Juzear Clear VS Celestee Pandomonon 2.0

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

Home Ranking Compare IEMs
My Ranking My Favorites

Juzear Clear and Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 are in-ear monitors. Juzear Clear costs $50 while Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 costs $60. Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 is $10 more expensive. Juzear Clear holds a decisive 1.9-point edge in reviewer scores (6.4 vs 4.5). Juzear Clear has significantly better dynamics with a 4-point edge.

Insights

Metric Juzear Clear Celestee Pandomonon 2.0
Mids 5 5
Treble 4 4
Soundstage 6 6
Dynamics 5 1
Tonality 4.8 4.5
Technicalities 4 4
Take these comparisons with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Juzear Clear and Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.

Juzear Clear Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss
Head-Fi.org
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.4

Mixed to Positive

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

4.5

Generally Unfavorable

Reviews Comparison

Juzear Clear reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 5.8 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
This little dude is pretty, and hammers. Bass machine.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: C+ Soundstage: B
YouTube video thumbnail

Buy Juzear Clear on HiFiGO

Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your Juzear Clear or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $49

Buy Juzear Clear on HiFiGO

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 reviewed by Jaytiss

Jaytiss 4.5 Reviewer Score
C Tuning
C- Tech
Solid iem for those who enjoy a light bass shelf.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Mids: C+ Treble: C- Dynamics: E- Soundstage: B

Juzear Clear (more reviews)

Juzear Clear reviewed by Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 7 * score rescaled + normalized
check links for more info:

Z-Reviews original ranking

Z-Reviews Youtube Channel
YouTube video thumbnail

Juzear Clear reviewed by Head-Fi.org

Head-Fi.org 6.3 * score rescaled + normalized
3 community members have rated the JUZEAR CLEAR at an average of 4.0/5 on Head-Fi. Overall sentiment: Very Positive.

URL to full Review

Head-Fi.org original ranking

Juzear Clear User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Juzear Clear Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4.2

Gaming Grade

C-

Juzear Clear Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • Uneven emphasis across the spectrum keeps the presentation unsettled and awkward. Acoustic instruments lose their natural body.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • Details smear quickly, leaving the presentation cramped and low on definition. You'll notice smearing on even moderately layered songs.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
The top end sounds acceptable but lacks the smoothness of higher tiers. Air is hinted at more than delivered.
Dynamics C+
You get reliable macrodynamics, with micro shifts that remain only adequate. A reliable performer for most tracks.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth, placing instruments in clearly defined positions. Instruments sit in their own lanes.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C
  • It struggles with balance, producing a lumpy response that rarely sounds coherent. Genre hopping highlights glaring inconsistencies.

Average Technical Grade

C-
  • The tuning renders a cramped window into the music, with nuance fading fast. Expect grainy textures to creep in.
Mids C+
It presents a stable midrange foundation suitable for everyday listening. Clarity is serviceable without standing out.
Treble C-
Highs are present enough yet carry a bit of grain and splash. Busy mixes can still feel a bit splashy.
Dynamics E-
Dynamic expression is extremely poor, draining impact from every hit. Notes lack the startle or decay they need.
Soundstage B
Lateral spread stretches comfortably while front/back cues start to feel convincing. You can trace front-to-back movement.
Gaming C-
Minimal environmental definition provides only general audio cues. Suitable for games where positioning isn't critical.

Juzear Clear User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Celestee Pandomonon 2.0 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.
Buy

Footer