Kinera Celest Gumiho VS ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Kinera Celest Gumiho and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra are in-ear monitors. Kinera Celest Gumiho costs $49 while ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra costs $43. Kinera Celest Gumiho is $6 more expensive. ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra holds a decisive 3.2-point edge in reviewer scores (2.6 vs 5.8). ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better mids with a 2-point edge and ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra has significantly better treble with a 3-point edge.

Insights

Metric Kinera Celest Gumiho ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra
Bass 3 5.8
Mids 3 5
Treble 2 5
Details 3 5.8
Soundstage 2.6 6
Imaging 3 5.8
Dynamics 2.6 6
Gaming capabilities 2.7 5

Kinera Celest Gumiho Aggregated Review Score

Kinera Celest Gumiho Average Reviewer Scores

Nymz

Average Reviewer Score:

2.6

Very Negative


ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Aggregated Review Score

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Average Reviewer Scores

Z-Reviews
Jaytiss

Average Reviewer Score:

5.8

Mixed


Kinera Celest Gumiho User Review Score

Kinera Celest Gumiho Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Review Score

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kinera Celest Gumiho Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.7

Gaming Grade

D-

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Kinera Celest Gumiho Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

D-
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

D-
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids D
Midrange is significantly uneven with coloration. Some frequencies are boosted while others are missing, creating an unnatural tone.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Details D
Modest detail presentation with significant loss of texture. Nuances are masked and complex passages become congested.
Imaging D
Modest imaging with basic left/right positioning. Lacks precision for center placement and suffers from positional blurring.
Gaming D-
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

C+
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

C+
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Mids C+
Decent midrange performance - balanced but unremarkable. Adequate clarity for most genres without notable flaws.
Treble C+
Decent treble with acceptable extension and detail. Can sound slightly unrefined but avoids being harsh or sibilant.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Soundstage B
Good soundstage with proper width and depth. Instruments have clear positioning with reasonable front/back placement.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision.

Kinera Celest Gumiho Reviews

Kinera Celest Gumiho reviewed by:

Nymz 2.6 Reviewer Score
D- Tuning
D- Tech
check links for more info:

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

- Nymz
Bass: D Mids: D Treble: E+ Details: D Imaging: D

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra Reviews

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by:

Z-Reviews 5.5 * score normalized
Ad
Using this affiliate link for ordering your ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra or any other IEM helps fund our free service at no extra cost to you.

Price: $38.99

Buy ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra on Hifigo

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra reviewed by:

Jaytiss 6 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
C+ Tech
Great details and bass, so fun.

Jaytiss original ranking

Jaytiss Youtube Channel
- Jaytiss
Mids: C+ Treble: C+ Dynamics: B Soundstage: B

Kinera Celest Gumiho User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

ROSESELSA Aurora Ultra User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer