Symphonium Helios VS Kinera Nanna 2.0

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

Symphonium Helios and Kinera Nanna 2.0 use 4BA and 1DD+1BA+2EST driver setups respectively. Symphonium Helios costs $1,100 while Kinera Nanna 2.0 costs $950. Symphonium Helios is $150 more expensive. Symphonium Helios holds a decisive 2.4-point edge in reviewer scores (7.9 vs 5.5). Symphonium Helios has better bass with a 0.5-point edge, Symphonium Helios has significantly better mids with a 1.4-point edge, Symphonium Helios has significantly better treble with a 2.1-point edge, Symphonium Helios has significantly better dynamics with a 1.5-point edge, Symphonium Helios has significantly better details with a 3.1-point edge and Symphonium Helios has significantly better imaging with a 2.8-point edge.

Insights

Metric Symphonium Helios Kinera Nanna 2.0
Bass 7 6.5
Mids 7.9 6.5
Treble 8.6 6.5
Details 8.1 5
Soundstage 8 5.5
Imaging 7.8 5
Dynamics 7.5 6
Tonality 7.8 5.7
Technicalities 7.8 6.1

Symphonium Helios Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Smirk Audio Nymz Precogvision Crin
Shuwa-T Z-Reviews

Average Reviewer Score:

7.9

Strongly Favorable


Kinera Nanna 2.0 Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Tim Tuned
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed to Negative


Symphonium Helios User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Kinera Nanna 2.0 User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Symphonium Helios Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

6.8

Gaming Grade

B+

Kinera Nanna 2.0 Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Symphonium Helios Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

A
  • Well-executed tonal character. No major flaws with good technical control. Smooth presentation works with multiple genres.

Average Technical Grade

A
  • Good technical performance. Clear separation and decent detail retrieval across various tracks. Soundstage shows reasonable width and depth.
Bass A-
Strong, well-defined bass with good texture. Delivers satisfying punch and rumble without overwhelming other frequencies.
Mids A
Excellent midrange with natural timbre and great detail retrieval. Vocals are forward and emotive with lifelike instrument reproduction.
Treble S-
Superb treble: effortless extension with crystal clarity. Perfect balance of sparkle and smoothness with exceptional detail.
Dynamics A
Excellent dynamics with great contrast and speed. Transients are crisp and micro-details are clearly articulated.
Soundstage A+
Exceptional soundstage with holographic imaging. Creates a truly three-dimensional space where instruments float naturally around you.
Details A+
Exceptional resolution that uncovers the deepest layers. Retrieves even the most minute details while maintaining natural timbre.
Imaging A
Excellent imaging: precise and stable placement. Instruments occupy specific points in space with tangible positions.
Gaming B+
Respectable environmental presentation favors atmosphere over precision. Detects obvious directional cues while conveying game world ambiance. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Kinera Nanna 2.0 Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Generally enjoyable tonal character with some noticeable unevenness. Maintains listenability while showing room for refinement in frequency balance.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Satisfactory technical performance. Handles basic detail retrieval adequately in most tracks. Maintains reasonable cohesion in simpler arrangements.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B+
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Symphonium Helios Reviews

Reviewed by: Shuwa-T

Shuwa-T 8.1 Reviewer Score
A+ Tuning
A+ Tech
Clean-sounding monitor with great bass decay Occasional splashy cymbals due to the treble extension

Shuwa-T original ranking

Shuwa-T Website

Bass: A Mids: A+ Treble: S- Soundstage: A+ Details: S- Imaging: A+

Reviewed by: Z-Reviews

Z-Reviews 8 * score normalized

Reviewed by: Smirk Audio

Smirk Audio 7.9 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Exceptional treble with solid bass. Great techs. Some may find the midrange a bit clinical. Fit will be a dealbreaker to some. Cons: Poor fit.

Smirk Audio original ranking

Smirk Audio Head-Fi Profile

Bass: A Mids: A Treble: S- Dynamics: A+ Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Reviewed by: Nymz

Nymz 7.9 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A+ Tech
Top tier clarity and great technicalities, other than a hint of BA timbre plasticness to it. Mid-bass recession is the con in the tuning, turning it into a dry IEM. Top performer nonetheless.

Nymz original ranking

Nymz Website

Bass: B Mids: A+ Treble: S Details: A+ Imaging: A+

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 7.7 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A- Tech
Great technicalities. Lacking that last leg of refinement in terms of coherency.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A+ Treble: A+ Dynamics: A- Details: A+ Imaging: A-

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 7.5 Reviewer Score
A Tuning
A Tech

Kinera Nanna 2.0 Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Bass is a tad uncontrolled and the mids could use more refinement. The original is arguably superior.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Probably Kinera's best set. Pretty decent overall.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A- Tech
Good bass, decent v-shape tuning

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-

Symphonium Helios User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Kinera Nanna 2.0 User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer