Kinera Nanna 2.0 - Reviews & Ratings

3 Reviews (C Tier | 5.5/10)

Home Kinera Nanna 2.0

Summary

Based on 3 reviews, the Kinera Nanna 2.0 is receiving steady, if unspectacular, approval from reviewers, highlighting its dependable nature.

Average Reviewer Scores

Average Reviewer Score:

5.5

Mixed to Negative

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

5

Gaming Grade

C+

Reviews

Reviewed by: Crin

Crin 6 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
B Tech
Bass is a tad uncontrolled and the mids could use more refinement. The original is arguably superior.

Crin original ranking

Crin Youtube Channel

Reviewed by: Precogvision

Precogvision 5.4 Reviewer Score
B Tuning
C+ Tech
Probably Kinera's best set. Pretty decent overall.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: B Mids: B Treble: B Dynamics: B Details: C+ Imaging: C+

Reviewed by: Tim Tuned

Tim Tuned 5 Reviewer Score
C+ Tuning
A- Tech
Good bass, decent v-shape tuning

Tim Tuned original ranking

Tim Tuned Youtube Channel
Bass: A- Mids: A- Treble: A-

Tools

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/3) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/3) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?
(3/3) Which tuning do you prefer?
You can select multiple options.

Kinera Nanna 2.0 Infos

Discuss Kinera Nanna 2.0 with the community

Start an official forum discussion for this IEM. We'll create a new thread titled "Kinera Nanna 2.0 discussion thread" in our IEM Discussion Threads.

Compare Kinera Nanna 2.0 to popular alternatives

Take this comparison with a grain of salt—we don't have enough Kinera Nanna 2.0 reviews saved yet to provide an unbiased result.
Compare two IEMs side by side
Name

VS

Name
IEM alt. Score
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Letshuoer Mystic 8
Letshuoer Mystic 8 offers better details, imaging and treble.
8.4
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Campfire Audio Alien Brain
Campfire Audio Alien Brain offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
8.3
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Thieaudio Monarch MK3
Thieaudio Monarch MK3 offers better details, imaging and dynamics.
8.2
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. 64 Audio U4S
64 Audio U4S offers better imaging, details and dynamics.
8.1
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Thieaudio Monarch Mk2
Thieaudio Monarch Mk2 offers better details, imaging and mids.
8.1
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Thieaudio Hype 10
Thieaudio Hype 10 offers better imaging, details and treble.
8
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Symphonium Helios
Symphonium Helios offers better details, imaging and treble.
8
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Thieaudio Origin
Thieaudio Origin offers better dynamics, bass and mids.
7.9
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. Dunu Mirai
Dunu Mirai offers better details, imaging and bass.
7.9
Kinera Nanna 2.0 vs. 7th Acoustics Supernova
7th Acoustics Supernova offers better imaging, mids and details.
7.9
Best IEMs from $600 - $1,000

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

B-
  • Tonality is generally agreeable, though a few bumps remind you of its limits. Certain tracks spotlight its tonal quirks.

Average Technical Grade

B
  • The presentation is steady if unspectacular, holding onto essential details when the music stays simple. Fine details occasionally slip through the cracks.
Bass B+
Expect a solid thump that keeps the rhythm engaging yet controlled. Sub-bass presence is supportive, not overwhelming.
Mids B+
The mids are articulate and well-balanced, lending body to instruments. Instrument layering remains stable.
Treble B+
Expect crisp, well-balanced treble that keeps shimmer intact. You hear reverbs decay naturally.
Dynamics B
Expect energetic dynamics that bring music to life without harshness. It injects enthusiasm into fast music.
Details C+
The mix feels articulate, yet the tiniest ripples don't always sparkle. Background ambience is reasonably clear.
Imaging C+
Decent positional accuracy provides good left/right placement with an acceptable center image. Instruments stay anchored once placed.
Gaming C+
Fundamental left/right positioning with limited depth perception. Works for non-competitive gaming but lacks precision. Bad value-to-cost for gaming purpose - not recommended

User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

Footer