KBear Neon [3.5/10]

Reviews (2), scores and comparisons for KBear Neon

IEMRanking.com Home KBear Neon

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

3.5

Very Poor

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

3.5

Gaming Grade

D+

Reviews

Crin 4 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C- Tech
check links for more info:

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin
Precogvision 2.9 Reviewer Score
D Tuning
E+ Tech
Extremely limited resolution despite OK tuning.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: D Mids: C- Treble: D Dynamics: D Details: E+ Imaging: E+

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

KBear Neon Infos

Compare KBear Neon to popular alternatives

Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
KBear Neon vs. Tin Hifi C3
Similar overall performance.
6.5
KBear Neon vs. Juzear Clear
Juzear Clear offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6.4
KBear Neon vs. 7hz Sonus
7hz Sonus offers better mids and treble.
6.2
KBear Neon vs. INAWAKEN DAWN Ms
INAWAKEN DAWN Ms offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
6
KBear Neon vs. Kefine Delci
Kefine Delci offers better dynamics, mids and treble.
6
KBear Neon vs. Intime Sora Light
Intime Sora Light offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
6
KBear Neon vs. TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red
TRUTHEAR x Crinacle Zero Red offers better bass, treble and details.
5.9
KBear Neon vs. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra offers better dynamics, treble and mids.
5.8
KBear Neon vs. Kefine Klean
Kefine Klean offers better mids, treble and dynamics.
5.7
KBear Neon vs. CCA Rhapsody
CCA Rhapsody offers better mids and treble.
5.7
Best IEMs from $50 - $100

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C-
  • Significantly flawed tuning. Noticeable frequency imbalances and unnatural timbre distract from music. Lacks versatility across recordings.

Average Technical Grade

D
  • Limited resolution; finer nuances are masked. Soundstage feels narrow, and complex passages cause muddiness. Transitions lack finesse.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids C-
Midrange is passable but unrefined. Lacks detail and smoothness, with occasional harshness in upper mids.
Treble D
Uneven treble response with noticeable peaks and dips. Can sound both dull and occasionally harsh simultaneously.
Dynamics D
Noticeably compressed dynamics. Musical expression suffers with weak transients and poor contrast between quiet and loud sections.
Details E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming D+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer