Kinera Celest Gumiho VS EPZ Q5
IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side
Kinera Celest Gumiho and EPZ Q5 are in-ear monitors. Kinera Celest Gumiho costs $49 while EPZ Q5 costs $50. EPZ Q5 is $1 more expensive. EPZ Q5 holds a decisive 2.9-point edge in reviewer scores (2.6 vs 5.5). EPZ Q5 has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge and EPZ Q5 has significantly better treble with a 2-point edge.
Insights
| Metric | Kinera Celest Gumiho | EPZ Q5 |
|---|---|---|
| Bass | 3 | 5.5 |
| Mids | 3 | 5 |
| Treble | 2 | 4 |
| Details | 3 | 5.5 |
| Soundstage | 2.6 | 6 |
| Imaging | 3 | 5.5 |
| Dynamics | 2.6 | 2 |
| Gaming capabilities | 2.7 | 5.2 |
Kinera Celest Gumiho Aggregated Review Score
Kinera Celest Gumiho Average Reviewer Scores
EPZ Q5 Aggregated Review Score
EPZ Q5 Average Reviewer Scores
Kinera Celest Gumiho Details
Driver Configuration: 1Planar BA
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $49
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
EPZ Q5 Details
Driver Configuration: n/a
Tuning Type: n/a
Price (Msrp): $50
Support our free service! Buying through our affiliate links costs you nothing extra:
Kinera Celest Gumiho User Review Score
Kinera Celest Gumiho Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
EPZ Q5 User Review Score
EPZ Q5 Average User Scores
Average User Score: n/a
Based on 0 user reviews
No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!
Kinera Celest Gumiho Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
2.7Gaming Grade
D-EPZ Q5 Gaming Score
Gaming Score & Grade
- The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.
Gaming Score
5.2Gaming Grade
C+Kinera Celest Gumiho Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
D-- Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.
Average Technical Grade
D-- Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
EPZ Q5 Scorings
Average Technical & Tuning Grades
Average Tunign Grade
B-- Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.
Average Technical Grade
C+- Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Kinera Celest Gumiho Reviews
Kinera Celest Gumiho reviewed by: Nymz
2.6
Reviewer Score
check links for more info:
EPZ Q5 Reviews
EPZ Q5 reviewed by: Z-Reviews
7
* score normalized
EPZ Q5 reviewed by: Jays Audio
5
Reviewer Score
Can be a bit bright on pop/edm, but very good for jazz/blues/soul and warm instrumentals. Jays Audio Youtube Channel
EPZ Q5 reviewed by: Jaytiss
4.5
Reviewer Score
Nice Bass response, great graph, overall clean set. Jaytiss Youtube Channel
Kinera Celest Gumiho User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own reviewEPZ Q5 User Reviews
"This is an example review"
Pros
- Example pro 1
- Example pro 2
Cons
- Example con 1
- Example con 2
Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.
You need to be signed in to write your own review