Juzear Butterfly 61T VS MYER SL224
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Juzear Butterfly 61T and MYER SL224 use 1DD+6BA and 2DD+2BA+4Micro-Planar driver setups respectively. Juzear Butterfly 61T costs $219 while MYER SL224 costs $270. MYER SL224 is $51 more expensive. MYER SL224 holds a clear 0.5-point edge in reviewer scores (7 vs 7.5). Juzear Butterfly 61T has significantly better bass with a 1.2-point edge, MYER SL224 has better treble with a 0.6-point edge, MYER SL224 has better dynamics with a 0.5-point edge, Juzear Butterfly 61T has better soundstage with a 0.5-point edge and Juzear Butterfly 61T has slightly better imaging with a 0.4-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Juzear Butterfly 61T | MYER SL224 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 8.7 | 7.5 |
| Mids | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Treble | 7 | 7.7 |
| Details | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Soundstage | 7.9 | 7.5 |
| Imaging | 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Dynamics | 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Tonality | 7.6 | 7.8 |
| Technicalities | 6.8 | 7.6 |
Juzear Butterfly 61T Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7Cautiously Favorable
MYER SL224 Aggregated Review Score
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
7.5Generally Favorable
Reviews Comparison
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Audio-In Reviews
7.8
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
Butterfly 61T arrives as a seven driver hybrid at the 220 USD price point, with 3D printed shells that feel solid in hand and a faceplate design that uses iridescent Abalone to create a subtle butterfly wing effect. The shells are on the larger side to accommodate the six balanced armatures and 10 mm dynamic driver, but the inner curvature is well shaped, so comfort remains good for average sized ears, with only potential concerns for very small ears. The included cable feels premium, offers a choice of 3.5 or 4.4 termination, uses robust two pin connectors, and matches the earpieces nicely with gunmetal grey hardware, coming together as a package that actually looks and feels a bit above the usual 200 USD standard.
Sonically, Butterfly 61T presents a U shaped signature with emphasis on sub bass and treble, while the midrange sits slightly behind. The sub bass focus and solid mid bass give the tuning strong impact, note weight, and a sense of richness, and the 10 mm dynamic driver delivers punchy, dynamic hits on kick drums and low mid percussive instruments. The trade off is a warmer transition from bass into the lower mids that introduces some bass bleed and a touch of veil, trimming a bit of midrange detail and transparency compared to more strictly controlled sets. Even so, midrange detail remains good for the price, upper mids are shaped so that vocals have enough presence without shout, and overall tonality stays engaging and musical rather than aggressive or fatiguing.
Treble is a clear highlight, with Butterfly 61T providing energetic but controlled top end that renders cymbal strikes and higher stringed instruments with satisfying decay, texture, and air. Extension is strong enough that recordings with shimmer and ambience come through convincingly, without pushing into harshness. Technical performance is very good for this bracket: soundstage reaches above average width for an in ear, imaging and layering feel confident, and positional cues lock instruments and vocals in place in a way that stands alongside the better options around 200 USD. Against peers like Chopan, Performer 5, and Origin, Butterfly 61T offers smoother upper mids, more refined treble, and comparable or better technical performance, earning a place as a new 200 USD king. It cannot quite match the naturalness and refinement of higher tier sets like Pilgrim or Studio 4 and remains no giant killer, but within the sub 300 USD range, it stands out as one of the most compelling choices, with the main true upgrade being Dunu Da Vinci.
Audio-In Reviews original ranking
Audio-In Reviews Youtube ChannelBuy Juzear Butterfly 61T on HiFiGO
Ad
Price: $164.99
Buy Juzear Butterfly 61T on HiFiGO
MYER SL224 reviewed by Audio-In Reviews
7.4
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
The Meyer Audio SL224 comes in around the $269 mark with a very complete package: a comfortable 3D-printed resin shell, genuine shell-inspired faceplate material and a soft, modular cable that feels like one of the better cables at this price point. Fit is easy and secure, isolation is decent, and the modular terminations (4.4 balanced, 3.5 single-ended, USB-C) make it a practical daily driver for different sources. Overall build, design and accessories feel thoughtfully put together for this price range.
Sonically, the SL224 leans toward a neutral, vocal-focused tuning with highlighted upper mids and sub-bass. Bass is more sub-bass centered, adding a solid foundation and extra engagement on tracks with low-end emphasis, but mid-bass and low mids are relatively restrained, which can make the presentation sound a bit thin and bass-light depending on the library. Midrange clarity is strong and vocals in particular come across as natural and expressive, yet the combination of forward upper mids and lighter note weight means some listeners may wish for more warmth, richness and body, especially when compared with fuller, more balanced sets at and below this price.
Treble is where the SL224 really shines: the micro planar array delivers excellent treble detail and extension without slipping into metallic or unnatural timbre, adding air and micro-nuance to the presentation. Technical performance is a clear strength, with precise imaging, clean separation and solid layering that place it among the stronger options under $300, even if soundstage width itself sits around average. While other sets like 61T, Da Vinci or Volume S may offer a more balanced, richer and smoother overall tonality for many listeners, the SL224 stands out as a compelling choice for vocal lovers who prioritize clarity, treble detail and technical performance and who don’t mind trading some warmth and bass weight for that mid-centric focus.
Audio-In Reviews original ranking
Audio-In Reviews Youtube ChannelBuy MYER SL224 on HiFiGO
Ad
Price: $230
Buy MYER SL224 on HiFiGO
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Jaytiss
7.3
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
MYER SL224 reviewed by Jaytiss
8.4
Reviewer Score
Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Gizaudio Axel
6.5
Reviewer Score
Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube ChannelMYER SL224 reviewed by Gizaudio Axel
6.5
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
Packaging overdelivers: a modular cable with 3.5/4.4/USB-C and an included dongle that gets loud enough, seven pairs of silicone tips plus foam, and a small zip case (nice but tight). The shell looks premium with a depth-effect faceplate and a metal nozzle (≈6.1 mm lip); fit is snug though potentially big for smaller ears. Build and accessories feel thoughtful at the price, with only a slightly rubbery cable texture to nitpick.
Tuning is a smooth, vocal-focused, meta-inspired balance: refined mids, a friendly yet detailed top end, and a clean, controlled low end. Bass quality is textured and separated but intentionally polite—not for hip-hop/EDM impact chasers. The midrange brings clear, natural tone without shout; both male and female vocals sit forward. The treble is the star: highly resolving, airy, and surprisingly non-fatiguing for the four micro-planars, avoiding metallic glare while adding tasteful sparkle.
Technically, separation and resolution impress, with a mild cohesiveness quirk where the treble detail outshines bass/mids. Versus peers: CK2V is more V-shaped and brighter-hot; SL224 sounds more natural. Moondrop Meteor offers smoother treble and mid timbre, but SL224’s bass quality and value punch back. Dunu Brain Dance is technically stronger; SL224 wins on tonality. SoftEars Studio 4 remains more lifelike/cohesive; SL224 brings more air and fun. AFUL Performer 7 is the better all-rounder; SL224 is for lighter-bass, vocal clarity. Kiwi Ears Astral is airier/more micro-detailed; SL224 plays it safer up top with more forward vocals. Recommendation: vocal lovers and treble-sensitive listeners wanting detail without sting. Not for bassheads or warm-tilted tastes. Final verdict: a confident 4/5 and the most compelling Myer release so far.
Gizaudio Axel original ranking
Gizaudio Axel Youtube ChannelJuzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Jays Audio
6
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
MYER SL224 reviewed by Jays Audio
7
Reviewer Score
Jays Audio Youtube Channel
Juzear Butterfly 61T (more reviews)
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by ATechReviews
8.4
* Score computed by IEMRanking.com
Youtube Video Summary
This set arrives with a small pocketable case, a very comfortable shell and a supple cable that together make it easy to forget that anything is in the ears. With the right tips, the Juzear Butterfly 61T offers excellent passive noise isolation, blocking more outside noise than most IEMs in the collection and approaching the Studio 4 in isolation. Comfort is effectively a non-issue despite the larger nozzle, and the combination of isolation, comfort and a fatigue-free tuning makes it very easy to lose track of time while listening.
On the low end, the 61T delivers a level of textured bass that is rare in this price bracket, combining strong sub-bass extension with a beautifully articulated mid-bass. Kick drums and bass lines have clear layering and detail yet stay clean and controlled, with just a touch of bass bleed that slightly softens ultimate midrange clarity but adds pleasing fullness to pianos, acoustic guitars and male vocals. The lower mids carry a bit of warmth and body without sounding muddy, while the rest of the midrange stays clear, detailed and completely free of shout or harshness across rock, metal, jazz, EDM and pop.
The upper mids and treble are tuned with a gentle dip around 4–6 kHz that keeps things smooth and non-fatiguing even at higher volumes, letting female vocals and saxophones sound extended, organic and natural rather than aggressive. Treble itself sits in a neutral, slightly reserved place with enough air and sparkle for clarity, though some listeners who prefer a brighter, airier presentation may wish for a bit more. Where the 61T really pulls ahead is in its soundstage and imaging: width and especially depth are above average, with convincing 360-degree placement that feels more immersive than many peers and even outperforms more expensive sets like DaVinci in stage and imaging. Technical detail is clearly above most sub-$200 options and, while a step below benchmark sets like Blessing 2 or Studio 4 in sheer microdetail, the overall mix of tuning, stage and comfort makes this an IEM that is very easy to recommend wholeheartedly for its price.
ATechReviews Youtube Channel
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Z-Reviews
7.2
* score rescaled + normalized
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Yifang
6.5
Reviewer Score
Juzear Butterfly 61T reviewed by Super* Review
6*
* score rescaled + normalized
Super* Review original ranking
Super* Review Youtube Channel
MYER SL224 (more reviews)
MYER SL224 reviewed by Kois Archive
8
Reviewer Score
Youtube Video Summary
The MYER SL224 is a stylish tribrid (2DD + 2BA + 4 microplanars) coming in around $270, shipped with a decent 4-core cable featuring 3.5 / 4.4 / USB-C interchangeable plugs, a zipper case, and three ear-tip sets (regular silicone, SpinFit-style silicone, foam). Build is eye-catching thanks to a real mother-of-pearl faceplate; the shell is on the larger side with a universal-custom shape that sits comfortably for long sessions, though smaller ears should test fit first. Cable behavior is mostly cooperative (functional chin slider, slight memory), and overall accessories feel thoughtful for the price.
Tonally, SL224 targets a clean, clinical presentation: sub-bass carries the weight while mid-bass stays nearer to neutral, which can read a touch lean unless paired with a warmer source (tube or similar) to add body. The midrange tracks neutral until the upper-mid / lower-treble rise, boosting female vocal harmonics and air; some may find this area forward, yet it avoids the usual micro-planar harshness. Treble is well-extended and energetic, if not the smoothest—there’s a hint of disconnect around the pinna gain—but this nit shows mainly against sets two to three times the price. Technical chops are a highlight: resolution rivals class standouts (think AFUL P7 territory), imaging is tidy, stage is fairly wide, and it earns a strong nod for competitive gaming.
Against peers, CK2V hits harder down low but dips mid-bass and feels less even up top; AFUL P7 is more balanced yet less flattering to female vocals and trickier in treble; “Dusk” (DSP) delivers better bass and a warmer tilt; “Brain Dance” is flashier but far sharper; Moondrop Meteor tracks a similar tonality with smoother highs and a mid-centric lean—an easy upgrade path if this signature clicks. Recommendation is clear: pick SL224 for a mid/treble-focused set with standout detail and clarity; skip it if sensitive to upper-mid energy or chasing a warm, bass-rich tuning. For value, this feels underrated and distinct in a meta-heavy market, earning a solid three-star recommendation.
Kois Archive Youtube Channel
MYER SL224 reviewed by Web Search
7.5
Reviewer Score
The MYER SLIIVO SL224 is an eight-driver hybrid built around 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar units with a 36 Ω impedance and 108 dB sensitivity, positioned at an MSRP around $269.99 (often on sale near $230). This configuration, including 10 mm and 6 mm dynamic drivers, suggests an intent toward a clean, extended response rather than a bass-dominant tuning. Specs & pricing: 2DD+2BA+4 micro-planar, 10 mm + 6 mm DD, swappable 3.5/4.4/Type-C cable, sale price ~$229.49, regular $269.99.
Subjective reports converge on a balanced/neutral tonality with energetic yet controlled low end from the dual-DD array, lively mids, and an airy but not piercing treble. Mobileaudiophile characterizes bass as fast and powerful with engaging mids and treble, yielding a coherent, never-boring balance; this aligns with the SL224’s technical focus rather than coloration. Tonality & balance references: balanced tuning, lively mids, airy treble; bass praised for speed and control.
Technical impressions emphasize dynamics, detail retrieval, and cleanliness, with community notes calling out tight, quick mid-bass and respectable separation; limitations include occasional midrange forwardness that can mask other bands on some tracks and a stage that reads more precise than expansive. These traits point to strong value in the ~$230 bracket for listeners prioritizing clarity and midrange presence over sheer sub-bass weight. Community impressions & caveats: tight mid-bass, good dynamics; mids can get a bit forward depending on material.
Juzear Butterfly 61T Details
Driver Configuration: 1DD+6BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Brand: Juzear Top Juzear IEMs
Price (Msrp): $219
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
MYER SL224 Details
Driver Configuration: 2DD+2BA+4Micro-Planar
Tuning Type: Neutral
Price (Msrp): $269.99
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Juzear Butterfly 61T User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
MYER SL224 User Review Score
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Juzear Butterfly 61T Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.1Gaming Grade
A-MYER SL224 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
7.6Gaming Grade
AJuzear Butterfly 61T Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- It presents a smooth, well-integrated tonal balance that plays nicely with many styles. It maintains natural timbre across the range.
Average Technical Grade
B+- The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
MYER SL224 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
A- Overall balance feels confident and refined, rewarding long listening sessions. A reliable all-rounder for everyday listening.
Average Technical Grade
A- Technical performance is solid, offering clear separation and consistent detail retrieval. There's enough space for instruments to breathe.
Juzear Butterfly 61T User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewMYER SL224 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewFind your next IEM:
IEM Finder Quiz
newIEM Comparison Tool
newVS