IEMRanking.com
Home
KBear Neon
Average Reviewer Scores
Average Reviewer Score:
3.5Very Poor
Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
3.5Gaming Grade
D+KBear Neon Details
Driver Configuration: 1BA
Tuning Type: Neutral
Brand: Kbear Top Kbear IEMs
Price (Msrp): $50
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Reviews
check links for more info: Crin Youtube Channel
Extremely limited resolution despite OK tuning. Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D
Mids: C-
Treble: D
Dynamics: D
Details: E+
Imaging: E+
Tools
IEM Finder Quiz
new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
KBear Neon Infos
Compare KBear Neon to popular alternatives
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name
VS
Name
IEM | alt. Score |
---|---|
KBear Neon vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
|
6.5 |
KBear Neon vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6.4 |
KBear Neon vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better mids and treble.
|
6.2 |
KBear Neon vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
6 |
KBear Neon vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
|
6 |
KBear Neon vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
6 |
KBear Neon vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red
TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red offers better bass, treble and details.
|
5.9 |
KBear Neon vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
|
5.8 |
KBear Neon vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
|
5.7 |
KBear Neon vs. CCA Rhapsody
CCA Rhapsody offers better mids and treble.
|
5.7 |
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
C-- Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.
Average Technical Grade
D- Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass
D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids
C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble
D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics
D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details
E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging
E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming
D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.
User Reviews
Example User
Posted on ...
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review