Reviewer Score
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Gizaudio Axel
6.5
Reviewer Score
Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube ChannelCrinear Daybreak (more reviews)
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Joyce's Review
9.5
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
The CrinEar Daybreak is presented as the first mass production model under Crinacle as a personal brand project, targeting an IEF Preference 229 style curve at around 169 USD. The shell looks very ergonomic with a thin, long nozzle that fits securely, and the semi transparent body reveals a 3D printed internal waveguide. Inside, a tri driver configuration with one dynamic driver subwoofer, two custom tuned balanced armatures and dual micro planar tweeters is supported by a refined silver plated copper cable with interchangeable 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm plugs and a firm leatherette case, giving the whole package a mature and well thought out feel.
In terms of tuning, the bass delivers a just right amount of power and impact with most of the weight in the sub bass and a quicker rolling mid bass that keeps the low end clean. Sub bass hits sit close to the ear and neck area, giving a sense of depth without bloating, while decay is quick, snappy and well separated from the mids and highs. Vocals sit intimate and close with excellent resolution and imaging, presenting a neutral and clear midrange where grit and texture of voices and instruments are preserved, and only a slight touch of brightness and sibilance reminds that this is an intentionally more revealing tuning.
The treble shows a classic 3 kHz rise with a 7 kHz dip to tame excess sibilance and then a gentle, extended upper region with subtle peaks that create a strong sense of air and openness. Treble remains bright, clean and crisp, with tight imaging and a good balance between openness and control, only leaning a little dry and thin in the very top where its more analytical character shows. Compared with sets like the K4, Daybreak offers stronger instrument separation, more defined vocal edges and notably better horizontal and vertical soundstage, combining punchy but controlled bass, clear vocal lines and textured instruments into a presentation that feels highly resolving yet coherent and great value at this price.
Joyce's Review original ranking
Joyce's Review Youtube ChannelCrinear Daybreak reviewed by Audionotions
8
Reviewer Score
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Paul Wasabii
7.6
* Score computed by IEMRanking.com
Youtube Video Summary
CrinEar DayBreak presents a balanced end-to-end tuning that shifts with power. At low volume it can read warm and soft, but when driven a bit harder the bass and treble rise to meet the mids, revealing clean impact, clear treble extension from the BA + microplaner stack, and a more open presentation. Vocals carry natural body from a lower-mid bump without being pushed unnaturally forward, so the overall character leans more versatile than strictly vocal-centric.
Versus Meta, DayBreak fixes the bass shelf and stretches upper energy for easier air, trading some midrange push for better layering and imaging. Compared with Odyssey, high-volume listening yields more space and separation; against vocal sets like Cadenza 4 or Zero Red, DayBreak gives up a bit of mid focus but wins on genre range, especially EDM. Not a sub-bass monster, yet the bass hits harder than the graph suggests, with cleaner texture and a healthier sub-to-mid-bass ratio. The only nit is a slightly energetic 2–5 kHz zone that some will prefer a dB lower.
Call it an unintentional banger: the treble is sloped enough to avoid glare while keeping drops vivid, letting big builds explode without turning sharp. For listeners who play a notch louder and want balanced energy at both ends with mids that stay natural, DayBreak delivers a satisfying hybrid package for the price.
Paul Wasabii Youtube Channel
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Fox Told Me So
7.2
Reviewer Score
This is it.
Crinear Daybreak's tuning follows the New Meta family with two quirks: a dip at 400 Hz that slightly thins male vocals, and a dip around 8 kHz that smooths treble but softens cymbals/overtones. Otherwise it’s safe, balanced, and within preference bounds.
Bass has moderate body with audible rumble and quick decay, though slam could hit harder; Mids sit neutral, neither pushed nor recessed, keeping instruments evenly balanced; Treble rolls off smoothly—pleasant, but lacks the final lift that would open it up. Resolution is average for the price: clear layers but compressed depth, like a lasagna being pressed flat.
Within the $169 bracket, Daybreak is neutral, natural, and non-fatiguing—an easy daily driver.
Fox Told Me So original ranking
Fox Told Me So Youtube Channel
Crinear Daybreak reviewed by Web Search
7.5
Reviewer Score
The CrinEar Daybreak is a tri-brid IEM built around a 5-driver array—1DD + 2BA + 2 micro-planar tweeters—with a moderate 20 Ω load and 105 dB/mW sensitivity, making it easy to drive from portable sources. MSRP sits at $169.99, placing it squarely in the competitive mid-budget segment. These core specs are confirmed on the official product page and retail listings.
Tonally, Daybreak trends toward neutral with a mild sub-bass lift and restrained warmth, but listener experience can swing with tip choice. Multiple independent impressions note a touch of upper-mid / lower-treble energy (ear-gain region) on stock narrow-bore tips, which relaxes with wide-bore options; overall midrange balance and resolution are strong for the price. These observations are echoed in in-depth evaluations and measurements from Headphones.com’s reviews.
Build is a resin shell with metal faceplate and a compact pseudo-custom profile; comfort is generally good, though the 6 mm nozzle and angle may not be ideal for every ear. Accessory quality is serviceable—SPC cable with interchangeable 3.5 mm / 4.4 mm terminations, a leatherette case, and basic tips—leaving room for aftermarket tip rolling to fine-tune treble behavior and staging. These physical details and inclusions are documented by the maker and retailers.
Juzear Butterfly 61T Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+6BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Juzear Top Juzear IEMs
Price (Msrp): $219
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Crinear Daybreak Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+2BA+2mPT
Tuning Type: Neutral with Bass Boost
Brand: CrinEar Top CrinEar IEMs
Price (Msrp): $169.99
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Juzear Butterfly 61T User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Crinear Daybreak User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score:
Based on 1 user reviews
7.4Generally Favorable
Juzear Butterfly 61T Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.1Gaming Grade
A-Crinear Daybreak Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.5Gaming Grade
AJuzear Butterfly 61T Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- It presents a smooth, well-integrated tonal balance that plays nicely with many styles. It maintains natural timbre across the range.
Average Technical Grade
B+- The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Crinear Daybreak Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- It presents a smooth, well-integrated tonal balance that plays nicely with many styles. It maintains natural timbre across the range.
Average Technical Grade
A-- It manages detail and layering well enough, even if the stage feels only moderately sized. You get a clear sense of left and right, if not depth.
Juzear Butterfly 61T User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewCrinear Daybreak User Reviews
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewA well-toned, easy-listening IEM that excels at midrange clarity even if it doesn’t dazzle technically.
Pros
Balanced and non-fatiguing tuning with smooth, natural mids.Cons
Bass lacks slam and treble can feel veiled or lacking crisp sparkle.Find your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS