KBear Neon VS Tin Hifi C3

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

KBear Neon and Tin Hifi C3 are in-ear monitors. KBear Neon costs $50 while Tin Hifi C3 costs $50. Tin Hifi C3 holds a decisive 3.1-point edge in reviewer scores (3.5 vs 6.5).

Insights

Metric KBear Neon Tin Hifi C3
Bass 3 6.5
Mids 4 6.5
Treble 3 6.5
Details 2 6.5
Imaging 2 6.5
Dynamics 3 6.5
Tonality 4.2 6.5
Technicalities 3.2 6.5

KBear Neon Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Very Poor


Tin Hifi C3 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review
Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

6.5

Cautiously Favorable


KBear Neon User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Tin Hifi C3 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KBear Neon Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

Tin Hifi C3 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.5

Gaming Grade

B+

KBear Neon Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

Tin Hifi C3 Scorings

KBear Neon Reviews

Crin 4 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin
Precogvision 2.9 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
E+ Tech
Extremely limited resolution despite OK tuning.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: D Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: E+ Imaging: E+

KBear Neon User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Tin Hifi C3 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer