JVC FX7 Gumy VS KZ ATE

IEM Comparison: Expert & Community Scores Side-by-Side

IEMRanking.com Home Compare IEMs

JVC FX7 Gumy and KZ ATE are in-ear monitors. JVC FX7 Gumy costs $8 while KZ ATE costs $8. KZ ATE holds a decisive 1-point edge in reviewer scores (3.1 vs 4).

Insights

Metric JVC FX7 Gumy KZ ATE
Bass 3 4
Mids 2 4
Treble 2 4
Details 2 4
Imaging 2 4
Dynamics 2 4
Tonality 2.3 4
Technicalities 2 4

JVC FX7 Gumy Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Precogvision
Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

3.1

Very Poor


KZ ATE Aggregated Review Score

Average Reviewer Scores

Super* Review

Average Reviewer Score:

4

Unfavorable


Reviews Comparison

JVC FX7 Gumy reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score normalized

KZ ATE reviewed by Super* Review

Super* Review 4* * score normalized

JVC FX7 Gumy (more reviews)

JVC FX7 Gumy reviewed by Precogvision

Precogvision 2.1 Reviewer Score
E+ Tuning
E+ Tech
Boomy and dark, yet simultaneously peaky in the mid-treble. Typical V-shape consumer sound.

Precogvision original ranking

Precogvision Youtube Channel
Bass: D Mids: E+ Treble: E+ Dynamics: E+ Details: E+ Imaging: E+

JVC FX7 Gumy User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

KZ ATE User Review Score

Average User Scores

Average User Score: n/a

Based on 0 user reviews

No user reviews yet. Be the first one who writes a review!

JVC FX7 Gumy Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

2.1

Gaming Grade

E+

KZ ATE Gaming Score

Gaming Score & Grade

  • The gaming score is prioritizing technical capabilities of the IEM (Separation, Layering, Soundstage) and good value.

Gaming Score

4

Gaming Grade

C-

JVC FX7 Gumy Scorings

Average Technical & Tuning Grades

Average Tunign Grade

E+
  • Tonally jarring or fatiguing. Frequency clashes (e.g., piercing treble, bloated bass) make extended listening unpleasant. Poor genre adaptation.

Average Technical Grade

E+
  • Noticeably blurred or congested. Struggles with basic instrument separation; details are lost in simple tracks. Feels "flat" and one-dimensional.
Bass D
Bass is light and underwhelming. While some faint rumble exists, it lacks punch and authority in any meaningful way.
Mids E+
Midrange is thin and hollow with noticeable gaps. Instruments lack body and vocals sound distant and weak.
Treble E+
Treble is noticeably dark and lacking extension. Cymbals lack shimmer and high-frequency details are obscured.
Dynamics E+
Limited dynamic range with poor micro-detail. Subtle volume changes are lost, and transients lack proper attack.
Details E+
Noticeably blurred and lacking definition. Background elements are smeared together and micro-details are inaudible.
Imaging E+
Poor instrument placement with unstable positioning. Instruments drift and lack fixed locations within the sound field.
Gaming E+
Compromised imaging significantly impacts gameplay awareness. Directional cues often lack accuracy or consistency.

KZ ATE Scorings

JVC FX7 Gumy User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

KZ ATE User Reviews

Example User Posted on ...
0.0

"This is an example review"

Pros
  • Example pro 1
  • Example pro 2
Cons
  • Example con 1
  • Example con 2
No User-Reviews Yet

Share your experience and build your personal ranking list.

You need to be signed in to write your own review

Find your next IEM:

IEM Finder Quiz

new
Use this quiz and answer a few questions to get your individual IEM recommendation list
(1/2) How much are you willing to spend on the IEM?
(2/2) Which sound characteristics are particularly important to you?

Footer