Kinera Nanna 2.0 Review & Ranking

Aggregated Scores from Top Experts & Community

IEMRanking.com Home Kinera Nanna 2.0

Kinera Nanna 2.0 Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision Tim Tuned
Crin

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Generally Unfavorable

Kinera Nanna 2.0 Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Review by:

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Bass is a tad uncontrolled and the mids could use more refinement. The original is arguably superior.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel
- Crin

Review by:

Precogvision 5.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Probably Kinera's best set. Pretty decent overall.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
- Precogvision
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Review by:

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A- Tech
Pros: Good bass, decent v-shape tuning.

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
- Tim Tuned
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Flawed execution of tonal character. Noticeable peaks/dips affect timbre and coherence. May suit specific genres but lacks refinement.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • Competent but unremarkable. Decent detail retrieval in quieter tracks, though busy sections challenge cohesion. Imaging is average, lacking depth.
Bass B+
Good bass foundation with decent impact. Maintains acceptable control while providing satisfying thump in most tracks.
Mids B+
Good midrange presence with solid clarity. Vocals are clear and instruments have reasonable texture and body.
Treble B+
Good treble response - clear and detailed without fatigue. Well-extended with proper air and sparkle.
Dynamics B
Good dynamic expression with solid impact. Handles volume contrasts well while maintaining good transient snap.
Details C+
Decent detail retrieval. Handles most textures adequately though micro-details and ambient cues could be more pronounced.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy. Good left/right placement with acceptable center image, though depth positioning is approximate.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

Top alternatives for Kinera Nanna 2.0

Write own User-Review for Kinera Nanna 2.0
Please to write User Reviews
Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Be the first to share your experience!